But instead of attacking those positions, the administration ordered all towns — densely populated settlements — to be vacated, forcing hundreds of thousands of civilians to move out — not knowing where they would be headed. This order was preceded by relentless air bombardment and a non-stop curfew on towns and villages in the area. First, the curfew began to take its toll. The civilians who perished in the bombardment by fighter jets had to be buried after funeral prayers. This was not possible because people either did not know who had been killed or could not venture out of their homes to see or confirm the identity of the dead. Second, the restrictions on movement took a toll on children. Some were sick and needed help; others were just thirsty and wanted water. Then when orders came to move out, there was no transport. Desperate and fatigued, the people began to leave and started moving in the direction they were being told to follow. They carried their children in their laps or on shoulders — some were being carried in baskets. There was no time and no stamina to carry any belongings. Some did not have time to collect their cattle either; others could barely hang on to a few animals. Some of those animals died due to suffocation and the heat.
But this was not enough. As they began their journey under the most pitiable conditions — in terribly hot weather — they were being subjected to another humiliation: body searches. So far, eight children and four women have died of the unbearable heat and out of exhaustion.
In fairness to the government, it was not possible to set up relief camps and lay down comprehensive arrangements to look after nearly 200,000 people in a matter of a few days. That obviously would take time. But the operation was planned months in advance and emergency relief measures could have been worked out in anticipation of the exodus. Levelling off the ground, layout of the camps, provision of basic items like tents, water, community toilets, electricity, sewerage/drainage and a kit containing items such as flour, rice, pulses and kerosene, etc. should have been prepared for the displaced families. But that is not our style of management!
Causing the expulsion of the entire population has happened before — in the case of the Swat operation where in a matter of just 30 days, three million people were displaced. The North Waziristan operation has also caused collateral damage in the shape of more than 200,000 people having been displaced initially in a matter of just three days. But this has another ominous dimension: such was the frustration that people by the thousands preferred to go across into an ‘unstable’ country rather than bear the agony and humiliation of living in the tribal areas.
Surely something has gone wrong somewhere. Lack of intelligent anticipation, lack of planning, lack of clarity on whether and how tens of thousands of people would be dislocated in a span of a few days are some of the apparent shortcomings. And above all, no lessons seem to have been learnt from previous such colossal human displacements that we handled in this country in such large numbers.
Fortunately, a focal person of high standing has been chosen to coordinate and handle the assignment of providing relief to the IDPs. Federal Minister General (retd) Abdul Qadir Baloch has impeccable credentials and vast administrative experience, both military and civil, to supervise the work entrusted to him. But he would require full support and cooperation of all layers of the administration, including the military, to enable him to come to the rescue of IDPs.
A centerpiece of the rescue and relief work should be the quickest possible return of the displaced people to their homes. At the same time, arrangements must be in place to ensure that their homes and belongings left behind are not abused or pilfered.
Now that a full-scale operation has been launched, the government must begin to reach out to the main tribes in each tribal agency and solicit their support in dealing with militants and bringing lasting peace to the area. The old systems — time tested and gladly accepted by the tribesmen — were rooted in the culture and societal norms of the tribal area. They delivered. Even when there was an epic struggle for liberation in Afghanistan during the 1980s and as all Afghan warriors used to pass through the tribal area, there were ripples of discontent — what to speak of disorder and militancy in the tribal area. Those systems were destroyed and dismantled when General (retd) Pervez Musharraf plunged the country into the so-called war on terror and sent in, very unwisely, the military into the tribal areas. That was a blunder which would cast its shadow on the area for years to come.
An honest reappraisal of policy and restoration of the systems that worked in the area would resolve not only the current crisis, but would also lay the foundation for durable peace and development in the tribal areas.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 28th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (16)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Gp65::For me it is a news that Nehru was not pragmatic.So far as I see for politician with such a sharp foresight like Nehru even Gandhi was of no match.The paper that you quote for I do not know for what says that Kashmir with Muslim majority are even today demanding independence from India (read the report carefully).It was the pragmatic mind of Nehru which foresaw that if people of Kashmir were allowed to get what they wanted,other majority Muslim states and provinces will tend to follow suit.A few examples of which are Junagarh,Gujrat and HyderAbad Deccan along with most of present west Punjab.By taking the Kashmir issue to UN Nehru very cleverly diverted the attention of the world from all these Muslim majority areas,otherwise entire indus basin was supposed to be part of Pakistan.First you agreed that Nehru was not a fool and now you will agree with me that he was very pragmatic.Lucky for India to have such a leader at that crucial time.Sad for us that we lost Mohammad Ali Jinah so early.As for refusing UN's permanent seat in favour of China in those days too was Nehru's pragmatic mind working behind the clever idea of gaining favour of China against Pakistan.God bless
ET please allow me o respond o someone who has written to me quoting facts.
@yousafhaque: Please detailed description of the war and determine who was on the ascendat - India who recaptured, Uri, Poonch, Tithwal, Jhanger or Pakistan who was systematically being pushed back? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/08/AR2010110800495_2.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2010110402773
Nehru was not a fool but he was not pragmatic - rather he was idealistic. Why else would he have refused a permanent seat on UN security council and recommended that China get it instead? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/08/AR2010110800495_2.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2010110402773 Please note: i am quoting Washington Post.
Pakistani history also says India attacked Pakistan in 1965 (not true) and hence september 6 is celebrated as defense day to celebrate the war that Pakistan started. When India had captured far more of Pakistani land than Pakistan had of India, Ayub wisely agreed to a ceasefire per whose terms both countries returned the. Part they had won. While this actual greatly benefitted Pakistan, they were angered since they. Had been old all along that Pakistan was winning. In 1971 until December 15, Pakistanis were told that the Pakistani army was winning and crushing Indians.
Please review any objective history (not written by Pakistani or Indian) to ascertain facts. You all have been repeatedly misled and hence lessons are ot learnt. India acknowledged defeat in 1962, defense minister lost his job and defense was strengthened. india has not lost a war since then.
@Gp65::Nehru the first PM of India was not a fool as you say rather he was a very clever person who knew that Indian army had no experience of mountain warfare and were unable to face the onslaught of Pak army along with mountain-war-hardened Wazirs (A fact that was proven soon afterwards during Indo-China Skirmish in Himalayas).He then very wisely took the matter to UN knowing well that once the Pak advance was stopped he could always back-out on his promise till he prepared his own army to fight in the mountains.Or else by gaining time he could always deny that he had ever made any promise to solve the Kashmir issue,A fact that enabled his successors to claim that Kashmir was an 'Attoot Ang' of India.I suggest you read Indo-Pak history after removing the glasses of bias so that you can better see and understand the facts of partition in '47.Your leader was not a fool:we were,to stop at present day LOC
@yousafhaque:
Careful, you have got another Indian historian with reflexive reaction but poor receptors who has the advanced knowledge of the Maharaja as well as the Tribesmen; The Maharaj did not run away and his army did not vanish in thin air, and the Indian rulers had not agreed to the grand plan of partition, muslim majority areas forming an independent country of Pakistan? I guess that these so called Indians, the name given to the natives by the anglo saxons, will even dispute that Express Tribune is a Pakistani National News paper and not associated with Indian Hindu Times.
Rex Minor
@yousafhaque: You have your facts wrong on what happened in Kashmir. When the tribals attacked, Kashmir was independent and Hari Singh had not decided whether to go with Pakistan or India. They advanced and were close to Sri Nagar when they got busy with looting and raping. Maharaja asked India to help but India said it would not intervene unless the Maharaja signed the instrument of accession. Once that happened, the Indian army pushed the tribals back o the present point and would pushed out the tribals completely if Nehru had not foolishly gone to UN to complain about Pakistan attacking India. UN then ordered ceasefire and rest is history.
Agree.
Having experienced the nightmare of IDP in swat operations which was only minimal compared to this one, the govt should have planned well regarding housing, health, work, and education of the IDP in this operations rather than leaving that responsibility to the UN.
In any case, I was horrified to learn that Sindh and Punjab restricted their entry into their provinces, which is unconstitutional. If the restriction is based on the apprehension that the newly arriving IDP will be diluting the demographic makeup, then both KP and Balochistan have a legitimate claim to exclude Sindhi and Punjabi folks form their land.
Other than the militancy, there is also the underlying discontent of Pashtuns against PAK and their preferred movement towards Afghanistan should be a worrying trend for PAK. After the US-NATO, PAK will have to deal with serious ramifications of IDP.
I would not be surprised that the issue of Durrand line comes up in full force.
Lets face the fact. International Terrorists, anti Pakistan elements could never have strengthened without support of the locals. In On Guerrilla Warfare, Mao Tse-tung “The Locals are like water and insurgents is a fish who inhabit it” Insurgencies are only able to operate so long as they maintain the support of the local population in their areas of operation. The guerrillas operate by blending into the local population and relying on locals for assistance. Waziristan is that pond which provided new recruits, food,shelter and, critically, sharing information on government troop movements in the area. The center of gravity in this warfare rests with the civilian population of FATA. Terrorism developed as a new business in FATA extended to media, banks, Judiciary & Lawyers. Billion of $s are flowing in this industry at the cost of blood of innocent people of Pakistan. I support Pakistan Army and accepts them with necessary collateral damage that will occur in the process
Poor handling of the situation by the government of Pakistan, I must say. People living as refugess in theior own country and being denied entry into some 'prosperous' states is a lamentable act in itself.
I wonder how bombs differentiate between civilians and terrorists..!
Such action only for prosperity of two states of Punjab and Sindh. Disgusting.
@unbelievable:::Good to see that you have complete grasp over the knowledge of life and history of tribes in North.After reading your comment I am of the opinion that the author should have consulted you before writing his article.You,I am sure,could give him very valuable suggestions.btw whatever Kashmir's portion that Pakistan has in possession today is due to the fact that the same tribal people,whom you accuse of being terrorists,snatched it from Indian army and they were about to take whole of Kashmir if the then government had not agreed to India's offer to take the matter to UN and declared a ceasefire at where the line of control (LOC) exists today
@Pir Roshan:
You are reminding the students of history that the cities that you mentioned,, accomodating lforcefully evicted Pakhtuns from their dwellings, were part of the greater Afghanistan, under the rule of Amir Abdul Rehman, before getting caught during the Afghan war against the British. The people of KPK who turned down Bacha Khan in 1947 have no longer the justification to stay as part of new Pakistan?
Rex Minor
The only sane person in PTI.
The IDPs are only accepted in Bannu, DI Khan, Lakki Merwat, Karak & Kohat because of geographical compulsions. They are accepted with great honour & respect in Khost, Paktia, Paktika Afghanistan because they know the pain of a refugee. Besides Afghanistan is as stable as Pakistan. If I am an IDP, I would prefer to go where I am accepted & respected. After humiliating body searches & all the hardships I will not take orders or lectures where to go. Mujahid Siraj hul Haq want these IDPs to return from Afghanistan & Mujahid Gul Bahader want them to go to Afghanistan. Too many mujahids & too much Pakistani nationalism has made life of common Wazirstani unbearable. Please leave them alone, we have done enough to make them IDPs in the first place.
If the author is correct and the military knows where the bad guys are hiding and elected not to attack those hide outs .. why does that equate to poor planning rather than collusion or criminal negligence?
very well written sir, Pakistani nation needs to be united and sacrificing whatever they can for the survival of our innocent tribal people who are sacrificing hugely for the country's future stability. We should not left them alone in this troublesome time.
Old solutions may not apply to new problems ... nobody condoned suicide bombing in the Afghan/Soviet war and the Afghan warriors didn't target civilians. Your dealing with terrorist now not "militants' -- and the tribal leaders that the author believes are the solutions are the same leaders who apparently can't distinguish militant from terrorist. In short - they maybe part of the problem. It's time for the elected govt of Pakistan to take control of all of Pakistan and quit subcontracting it's responsibilities to tribal elders or anyone else.