Border management is critical for ensuring peace and stability in the region. The greatest challenge is security governance and for that Pakistan will have to establish the writ of the state in North Waziristan and clear pockets of resistance in South Waziristan, Bajaur, Mohmand and Khyber. Similarly, Afghanistan should take control over areas adjacent to the Pakistan border where mostly the Taliban exercise control. Pakistan and Afghanistan have no other option than to cooperate and compromise in order to address shared security concerns. But the question remains: is there a consensus for taking action against the militant groups that are in control of those areas and continue to commit cross-border raids with impunity? And are the two countries capable and willing to fortify the border? So far, both sides have been unable to clear the sanctuaries and contain the insurgency in their respective countries.
While this remains a major hurdle, the other area where both countries should cooperate is by regulating the movement at main crossing points on the border. They should introduce the biometric system and only permit those persons to cross over who are legally authorised. True, there are innumerable unauthorised crossing places, but due to difficult terrain, these take longer to cross and are more problematic when it comes to carrying weapons or moving fighters. The question of the Durand Line should also not be an obstacle to regulating the border.
Pakistan’s and the region’s interest lies in a negotiated settlement between the Taliban and the Afghan government. In the past, Islamabad had been making efforts with the Quetta Shura and the Haqqani group, but with little success. If some compromise can be worked out even at this late stage, it will greatly contribute towards stabilising the border. If we are unable to convince the Haqqani leadership and Quetta Shura that they should work out a negotiated settlement with the Afghan government, then what have we gained by hosting these groups apart from inviting the hostility of the Afghan government and the international community and much worse? For it has bred a culture of militancy within our country and given an excuse to Afghanistan and India to harbour and promote anti-Pakistan militants most prominent among them being Fazlullah, the nominal chief of the TTP. What we must recognise is that for the militants, the Afghanistan-Pakistan border presents an integrated theatre of operations and we should strategise our response accordingly. And this is only possible if both countries address their own insurgency problems and cooperate with each other. The sanctuaries present are a great challenge as was experienced in Vietnam, Cambodia and Algeria. When insurgencies enjoyed protection and support from neighbouring countries, it became difficult to crush them.
Thus the evolving strategic and political scenario demands that Pakistan should revisit its policy with neighbours. It should be based exclusively on state-to-state relations and not rely on a mix of state-to-state and state-to-militant relations that has been the practice in the past. Even if the fluid situation in Afghanistan did make sense of that policy in the 1990s it has totally lost its relevance in the post-2014 situation.
There are two major factors that will require a shift in the policy. In order to contribute towards Afghanistan and regional stability, the support to Afghan Taliban and its affiliates has to cease. The Taliban cannot be considered a convenient hedge even if there is no negotiated settlement that results in civil war. The previous policy of using insurgent groups as allies and using them as proxies against India and Afghanistan has been a huge failure. There are still doubts whether the Pakistan military is willing and capable of acting against these groups. But we cannot continue to ignore the presence of Afghan and foreign militant groups along with the TTP that are using North Waziristan to launch attacks against Afghanistan and within Pakistan. If Pakistan and Afghanistan were to take each other’s insurgencies seriously and cooperate, it would be far easier to counter them. This cooperative approach will also solicit international support and goodwill that Pakistan needs badly.
With the withdrawal of US and Nato forces, Afghanistan will be undergoing a political, economic and military transition. This poses a great challenge for the new Afghan government for its stability and much will depend on how well it handles these transitions. Interestingly, the fluid situation poses many uncertainties but it also opens up new prospects of cooperation. The election of a new president provides an opportunity for Pakistan to place the relationship on a stable and more enduring basis. For it would be in the interest of the Afghan president to seek good relations with Pakistan to succeed at home, notwithstanding that Afghan presidential front-runner Abdullah Abdullah had an adversarial relationship with Islamabad in the past.
There are doubts raised about the US’s and the international community’s commitment to provide funds to sustain the Afghan armed forces for nearly a decade. In all likelihood they would, because Washington realises the dangers inherent in abandoning Afghanistan. Without a viable Afghan economy and adequate security there can be no development, which is so necessary in order to give credibility and authority to the incoming government in Kabul. The financial commitment by the international community will also signal a powerful message that the US and other countries are committed and have a long-term interest in the region. It will also give Pakistan and other neighbouring countries greater confidence in the future of Afghanistan.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 11th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@ Rex Minor, General Sahib understands it, and you should too, that leaving Afghanistan alone and cleaning up your own house is not possible without addressing the fundamental policy issues on good terrorists and bad terrorists ... Pakistan can not have its cake and eat it too ... you can not cherry pick ... either you have both, or you have none ... and most importantly, Pakistan can not succeed with out cooperation from its neighbours ... therefore, as the article suggests, it is time for Pakistan to make a choice ...
Mr Talat Massood,
General, it is time that Pakistani leadershp leave Afghanistn alone, make suggestions for a clean up of the front of your House.
Rex Minor
@Afghan Maihan
You either have a short-term memory or don't wanna accept BASIC facts. Pakistani intelligence was on the ground in soviet jihad. Pakistani supplied weaponry was the game changer. Stingers changed the game that PAKISTAN SUPPLIED. Every single Afghan leader lived in Pakistan to find military/intelligence/ political backing. Which history are YOU reading ? The one that only talks about the Taliban and completely FORGETS about the soviet Jihad?
ET: Why are you NOT publishing my comment? I frankly don't see anything wrong in what I said
I like this clear mesage Sir:
`` "It should be based exclusively on state-to-state relations and not rely on a mix of state-to-state and state-to-militant relations that has been the practice in the past. Even if the fluid situation in Afghanistan did make sense of that policy in the 1990s it has totally lost its relevance in the post-2014 situation". Startegic Assets have destoryed Pakistan's internal structure,this assest has nvere been favorable for Pakistan. and now avoid to help non-state actors.
General Sab, Our 'Strategic Depth' has become our 'Strategic Death'. Only a "revisit" will not retrieve us of our self created mess, which for a 'few dollars/riyals more', the few beneficiaries are still playing their double games, and the their insatiable appetite has brought this country to virtual annihilation by a few thousand rag tags, pitted against a million strong Army, which happens to be the World's 5th. largest.
“Nations have no permanent friends or allies, they only have permanent interests.”
Lord Palmerston quotes (English Statesman, 1784-1865). “America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests” Henery Kissinger
Britain's Winston Churchill Winston Churchill once said that in international politics, only permanent interests, not permanent friends.
why complain if you feel betrayed
@komal,
I'll answer.Have you not seen the news lately where we have engaged these men who are fighting on our soil under cover of women and children. It's a guerrila war they are fighting against pak army in places where there's civilian population where as in soviet era they were fighting against an occupying force. I think it should be clear. Moreover 'peaceful India' keeping on supplying TTP with the latest weapons and giving them sanctuaries in their 'consulates' makes the job intense ;)
@khalid khan bangash: Ok Ok we all get it. Pakistan was responsible for ending the cold war. pakistan sacrificed its interest and because of its brave men America was able to bring soviets to its knees. In return, the thankless Americans ditched you and left you with militants(sorry freedom fighters) who on their own decided to re-group themselves and create terrorism against India, Afganistan and Pakistan. The whole world unfortunately gangs up on Pakistan when it is the biggest victim of terrorism. Only question the world is asking is the so called Brave men and the supreme Intelligence asset you have in your country be put to use to tame the so called terrorists,. If you can take on the mighty soviets, you could take on these terrorists too. Why are these guys developing cold feet taking action against these guys?
@Khalid Khan Bangash
I didn't know Pakistan made stingers and supplied it to the Afghan Mujahidin. Pakistani intelligence was the game changer, how so? They pitted the Afghans against each other and invited foreign fighters that are wreaking havoc in Pakistan as we speak. Some of your Bangash brothers that are from the Shia sect are the targets of these militants/proxies created by your intelligence agencies.
Stop the conspiracy theories and the blame game. Pakistan is reaping what it has sown. You must be a young kid with no knowledge of the events that shaped Pakistan in the last thirty years.
I can't really fault you for your lack of information since the warped narrative in Pakistan is written and disseminated by ISPR.
Better to have a sensible Pakistan policy first and leave the Afghan policy for Afghans. No use of talking of Afghan policy when Pakistan is burning.
Very since-able suggestions. The army shall do the cost benefit for themselves. Yesterday attack on Karachi Airport was displayed around the world. It costs Taliban nothing but its economic cost on the new govt to bring business & investment is enormous. It will take another 10 years to get to the stage where they were a day before Karachi attack. It is highly advisable to remove the sanctuaries & support for all sort of terrorism against Afghanistan, Iran, India & China without any conditions & unilaterally. Only then you can gain the trust of all neighbours & they will respond in the same goodwill.
@Mann Naseh:
forgotten strategic depth so fast? Pakistan is the most hated country in Afghanistan - check out any study by anyone.....
Sir, No matter what happens, there are international propaganda forces at work which will blame Pakistan no matter what we do . Pakistani media is too soft to tackle the onslaught of an 8 times bigger adversary which currently is backed by the powers that be. What's more interesting is that our military aid in the soviet jihad is forgotten where Pakistani supplied stingers/pakistani intelligence on the ground were the game-changer but they like to pinpoint just the Taliban. This is double-standards. Moreover my hometown in Khyber and all parts of Pakistan have been run over by Afghans (millions) ,yet we are the bad guys. We should check the onslaught of this propaganda
The American's leaving maybe a lighting rod for these type of articles but the core issue has nothing to do with the USA - it's Pakistan providing aid/comfort to the Afghan Taliban. It's a failed policy which has justifiably labeled you as a supporter of terrorism and a duplicitous ally/neighbor. I suggest you fix that before sitting down at the table with the Afghan govt.
Zindabad Afghan-Pak dosti.