
In 2011, the US wanted to leave behind a small team for training purposes, but that plan ran into complications when a Status of Forces Agreement could not be reached with the Iraqi government. The key stumbling block of this agreement was “immunity from prosecution” for US troops. In the end, however, it seemed that both Iraq and the US were relieved that the deal fell through and no US troops were left behind. It is unlikely that a residual US force would have been able to prevent the fall of Iraq anyway, similar to the odds they’ll face in Afghanistan.
After the US forces withdrew in 2011, Prime Minister Nuri al Maliki immediately began to remove Sunni commanders from the military and replaced them with Shia officers. Maliki opted for ideology over competence. No wonder ISIS was able to advance so swiftly across Iraq. The group uses social media to upload gory images and intimidating videos of its brutality to instill fear in its opponents. This strategy has proven effective since Iraqi soldiers are fleeing their posts rather than choosing to face a gruesome outcome if captured alive. Meanwhile, ISIS has built upon their strength by seizing weapons and US supplied Humvees from abandoned military bases. These vehicles were used to gain control of villages close to the Turkish border.
In these desperate times, while facing mass desertions from their army, Iraq’s government has provided “acceptable assurances on the issue of protections” for US personnel. However, it may be too little too late. Nuri al Maliki is not interested in sharing power, he has ignored the demands of the Sunni population, the Kurds are attempting to create an independent state, and the Sunnis agree on toppling the government even though they are divided over what to do with ISIS.
John Kerry’s attempt to piece together a new Iraqi government and his calls for unity are lagging behind military changes on the ground. As the crisis unfolds, US, Iranian, and Iraqi policies have been inconsistent with regard to their particular roles. A clear-cut agreement must be formulated between the nations. The Kurds, the Sunnis, and the Shias of Iraq are heading their separate ways and this is why an all-inclusive Iraqi government is the answer, one that serves the interests of all Iraqis and not just the Shia. However, such a government remains an idealistic goal at the moment even though it may be the only way to defeat ISIS.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 30th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ