Modi's grand victory has been so cross-cutting that it has upset many forecasts, so much so that no opposition party is in a position to lay claim even over the office of the leader of the opposition. Indian democracy certainly deserves kudos for achieving such a remarkable feat, which gives the winning party a clear edge when it comes to pursuing its agenda without any political pressures.
In her article, Malhotra has talked about people’s concerns over the victory of a person under whose rule in 2002, as many as 1,000 Muslims were killed in Gujarat. She has also stated that Modi was never personally indicted by the Indian courts for the death and destruction of 2002. Here it is important to note that while the special investigation team set up by the Indian Supreme Court did not find any evidence against Modi and he was given a clean chit, anyone familiar with the criminal administration system of the subcontinent knows quite well how difficult gathering evidence against a sitting incumbent is, more so, if he is the chief executive of a state with a firm grip over the levers of power. The Court certainly gave him a clean chit but history has not.
The death and destruction in Gujarat was spread over weeks. The unfortunate killings of Muslims were likened by Modi to be the same as a puppy being run over by a speeding car. While riding on the tide of the Gujarat model, he remained indifferent to the plight of over 4,000 displaced families, victims of the pogrom, who are still languishing in ramshackle camps in his home state. During those painful days a so-called hands on chief minister preferred the law enforcement machinery to keep its ‘hands off' in quelling the spate of gruesome violence. He never felt the compunction to accept the huge failure as his responsibility as chief executive of the state. This happened in a country where public leaders, in the past, set enviable examples, quitting office even if they were not at fault. Considering the scale and duration the Gujarat massacre, it is clear that it was by no means an accident.
India has now moved full circle with its electorate having made a categorical choice. A party that vowed to bring economic growth and good governance, employment and empowerment has come into power. Modi will certainly be free from the political hecklings that mar a coalition government. It remains to be seen how he is going to deliver on his promises. A dual streak, however, is discernible in his political chemistry. His commitment to Hindutva as a hardcore Sevak places him in the mode of the Hindu supremacist who loathes Muslims, whereas his pro-business proclivities cast him in the role of a game-changer. The two streaks could run parallel on a tactical level in the short run but these are antithetical in the long run in a country known for deep-seated divisions, both at the regional and communal levels. His key test will be to bridge the trust deficit of Muslims without an expression of public remorse on what happened in Gujarat under his rule.
On our part, Pakistan has previously dealt with the BJP in the late 1970s as well as under Atal Behari Vajpayee. This time, however, there is a difference. Modi is not Vajpayee, a visionary statesman whose visit to Lahore in 1999, left an indelible mark on the minds of a large swathe of Pakistanis. On a personal note, I recall the hoodlums of a right wing party running riot on the road leading to the Lahore Fort where Vajpayee was being feted. Despite this, he remained unruffled and during his engaging speech, comforting his embarrassed hosts. He made another impressionable appearance on the plush lawns of the Governor House, enthralling the audience with his humour and deeply empathetic discourse. It is highly regrettable that the initiative taken by Vajpayee and Nawaz Sharif was scuttled through the Kargil misadventure.
Pakistan now has to move with great circumspection. We need to maintain our poise where form should be as important as substance. There is no point in being over-eager when it comes to dealing with the India-Pakistan relationship. The principle of reciprocity should be given importance while sounding out our Indian counterparts. One does not see any headway happening on territorial issues. Movement on trade should strictly be on the basis of reciprocity, keeping in view our national interests in the long-term. There is a need to look into the visa regime for divided families along with addressing the plight of fishermen from both countries who stray into each other’s territories. The LoC will continue to be a flashpoint. A multi-tiered monitoring system to prevent any untoward incident needs to be put in place. Perhaps, a leaf can be taken out from the success of the McMahon Line arrangement between China and India. Our foremost priority should be on confidence building measures minimising possibilities for undue hard posturing on both sides.
Pakistan also needs to reign in banned organisations and their leaders, who are under UN sanction, yet parading on the streets every second day while expressing so-called yakjehti with the Pakistan armed forces. Where were these protagonists when the brave sons of the armed forces were laying down their lives in the war against terror? The spectacle being put on by banned organisations may end up causing difficulties and become a source of embarrassment as they are not doing anything beneficial for our state institutions.
Modi's success will continue to remind his supporters that the key to his durability will be his performance in office. The Indian electorate has shown the resolve to banish all those who fell short on that count.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 9th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (28)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Assad pervaiz: The riots in Gujarat happened over 12 years back and since then there have been no communal riots inGujarat - not even a curfew. So it is definitely not a hman rights issue unlike the ongoing attacks on Shias of which the last one was just 3 days back.
Yes the riots were ferocious and very unfortunate. Are you unaware about what caused the feroricous reaction though? Would it be any different if 58 Hajis had been burnt alive in Pakistan by a mob of 2000 Hindus in Pakistan? Please note that 790 Muslims AND 254 Hindus were killed - so your characterisation that thousands of Muslims were killed is factuallly incorrect..All people responsible for riots have been convicted including 33 Hindus and Gujarat has been riot feee for last 12 years. Despite intense scrutiny and throwing the book on Modi, Congress has been unale yo estalish any complicity of Modi in the riots. Modi's stance is clear. If he is guiltyhe should be hanged - an apology is insufficient. If he is innocent then to brand him as a killer by making him apologize for something he has never done is pure and simple bullying.
Please note twice as many Muslims were killed in target killings in Karachi just last year and as many in 2012 and 2011 and so on as had been killed once 12 years back in Gujarat in a communal riot.
@Author
It is highly regrettable that the initiative taken by Vajpayee and Nawaz Sharif was scuttled through the Kargil misadventure. Pakistan now has to move with great circumspection. We need to maintain our poise where form should be as important as substance.
Sir, It is India that got stabbed in the back in Kargil. And yet Pakistan needs 'Greater Circumspection'?
Really?
@amir khan:
Dude.... This was a cultivated vote bank.. I too disliek Modi .. but one thing must be appreciated abotu this election in India... They have consolidated the most diverse right wing thereby making all smaller votebanks useless...
The majority consolidation which never happened as regionla parties were playing politics was acheived this time on a development , jobs, money for families plank.... so let the votebanks lie low and let muslims do somethign useful
1- start modernining eucation - madarassa as well as english educated schools 2- stop promoting hatred via some of the madarassah, theoelogical schools 3- Shun the Ulema who are promoting hatred and violence...[ Actually this should be first. Many of the like Bukhari claim they iwll lead masses, but they just want POWER.. nothing more.. They hardly care for the masses] 4- focus on education and self employment 5- build strong er society by integrating wiht communities wherever possible - dont make more ghettos... inside India ...This works against our development 6- Promote more educated muslims to lead schemes, organizations so that people see us beyond ulema and likes of osama...
Allah Hafiz
The writer says "His key test will be to bridge the trust deficit of Muslims without an expression of public remorse on what happened in Gujarat under his rule." May I humbly ask as to why this "key test' is not applicable on any one or any leader or any general sab in Pakistan to bridge the trust deficit of minority Hindu, Christians, Sikhs, Shias, Bohras, Aghakhanis, Sufis and so on. In reply to your "1,000 Muslims were killed in Gujarat" I am certainly not justifying their killings but tell me do you know how many non muslims were killed? Please, we know that every one killed was an Indian and every Indian of every community and religion will not rest till peace and justice will be insured. But who is there in Pakistan to ensure justice for, leave aside minorities, but even for muslims who are Bohra, Aghakhani and Shia and Sufi. Any body counting how many of them die every day X 360 days x 65 years. For you every Indian leader is visionary if he keeps talking about confident building measures, keep providing concessions in trade and commerce and keep smiling in spite of Kargils. Keeps hoping that one day you will close the terror tap and understand we are born of the same womb. I think this may not be the future. Future leaders irrespective of parties will ensure safety of this nation and its people. Only hope is a strong leadership in Pakistan who can take charge of foreign policy and base it on peace and not on hate.
1 No Mention of live burning of women and kids in Godhra. One should understand that such brutal behavior will attract riots. 2 Calling Vajpayee as visionary to oppose Modi, when just after his goodwill visit to Pakistan, Kargil adventure happened. One should understand that this type of adventure at such situation when one side is taking historical step, affects trust in long term. 3 No mention of peace in Gujarat in last 12 year.
Precisely the reason Indians are happy that Modi is at the helm of affairs.. It makes you people go bonkers in ensuring he gets negative attention...Loving it.
@Anwar Shahid: You are clearly misinterpreting what is being said. No one is saying that safety and security of Indians Muslims is not important. All that one is saying is that Pakistan interfering in India's nternal matters is unaceptable. In doing so, we consider Indian Muslims as one of us -Indian. It is the duty of civil society, media, governmen nd judiciary to work for aafety and security of all.
Talking about Gujarat riots of 2002 as though it os an open issue is also mischievous considering that those responsible for the riots were conviced and there were no riots in Gujarat for subsequent 12 years under Modi.
Since you are so concerned about human rights shouldn't you be concerned about your fellow Pakistanis who happen to be non-Muslims? Hey are the ones who are being forcibly converted or flee the country - not Muslims i India.
I am amazed at the response of the Indian readers who hastened to make a judgement of 'we vs . Thee' . The writer no where condones or suggests that every thing in Pakistan is honky dory . We under stand that Muslims in India are India's problem so long it does not assume a human rights issues like some international voices sharing concern on the violations of human rights or incidents of discriminations against minorities or marginal groups in Pakistan . The writer to my mind has raised a question about the vires of a leader who never felt the compunction to offer public apology what happened under his nose . A comment from an Indian reader is that the riots were confined to three days and not weeks . That proves the fury and intensity of the pogrom in thousand of lives were lost in such a short duration . The writer speaks of reciprocity . It does not come with most favoured nation status granted by India so long the move is scuttled through notorious non tariff barriers for which the Indian Bureucracy is known for .
My goodness! Every other day there is some article on Modi. There are more articles on Modi in Pakistan than in India. Guys, get over it. He was elected with Muslims vote. People are happy in India and they have lot of expectations from him. Give time a time and then you will have Modi subject for your article.
The author forgets the fact that India is a Hindu majority nation and Indians owe nothing to non-native religions. There nothing to fear as long as everbody lives by the rule of the land. Indian secular constitution makes sure that the rights of every religion should be respected.
Well, what most of the respondents have said is true. I fail to understand why Pakistanis are so much worried about Indian Muslims and they don't care about their own brothern in their own country. All Muslims in India are Indians and they are 1000 times better off than their counterparts in Pakistan. It will be better for Pakistanis to forget and worry about Muslims of India and start paying attention to their own people. We have cared and will continue to care our Muslims.
Pakistanis always talk of masker of 1000 Muslim in 2002 but very conveniently forget the root of it. That is 59 Hindus were charred to death by .....
Remember, even US had to salute to our judiciary. President Obama was the first to invite Mr. Modi to Washington.
You talk of reciprocity. Which reciprocity you have honored? India is a vibrant, progressive economy and is a force to reckon with in the field of Science and Technology. I am a regular reader of Pakistani News papers. Almost daily in one or the other News Paper some Pakistanis will boast that they are a nuclear power. This is sheer childish. Have you ever heard any nuclear power boasting about their capability?
We Indians sincerely want to have a brotherly relations with you- the Pakistanis. You are fundamentally of Indian origin. Your DNA matches with Us Indians far more than with that of Arabs.
(His key test will be to bridge the trust deficit of Muslims without an expression of public remorse on what happened in Gujarat under his rule). (Author)
If you are fond of short stories by Urdu/Hindostani writers of late 19th/early 20th century you might recall Munshi Premchand. His celebrated story "Panch Parameshwar" tells the tale of two ordinary villagers, close friends, one a Muslim other a Hindu, falling out on petty issue to the extent of becoming mortal enemies. In due course one of them gets elected by happenstance as the Sarpanch (head of local body) & as luck would have it when a case against his old friend-now-foe comes up for hearing, it's the casting vote of the Sarpanch that becomes critical. Does he now take revenge, swing to side of patronising magnanimity, bend rules or does he do the right thing in right manner? He does what the dignity of Chair of The Sarpanch expects him to do. And does it in style. The Man who is sitting today on the Chair where Nehru & Vajpayee sat is expected to display that rectitude & do the right thing by the Muslims without wronging Hindus.
@Anwar Shahid: Yes, Pakistan has no right to involve itself in the affairs of Indian Muslims. And no, we do not want to be elder brother to anyone in South Asia. Such puerile terms have no meaning in the modern world.
To let you know, I am not from the majority religion in India. In fact, the community I belong to is less than 1/5th the size of the Muslim community in India.
It is interesting to read the thought process of the Indians through their comments which speak for themselves about the issues rightly pointed out by the author.All of them have tried to defend Modi and asked Pakistanis not to bother about Muslims in India..They are not ready to treat Gujrat Massacre even as a human issue.What would Jayoti Malhotra say about it?
It is interesting to read the thought process of the Indians through their comments which speak for themselves about the issues rightly pointed out by the author.All of them have tried to defend Modi and asked Pakistanis not to bother about Muslims in India..They are not ready to treat Gujrat Massacre even as a human issue...Inst it this very attitude of the Indian majority which compelled Muslims to look for some arrangements for their protection?Unfortunately the Indians have yet to learn to behave like an elder brother a role that they think they should be granted in South Asia..
Indian electorate has come to a stage where it will not be moved by doles, appeasement or rhetoric. The message sent is unequivocal, perform or perish. If Modi can deliver on his promises he will survive a lot longer than his mandated five year term, else the prognosis is written on the wall.
This is exactly why India can't do much progress with Pakistan on border talks.
India can deal with Civilian govt. on trade, but border & lasting peace will only be achieved when Pakistan truly becomes a conventional state. i.e. when the civilian executive has firm control over army, and civilian govt. has last word on policy & foreign affairs.
Till then we can only have a charade of talks while the Pak Army pursues its agenda of 'thousand cuts' (which bleeds Pakistan more) and 'plausible deniability' (Which no one believes)!!
And Nawaz Sharif is not the leader who can gain back the control from Army. It is the people of Pakistan who have to find their own MODI.
The Indian Muslims are the bargaining power and pivotal force behind any political party to get a Majority in Lokha Sabha. If they tilt to left congress is the majority, if they are neutral, it is always coalition (NDA or UPA), if they tilt right it is right wing with a majority. Muslims of India are the real deciders (or rulers) behind any party(ies) that come to power. Congress used Muslims to get votes all these previous elections. They are tired of Congress, and hence they voted for BJP to give a chance. If BJP mucks this opportunity, then again the power will remain neural or shift to Left. If Indian democracy has any fame or progress it is due to the Indian Muslims. Pakistanis has to understand this in order to think out of the box. So Muslims of India can take care of themselves far better than Pakistanis about them selves. Before you Pakistanis go emotional just try to think out of the box and without being emotional and without letting your genes (that hate everything about India) to speak out.
"The death and destruction in Gujarat was spread over weeks."
Factually incorrect. Rioting in Gujarat lasted for three DAYS. How do people expect their opinion to be trusted if they don't even know basic facts?
You talk about reciprocity in trade. Good. India had given MFN. ststus to Pakistan on 2996. Enough saiid.
Secondly Indian Muslims are Indian and no concern of Pakistan. Indian civil dociety, mefia, juficiary are all there to stand up fir them if needed. Worry about your minorities who are being wiped . Heck worry about tge kalma goh Shia pilgrims who have just been killed an hour back in Pakistan. If Indian press reciprocates by giving wide coverage to what is happening to minorities in Pakistan - including their limited electorsl rights in a do called democracy, even the little respect tou have internationally will be shred to pieces.
Modi won a thumping majority in the alsst election. That is enough for Indians. Unlike your elections in Pakistan, Modi or his opponents did not cheat, neither was their any electoral farud.. Unlike in Pakistan where the losers including the great Khan, cry rigging, our opposition welcomed the mandate of the people and accepted defeat gracefully. We are proud of our democracy. We are proud of Narendra Modi.
The world should be praying for Mr. MOdi's success in being loyal to the constitution of India.
Pakistan is free to decimate its minorities?
While Pakistanis keep fixated on 2 nation theory, their imaginary doomsday predictions about Indian Muslims, there fear psychosis about Modi, India moves ahead with opening of Mumbai metro train to the public and proceeded to build it's first ever bullet train from Mumbai to Ahmedabad.
In this article, the author jumped from the Vajpayee's days of optimism to Modi's dark days of pessimism for Pakistan ... but how conveniently he skipped the entire decade under PM Manmohan Singh ... !! ... would he like to also throw some light on why even a quite gentleman scholar and a champion of friendship with Pakistan like MMS failed miserably ... ? ... his desire to visit Pakistan as a PM of India remained unfulfilled ... ??!!
After reading countless articles on Modi over the past few weeks on ET, it would be useful for those like the author and others in Pakistani media to remember that the horse left the stable a long time ago, precisely 67 years ago. Those Muslims who remained in India are Indians. Pakistan has no standing to involve itself in the affairs of Indian Muslims. In fact the sooner they get rid of this unwanted baggage, the easier it will be for them to deal with Modi.
"The Court certainly gave him a clean chit but history has not."
Modi has not yet been relegated to history sir. Modi history is the work in progress and let us wait till last line is written. We don't care how he finds his name in Pakistani history books, his name will surely be written in golden letters in India's history books.