
Such are the bare bones of the story and it will quickly drop down the news agenda, as mass-murders of minority groups rarely hold the attention of the media beyond a day or so. There may be token strikes, or a protest march, but this is just another in a steady stream of atrocities that are carried out with seeming impunity by organisations that have long been proscribed.
It is said that intelligence agencies were forewarned of the attack. We cannot know if this is true or not, but it is not improbable. If true, it is a further example of the state taking a backseat when it comes to sectarian extremism, and choosing to award defacto immunity to a range of organisations that for largely cosmetic purposes, it has ‘banned’. The bans now in place are a farce. The state has neither the will nor in many cases, the resources to enforce the bans, and there are those within the security forces that are either fellow-travellers of banned organisations or silent supporters. Hotels packed with Shia pilgrims returning from Iran merit the very highest security. Failure to provide that level of security speaks volumes as to how committed the state is to the safety of all citizens. ‘Criminal neglect’ appears to be a reasonable assumption.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 10th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ