At Pakistan’s request, Russia is expected to sell some military equipment to Pakistan. This will include MI-35 helicopters, communication and transport equipment and some other equipment needed for countering terrorist activities.
The softening of Russia’s attitude towards Pakistan is a part of the changes that are now taking place in Russia’s global disposition. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union in December 1991, Russia’s economy did not warrant any confrontation with the West, especially the United States. It sought Western and especially American financial support to put its economic house in order.
After overcoming initial economic handicaps, Russia is now pursuing greater autonomy at the global level. It resisted the US policy of building military pressure on Iran with reference to its nuclear programme. It came to the rescue of Bashar al-Assad in Syria in the face of opposition by the US and some Arab countries. Russian policy towards Ukraine (2014) is another example of aggressiveness in foreign policy in disregard to the pressures from Western countries.
While maintaining priority relations with India, Russia is expanding its interaction with Pakistan as a part of its efforts to expand its foreign policy options in South Asia.
The earlier effort to upgrade the relationship between Pakistan and the Soviet Union was made in 1965-1970. This began with President Ayub Khan’s visit to Moscow in April 1965. The Soviet Union sponsored and hosted the dialogue between Pakistan and India at Tashkent in January 1966 to cope with the negative fallout of the September 1965 India-Pakistan War. India and Pakistan signed the Tashkent Declaration in January 1966 for normalisation of their bilateral relations on the initiative of Soviet Prime Minister Alexei Kosygin, who later visited Pakistan in April 1968 and May 1969. Two Pakistani military delegations visited Moscow in June 1966 and July 1968. A Soviet military delegation visited Pakistan in March 1969.
These visits resulted in the Soviet agreement to supply a limited number of military equipment and weaponry to Pakistan during 1968-1970. The Soviet supplies included T-54-55 tanks, MI helicopters and their spares, 130mm guns, jeeps and trucks. This relationship came to an end in 1971 when the Soviet Union decided to stand by India in the latter’s military action in East Pakistan by providing military supplies and extending diplomatic support. ZA Bhutto revived the Pakistan-Soviet relations marginally in the early seventies.
The Soviet-Pakistan relations were at its worst in the decade of the 1980s when Pakistan joined with the US, Saudi Arabia and other conservative Arab states to build Afghan resistance to Soviet military presence in Afghanistan.
Now, there are no direct conflicts between Russia and Pakistan. There were several diplomatic exchanges in 2012-2014. They talked of improving trade and Russia offered technical help in the energy sector and for upgrading the steel mill. The Gazprom Company showed interest in building a pipeline in Balochistan for the Iran-Pakistan Gas Project. These offers dissipated because the two sides did not adopt follow-up measures.
Important visits between Pakistan and Russia in 2012-2014 include Pakistan’s foreign minister’s visit to Moscow (February 2012); the Russian foreign minister’s return visit in October 2012; Pakistan’s air chief and the army chief visited Russia in August and October 2012, respectively; President Vladimir Putin’s visit to Pakistan in October 2012 was cancelled due to the problematic security situation in that month; Russia’s air force chief and army chief visited Islamabad in April and August 2013 respectively. The important visits in 2014 include the meeting of the Joint Working Group on counterterrorism in Islamabad (January), and Pakistan’s defence minister travelled to Moscow to participate in an international conference (May). He met with Russian officials during his stay. Parliamentary and technical delegations were also exchanged. Pakistan’s participation in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) as an observer enabled the Russian and Pakistani top leaders to interact with each other.
Pakistan can expand its ties with Russia if it addresses Russian concerns about the presence of militants from Central Asia and Russia in Pakistani tribal areas. The dissident and unhappy activists from Chechnya and the adjoining areas of Russia are known to be visiting tribal areas for refuge and training. Russia is also concerned about the connection between Pakistani tribal areas and militants from Central Asia, especially from Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. As Russia maintains strong interests in the security of states of Central Asia, it wants that no Central Asian militant finds a safe haven in Pakistani tribal area.
Pakistan’s army chief General Raheel Sharif visited China earlier this month. The issue of Chinese militants (East Turkestan Independence Movement) crossing over to Pakistan’s Gilgit-Baltistan and the tribal areas was raised by the Chinese leadership. A recent UN report claimed that some Pakistan-based militant groups engage in violence in Afghanistan and in some Central Asian states.
It would be extremely difficult for Pakistan to maintain productive relations with the international community, especially the neighbouring states, on a long-term basis if Pakistani territory is continually used by Pakistani and foreign militants for their violent activities inside and outside of Pakistan. The assertion of the primacy of the Pakistan state on its territory is a prerequisite for an effective foreign policy management.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 15th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (20)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Putins visit was to Pakistan was cancelled due to security issue THAT MONTH, what about all the other peacefull months since. LOL
The author assumes that both Russia and Pakistan would show flexibility towards each other but fails to address the root cause of Pakistan's obsession with India and Kashmir. All evils actually emanate from this mentality. If Pakistan sheds this obsession, it would not need to create strategic depth and assets. Instead, it would turn into a welfare state but such thoughts will take a long time to convert into reality.
Pakistani liberals have always had a soft spot for Soviet Union, now Russia, so your article isn't surprising. And while I don't hold any prejudices against anyone, I'd certainly be cautious. Why? Look at Russia's track record. Most bilateral relationships Russia has are based on some sort of blackmail or eventually become one. Not that United States is any different when they blackmail or listen to the phone calls of the entire world.
@shahid: "... unless we are conceding that the five “stans” of central Asia are still Russian occupied colonies...."
the five stans of cenrtal asia are ujbekistan, kazakhstan, turkmenistan, kirgizstan and tajikistan... Are you still considering Afghanistan to be your colony???
Right now Pakistan is dealing with Uzbeks. If it tries to cozy up with Russia, Chchens would be after it too.
@VINOD: Wish you had read my posting carefully. Further understanding the theory of international politics is not a piece of cake for every Harry, Tom, or Dicks.. So relax and sit back.
I am disappointed with Shahid's comment, and what makes it even more startling is the mentality behind it. It is so absurd that its laughable. It is that very mentality which has led us to the present situation. We as a nation ceased to exist when we signed up to all these American jihads way back in the 80's! Hamaree halat to daikho Shahid sahab? before you sign up for new American inspired and Saudi funded jihads! Let us as Pakistanis have a look in the mirror please? shall we? Where do we stand as a nation? or are we another ISIS/ Nusra or would you prefer the Free Syrian Army?
There must be a way to somehow politely refuse this poisonous Saudi funding of the Pakistani state. There's gotto be!
@Lal Din: You have rightly said "Finally! The right approach. In the dominant tradition of international politics (realist school), there are no friends or enemies but the national interest reign high." But can we say the same for Pakistan That national interest reign high. If so, why so much tension created with all neighbouring countries on the score of permitting terrorists to use your territory and creating the concept of good and bad terrorists.
Finally! The right approach. In the dominant tradition of international politics (realist school), there are no friends or enemies but the national interest reign high. Wish our government would have understood and taken such steps much earlier. I would urge Prof. Askari sahib and other opinion-former to emphasize more on such developments. Thank you Sir.
Your forced to cozy up to Russia because of your duplicitous policies and reputation as Nexus of Terrorism - but nobody wants to get in bed with someone who is associated with terrorism. They may sell you weapons but don't mistake that for friendship.
"Pakistan can expand its ties with Russia if it addresses Russian concerns about the presence of militants from Central Asia and Russia in Pakistani tribal areas." This is the "gale ki haddi jo picha nahi chodti" A boiling pot of terror, Epicenter of terror and what not. Please take help, coordinate and cooperate with your neighbors and let us fight together to get rid of this pain for ever. You have fought enough war on terror for America; please once fight for peace and progress of our own region our own people.
@shahid: Another denial and justification in favour of terror groups. We had a brief whiff of EMERGENCY RULE in India and learnt our lessons. Tell me why so many in Pakistan so fond of generals and boots?
@nadeem: Insightful comment.
The last time I checked there is no common border between Pakistan and Russia, unless we are conceding that the five "stans" of central Asia are still Russian occupied colonies. In what capacity the Russians are negotiating/pressurizing Pakistan? And why are liberal analysts emphasizing the importance of why Pakistan should accept this Russian position?
In the above sentence, you can replace 'Russia' with 'China', 'Iran', 'Afghanistan', 'India', 'USA', 'EU', and the sentence would still be valid. Problem is, these militants now have a domestic purpose too: they help the military keep its lock on the levers of power in Pakistan. So why would the Pakistani (deep) state want to give them up?
What can Pakistan give Russia, besides a headache?
At the moment , hundreds of thousands of Pakistanis have started to miss the era of Parvez Musharraf saying that democracy can't function in a nation like Pakistan, plus it's an open secret that the present Nawaz-Administration partially or as a whole can't afford or intend to disappoint Saud royal family. National commitment always takes a back seat when it comes to establishment.
The Communists/Socialists/Marxists suffered the worst under regime of (Late) General Zia-ul-Haq, and we have religious clerics who brainwash with distorted history and stories. In such a scenario our relationships with China and Iran also worsened and now we desperately need people who have enough guts to take on Saudi influence and religious intolerance.
All these religious militants simply serve American and Capitalist interests in the region with or without their knowledge. If some leftists or Marxist groups in Pakistan take up arms and reply Islamist groups in their own language, then it's going to be way better for our future since that's what is required.