India trip: ‘Nawaz turned win-win situation into disaster’

Shah Mehmood Qureshi demands PM inform parliament of details of visit.


Our Correspondent May 29, 2014
PTI leader Shah Mehmood Qureshi. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD:


Former foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi has criticized Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s trip to New Delhi as one in which a ‘win-win’ situation turned into an unmitigated disaster.


Speaking with The Express Tribune on Wednesday, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader said that while the party supported the PM’s gesture and any efforts to make peace with India, the prime minister should have taken Parliament into confidence regarding his visit and evolved a consensual policy towards India. “It is important that peace is premised on mutual interests and benefits to ensure that it is long lasting,” Qureshi said.

It is incomprehensible, Qureshi said, as to why the prime minister did not mention issues between India and Pakistan such as ‘Indian-aided terrorism in Pakistan’, when his Indian counterpart had put forward clear demands to Pakistan regarding the same issue. “The prime minister failed to use the opportunity for a one-on-one meeting with his Indian counterpart to raise serious concerns Pakistan has over the water issue, terrorism and the stalled composite dialogue and the Kashmir conflict,” Qureshi said.

It was disturbing that for the first time a Pakistani prime minister visiting New Delhi officially failed to meet with Kashmir’s Hurriyet leadership, he added. Thus, the PTI leader said, the Pakistani nation was given a message of fear of Indian anger and appeasement.

Qureshi said the only concrete item mentioned by Sharif was special investments for Indians in Pakistan and his admission that he wished to be viewed as a friend of the business community.

“This uni-dimensional focus of Sharif’s India policy - which is in fact not a policy but a collection of short-term measures - on business interests betrays a lack of understanding on the overarching dynamics of the Pakistan-India relationship and the real conflicts that need resolution,” Qureshi said.

“It also begs the question of whether the PML-N government has put the composite dialogue on the back burner to further certain business interests with India.”

Meanwhile, PTI chief Imran Khan said, “We want peace on our borders, but we will see how Prime Minister Sharif represented us in his meeting with the new Indian prime minister.”

Published in The Express Tribune, May 29th, 2014.

COMMENTS (13)

truthbetold | 10 years ago | Reply

@MA khan:

"It is abundantly clear from history stretching back 30+ years that India supports separatist elements in Balochistan. Support to Taliban is an non-issue relatively . Balochistan is where Indian meddling is more pronounced. So your comments seem trivial or uninformed "

Assuming that is true, why shouldn't India support the Baloch freedom movement as a counter reply to Pakistan's proxy terror war against India in Kashmir and the rest of India that has killed over 60,000 Indians in the past 25 years? And then, there is the case of Pakistan's support for Khalistani terrorists who butchered 30,000 Indians from the 1980's.

While I don't advocate or support any internal interference in Pakistan, wouldn't the Indians be quite justified in "returning" the same that the Pakistan has been doing in India?

AM | 10 years ago | Reply

Stop cribbing mr. Qureshi....

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ