Chinese-American prime target in Nanga Parbat massacre

Published: June 29, 2014
The Nanga Parbat tragedy was for G-B what 9/11 was for the rest of Pakistan, in terms of tourism, says Federal Minister for G-B and Azad Kashmir Birjis Tahir. PHOTO: REUTERS

The Nanga Parbat tragedy was for G-B what 9/11 was for the rest of Pakistan, in terms of tourism, says Federal Minister for G-B and Azad Kashmir Birjis Tahir. PHOTO: REUTERS

GILGIT: The massacre of 10 foreign climbers on Pakistan’s “Killer Mountain” a year ago came after a failed attempt to capture a Chinese-American to use him as a high-value bargaining chip, officials and militant sources have said.

The June 22, 2013, attack at the base camp for the 8,126-metre Nanga Parbat, Pakistan’s second-highest mountain — nicknamed for its treacherous terrain — was the deadliest assault on foreigners in the country for a decade.

Through interviews with multiple officials, militants and negotiators assigned to bring the culprits out of hiding, AFP has been able to piece together a picture of the events surrounding the slaughter and its aftermath.

One year on, with tourism in the northern Gilgit-Baltistan region still suffering, most of the 10 suspects implicated in the attack are still at large, while sources close to the investigation have cast doubt on the guilt of some of those arrested.

The victims were identified as three Ukrainians, two Chinese — including Chinese-American Chen Honglu — two Slovakians, one Lithuanian and one Nepalese as well as a Pakistani guide.

But dual national Chen was the prime target, according to militant sources.

Mystery commanders

The story begins in early June 2013, when a local militant contacted other fighters to tell them two mysterious commanders had arrived from out of town and wanted to meet.

The northern Gilgit-Baltistan region, high in the Himalayas, has been relatively immune to the militant insurgency plaguing the country in recent years.

The men met at a house in the town of Chilas, where the two strangers, wearing all-enveloping burqas, were introduced as important Taliban cadres from Afghanistan.

The local fighters were briefed on the planned Nanga Parbat operation.

“They were told that the mission was about kidnapping a foreigner in order to later bargain for the release of an important Taliban commander,” an investigator assigned to the case said.

Militant sources told AFP the Chinese-American was the specific target, with the plan being to trade him for Taliban in Afghanistan.

The men then met a local sectarian group in a forest, recruiting two more fighters — against the sectarian group leader’s wishes — to bring their number to 10.

They left for the Nanga Parbat base camp in the early evening, wearing the uniforms of the Gilgit Scouts, a paramilitary police unit.

“The two burqa-clad commanders had taken off their burqas and were in military uniforms like the rest of us but their faces were covered with a cloth,” a militant source told AFP, explaining that they were supposed to grab the target.

But as the attack unfolded in the freezing night, Chen burst out of his tent and tackled one of the militants using martial arts techniques.

The militant, named Mujeeb, panicked and shot him, destroying the main purpose of the mission and infuriating the shadowy masked commanders.

The remaining climbers were then tied up and shot one by one.

“It all happened because of Mujeeb,” said a local source who spoke on condition of anonymity.

“The actual plan had been to kidnap a Chinese-American but his reaction led to the killing of himself and 10 others,” he said.

This account was corroborated by two officials from the team investigating the attack.

After the slaughter, the attackers walked for five hours to a remote village where they buried their uniforms and had breakfast before walking on to another village and dispersing.

High-value target

Beyond Chen’s US nationality, it is unclear why he became such a valued target of the group.

The 50-year-old studied electrical engineering at Tsinghua University in China, and worked for some time in California before returning to Shanghai, according to the Alpinist magazine.

In a video clip recorded by negotiators who met with him, Mujeeb owned up to the killing of Chen but told them he would not surrender because he acted in “self-defence”.

“What did you expect me to do, wait for him to kill me? I panicked and opened fire,” Mujeeb said on the video.

More than four months went by before authorities made their first arrest in the case.

A total of 18 people were detained, of whom five are still in custody — but several militant sources say only one of them was involved in the attack, while the rest were forced to confess.

Mujeeb remains in hiding in the forests of the district, where, from time to time, he makes audio recordings of militant poetry that find their way to the markets of Gilgit town.

Bashir Qureshi, a member of the negotiating team, said there were many grey areas in the case.

“Nothing is clear, they have mixed up four different cases to give an impression that all the perpetrators have been arrested but the real perpetrators are still at large,” he said.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (10)

  • Jun 29, 2014 - 4:18PM

    As soon as the climbing season is about to start, ET comes up with this news. Way to go, Tribune! — Thanks for the service to the nation.


  • Had enough
    Jun 29, 2014 - 4:32PM

    Extremely sad and sorry the Chinese American guest was targetted.

    It is a disgrace people from out side come and kill our guests/tourists and give us a bad name.

    My sincere sympathies with this person, and the others, who were murdered.


  • Ali
    Jun 29, 2014 - 5:50PM

    I’m sorry for those guests/tourists who are brutally murdered by the barbarians and the cannibals. May Almighty crush the terrorists to the last of their race.


  • shahid
    Jun 29, 2014 - 6:25PM

    Long Live Islam, This is our pride, we kill innocent people, specially unarmed. Also, we kill women children and old aged. This is our Islam. Shame on us


  • Nadir
    Jun 29, 2014 - 6:56PM

    Wow, the article makes it seems as if the victim was responsible for his own death.


  • PakShock
    Jun 29, 2014 - 7:28PM

    Unbelievable, Now the attacker and the murderer complains that a citizen resisted due to fear of his life and so was at fault? Let’s see…. Who made the scheme of kidnap? The Chinese or the Terrorist gang leader? Who encroached another’s sleeping quarters? Of course there are “grey areas” e.g, the masked men identities, may be! Another is; If victims home country is a threatening or not for action.


  • Mudassir
    Jun 29, 2014 - 7:40PM

    Just visited the base camp last Tuesday (24th).
    Most awesome and dangerous adventure of my life (so far).


  • Voice
    Jun 29, 2014 - 8:42PM

    Mujeeb and other wanted militant are known to security forces about their hiding location…. but they fear to arrest them, or have instructions from above not to interfer on them…


  • John B
    Jun 29, 2014 - 9:44PM

    “They killed them all, buried their clothes and ate breakfast.

    The reason of killing them was that the victim resisted the kidnapping attempt, so the killer has the right of self defense ( so his killing is justified ).

    Under this type logical thought process, one can certainly say that they have anti-parallel concept of right and wrong and morality.


  • Ahmed
    Jun 30, 2014 - 12:39AM

    I visited gilgit by road. It was a long trip from islamabad to gilgit. As soon as you leave gilgit and enter kohistan district, you suddenly feel a difference. The wall chalkings and painted alogans along the road are filled with sectarian hatred. Many declare people of a specific sect as kafir. This area has been peaceful since ever. I was shocked to see it infestes with sectarian hatred. I appeal to the law enforcement agencies to try and counter the sectarian hatred bieng spread in a planned manner before its too late.


More in Pakistan