That strike 10 years ago had claimed the lives of six people, including Nek Mohammad.
According to the The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, since June 2004 there have been a total 385 drone strikes inside Pakistan. The strikes have killed approximately 2,306-3,735 people.
The CIA campaign, along with its claims of important targets such as Taliban commanders Nek Mohammad and Hakimullah Mehsud, has sparked anger in Pakistan and in many quarters of the world about its collateral damage and of jurisdiction to use the lethal weapon.
Of the total people killed in the 385 strikes, between 416-957 were reportedly civilians. Of these, 168-202 were children.
During the tenure of former US President George W Bush drones struck 51 times in Pakistan. But the figure multiplied almost seven fold during the tenure of his successor, Barack Obama, who is said to have signed off for a total 334 drone attacks so far.
While the US has not shied away from using the platform in other theaters such as Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia, the manner in which it concentrated attacks in Pakistan for the longest time, have made it the focal point for rights activists to hold the unbridled campaign to account.
The attacks have divided people along the lines of those who deem it as an important platform to tackle an imminent threat, to those who are seeking justice for the extrajudicial assassination of their family members in almost every court of the world.
The subject has drawn thousands of words in newspaper columns, hundreds of minutes of documentaries, even a giant installation of a girl child at the site where a drone missile killed her.
A UN resolution “Protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism” was passed in December 2013, calling for regulating the use of remotely piloted aircraft against suspected terrorists and urging US to ensure that any measures taken or means employed to counter-terrorism, including the use of remotely piloted aircraft, complied with international law. This seems to have done little to dissuade the US campaign of using drones to strike at their targets.
The latest strikes on June 11 and 12, which occurred after an unusually long gap of almost five and half months, left at least 16 people dead. The strikes were a reminder that this war is far from over.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Innocent die mostly due to few reasons: Extremist use public as shield & shelter for the same purpose. Extremists take their families with them due to their cultural life style. The killers don't want to die alone but want to leave such print stories for others' ease and political use later.
The war against terrorism is an irrevesible process and will keep on going in the comming years . The action of Drones have been permitted by the world community to avoid the loss of armed forces . The loss of innocent people is avoided but many a time these people provide shelter to the terrorists due to poverty, fear and religious brotherhood that is why they also pay the cost but the use of Drone should continue all over the world . Now itls use in Iraq is urgently required .
@Stranger: And so the first lines of Taliban "National Anthem" was born.
Anyone ever wonder why no "journalist" who writes about drone attacks has ever stepped foot in N Waziristan? The infamous Bureau of Investigative Journalism is an anti war group which sits in the UK and accumulates it's data via Internet searches - nothing scientific or accurate about that method.
Pakistan army is fully co-operating with CIA's war against terror.Pakistan army is at war with its own people from more than 10 years because they are paid for this war.If in case, an enemy attack on Pakistan, Pakistani leaders and army official will directly contact CIA chief and President of United states.
This News that Drones have been visiting Pakistan unmolested for a decade has given me the solution for a Pakistani nature conservation problem. The simple solution for protecting the endangered Houbara Bustard in Pakistan is to have them all declared as being a United States Drone . Given that there has not been even one recorded attempt by anyone in Pakistan to shoot down a US Drone, one can be assured that Houbara Bustard will enjoy complete immunity from harm if they are declared to be US Drones.
Here a DRONE , there a DRONE . every where a DRONE DRONE ....
A decade on,the terrorists haven't shown any sign of stopping either.Unfortunately as long as terrorists are there intent on killing innocents and attacking other countries,the drones will be there.
@Major Iqbal: Brief and funny.
Dear drones, keep coming annihilate the terrorists from our soil. A Big Thank You.
I would ask all to wonder if there would EVER have been drone strikes inside Pakistan IF those world famous terrorist safe havens were not provided by Pakistan for their beloved Good Taliban "assets" (Afghan Taliban/Haqqani group!)??? Turning a blind eye toward militant groups who ONLY launch terrorist attacks in neighboring countries has cost the country dearly over the last decade!
Well the F16s are also in the vicinity right now. Why not shoot the drones down.. if we really don't support these drone attacks.
US drone will be the only foreign airline willing to travel to Pakistan.