The SPG looks after the security of the prime minister, former prime ministers and their families. “… I do not feel it will be correct for my children and me to avail of the facility of exemption of these checks while entering or exiting the airport when we are all travelling together,” adding that “it has been a source of constant embarrassment for my husband who has asked me on numerous occasions to have it removed,” her letter said.
Priyanka’s request for removal of security exemptions comes across as refreshing and eye-opening from the scion of one of the most influential family, which still constitutes the ruling elites of India. It is a telling show of conscientious decision, particularly by Priyanka’s husband Vadra, who considers this special treatment as discriminatory vis-a-vis other Indian citizens.
Contrast this with the ruling elites in Pakistan and one stumbles upon countless examples of how they appropriate discriminatory privileges — even if out of power — as status symbol.
Remember the VVIP protocol accorded to Hamza Shahbaz during his visit to Gujranwala a few months ago. Dozens of cars and the helicopter ride kicked up quite a bit of dust — both literal and political.
Here, ex-ministers, top bureaucrats, and generals keep (ab)using privileges that were once available to them in their official capacity. Across the border, even the generals walk out of their offices, mostly to ride back home in the small Maruti. Here, VVIPs often cause massive delays in flights since the airlines know well the cost of leaving the VVIP behind. Even nephews and nieces of the prime minister usually enjoy official protocol.
In contrast, Ms Gandhi has also made a special plea that while they are on the move, it should not cause inconvenience to other passengers. “Request you to ensure that when we are entering or exiting boarding gates there is no disturbance to passengers... Request security detail to behave in a manner that is discreet and strictly unobtrusive,” her letter reads.
On a London-bound PIA flight in recent years, for instance, the nephew of a former prime minister was accompanied by a senior protocol official up to his seat in the business class.
Wasi Zafar, General Pervez (retd) Musharraf’s law minister, represented another extreme of how the VVIP status drove the mighty ones insane. Zafar, drunk with power and an inflated sense of protection because one of his brothers happened to be a corps commander at that time, reportedly slapped an aviation officer at one of the airports after being asked to fulfill the travel requirements.
Even General Musharraf himself literally abused his VVIP status and the official authority as the virtual martial law administrator, particularly in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. In his anxiety being the interlocutor to the then US President George W Bush, Musharraf apparently granted the American marines a free ride in and out of Pakistan.
A senior protocol official had once told me that US Marines used to enter and exit the Islamabad airport without the legally required immigration procedures. This officer was himself witness to a C-130 flight, which flew into Islamabad — for which a flight from the Gulf was asked to delay its arrival. All American marines disembarked from the plane, got into special vans at the tarmac and left for the hotel in Islamabad. Puzzled and shocked, the officer asked immigration officials at the airport about the mystery. “Sir, they come and go and we are not supposed to document them,” the immigration official told the protocol officer.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 4th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (20)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
The theme of the article is understood. While one can appreciate Ms.Gandhi's request, it ain't going to happen and no govt in India want a nut case to try something mischievous.
However, discrete security measures without inconvenience to others is what expected.
As in the case of PAK issues, abuse by certain personnel can only be curbed, if the person abusing the system stops the practice. It cannot be expected at the security personnel level.
As for the GI Joes, well what can I say. The flight maifest must have been cleared at the highest level in PAK, since these GI's have to return back to the US immigration system. in any case Bush owned Musharaff !
@Author - "I fail to understand the trivial responses to the mention of Priyanka. Please realize I tried to use this with a design and intent of highlighting the malaise of VVIP protocols that the ruling elites in our countries enjoy"
Sir... Your intention is fine.. however the example was bad... The Gandhis are no less crooks than your elites.. All this nautanki was after the realization that their security was going to be curtailed.... You could have used a better examples - from countries like Singapore etc.
Was this a write up on Priyanka and VIP culture........or was it a deserved backhand swipe at Musharraf ?
@imtiaz: Sir I can understand what you trying to imply here. Just FYI that security protocol to Gandhi family given by Hon. AB Bajpai during his tenure as PM to show that he care about security of his opponent family also.
"It is a telling show of conscientious decision, particularly by Priyanka’s husband Vadra, who considers this special treatment as discriminatory vis-a-vis other Indian citizens."
Surely the author jests! The Gandhi family and its hangers-on have sucked the country dry since independence, treating the people, the land and its resources as their personal property!
What position - political / economic / diplomatic does Ms Priyanka or her hubby hold that they get Z class security for all these years? And after all the yrs of having the security and special privileges, suddenly she is embarrassed of getting them?
Please don't give credit to an 'Indian' where it is NOT due!! Trust the ordinary Indians when they say our political class is equally bad or even worse than yours.
" “… I do not feel it will be correct for my children and me to avail of the facility of exemption of these checks while entering or exiting the airport when we are all travelling together,” " What this news item does not spell out is Priyanka's motivation for such sudden conscientious act which, however, is quite clear if one reads in-between the lines. There is a proposal to yank Robert Vadra's privileges which would leave such privilege for his wife's and his children's intact. Thus when they would be travelling together, this would create a dichotomy: wife and children would sail through but the husband goes through the normal drill "aam aadmi" has to go through. That is what Priyanka was referring to - the dichotomy. To escape such embarrassment, she requested that the privilege be yanked from the whole family if it was not possible to extend such privilege to Robert.
@imtiaz: Indians have taken aim at this VIP culture now. Kejriwal (AAP) exploited this sentiment to the fullest. Supreme Court too has banned sirens and red lights except to the deserving top leaders. As for Priyanka - she's is trying to act extra smart after BJP pointed out the unwarranted privileges enjoyed by her and her family. Vadra is a crook - less said about him the better.
You praise someone who has for a long time been exhibiting the same behavior that you are complaining about (namely her husband going around like a VVIP). And now you use for your support some trivial superficial thing she has done. Still you fail to understand the reaction?
Give example of British PMs riding in tube or Azim Premji washing his clothes or Narayan Murti or some real VIPs who do not suck public's money for their false prestige. You use wrong symbols and then fail to understand the reaction tells more about your lack of depth on this than the reader's triviality
@imtiaz: It's true that VIP-culture is obnoxious. But there are times when one wonders.. There was a big loss yesterday. A popular mass leader, Union Minister of Cabinet rank (and probable candidate for post of CM-Maharashtra) Mr.Munde died in Delhi of cardiac arrest caused by a road accident. He was on his way to airport traveling, as usual, in an ordinary sedan accompanied by an assistant & the driver. Lone vehicle. No outriders, no vanguard, no siren, no road-block, no irate citizenry. Result: no minister. The man who rammed his car in to the minister's vehicle walked up, gave a bottle of water to the injured man before he could be driven away to hospital & waited for cops. Just another day & another death.Avoidable loss!
Since the issue of many Pakistanis abusing VIP protocols has come up, I've got a question of my own: Several online articles (can be Googled easily) say Dawood Ibrahim lives in a posh house in a DHA complex in Karachi, and whenever he leaves around, he is escorted around by a bunch of Ranger squads guarding him. Is that true? And if it indeed is true, I wonder why does he need such special protection by forces that are supposed to protect the normal citizens of Pakistan from terrorists.
I fail to understand the trivial responses to the mention of Priyanka. Please realize I tried to use this with a design and intent of highlighting the malaise of VVIP protocols that the ruling elites in our countries enjoy. I didnt realise that readers in India would look at it through the non-Congress prism.
Priyanka's writing the letter directly to chief of SPG is out of form. She has no business to either demand or refuse security. It has to be a professional decision. Since 1989 kidnapping of Rubaiya Sayeed, college going daughter of the then Home Minister of India, which resulted in release of 5 militants in exchange for hostage, certain category of individuals can't refuse security on their whim. Nothing to do with person;country can't be held at ransom! Some seem to consider security cover to be only a status symbol-whether earned or unearned being the only debating point. For such a naive lot granting of Z-status a favour, withdrawing it is overdue punishment! It sure is no reward. Modi's wife-on-affidavit has been leading quiet life in a small town of Gujarat for decades. And yet as soon as his candidature was announced Gujarat police mounted 24*7 security for her & now she will have Z or Z-plus security. All that is against her wishes, destroying her tranquility, but she has little choice. That's the way it is.
What an article, It clearly show how writer does not know Pakistan. India is a peaceful country with pluralism. whereas in Pakistan pluralism is not tolerated plus there is two prong terrorism in country. what I mean is Pakistan as state practice terrorism plus it is private industry also e.g.. TTP.
Mr Gul, please clarify this piece is not a parody. The new govt is thinking of removing the special privileges unduly enjoyed by Robert Vadra. Priyanka wants to preempt that as a face saver by trying to giving up those privileges. Vadra is not a saint but involved in a variety of illegal land transactions. This family doesn't deserve any special privileges what so ever.
Priyanka used these privileges for 10 years and Vadra ever since he married Priyanka, without Either one ever saying that they did not want them. It is only now post election defeat when their family and its leadership is under scrutiny that she came up with this absurd drama.
Also it would be nice to know why so many laws were changed to allow out of turn land allotment to Vadra who has amassed a fortune of 300 crore rupees in 3 years flat with hardly any investment.
can you research a bit. Do you think Priyanka Gandhi did this on her own suddenly after many years. It had been in media with people questioning why her husband is getting the security. This is all typical natak. Your overall point is valid but weakened due to citing the most dynastic of the politicians. If there is any credit here then its probably Indian media and people who are getting tired of this nonsense
Hmmmm, I would wonder if anyone ever checked on just how Osama bin Laden (AND his entire extended family) avoided those pesky "immigration procedures" on their way to his security compound in Abbottabad!!!
Looks like the author totally bought into the fake drama made by Bianca Vadra or he has no clue about the Gandhi family
She doesnt warrant for a Z+ Security.She doesnt hold any office.She is not a member of parliament or Legistative assembly. LTTE are not going after as her father did...
This was just a blatant abuse of power made by the Gandhi family to show that they are royal and untouchable
I can understand the Security,but why should they not be frisked at airports.How are they being co-related??? Are the frisking officials the one who assassinate them.
Also,why her husband Robert Vadra got special "elite" privileges? He is just an eight class dropout.How come he became a billionaire even faster than Mark Zuckerberg?? How was he classified as a "poor farmer" and given thousands of acres of land at throwaway price.
There is a rumor that Vadra smuggled various antiques from India to a relative of Sonia Gandhi..
Personally asking govt to withdraw her security is like writing a resignation letter just when you are about to get fired.
When you go around the world doing 'chamchagiri' style of diplomacy what do you expect. You forgot to mention the Arab princes and their retinue that come to clean up the Houbara population for entertainment - do you suppose they stand in immigration queues? I don't suppose anyone in Pakistan dare ask a Chinese Offical any travel document too!!
We in India are eagerly awaiting Hillary Clinton's next visit to India - so she can be strip searched too - just like they did to the Indian Diplomat recently.