Normalisation of ties with India has been high on Sharif’s agenda since he took power last year. The government came very close to granting India the most favoured nation status a few weeks ago, deciding to hold back on the decision at the very last moment. The consensus seems to be that the first step towards normalisation will be increased trade with India. As trade brings the two nations together and builds confidence, stickier issues such as terrorism, Indian interference in Pakistan’s western regions, Kashmir, and Afghanistan will be brought to the table. For Narendra Modi’s government, terrorism will be top of the agenda and his government will want Pakistan to address this issue. Mr Modi will push Mr Sharif to take greater action against the perpetrators of the 2008 Mumbai attacks and prevent cross-border infiltration into Indian Kashmir. Trade will be a close second on the list, as the newly-formed Indian government would like to have greater access to a lucrative market in Pakistan. The BJP will be hesitant to discuss the Kashmir issue and will take a hard line on this, arguing that small steps must first be taken.
Initial reports coming out of Delhi following the short meeting suggested that terrorism was the only issue on the table. If this were the case, then Mr Sharif has already ceded ground to the Indian prime minister. A focus on terrorism and trade in the short-term might sound like a good idea for Mr Sharif, but ceding to India’s demand that Kashmir be tabled for the time being risks unleashing a wave of criticism at home. If the decision is made by Islamabad to push through trade and terrorism in the initial rounds of talks with Delhi, then Mr Sharif will be branded as weak by the hawks in Pakistan. Given that he is an industrialist, Mr Sharif will be under fire from the opposition parties who will claim that the Sharif family is pursuing its business interests at the expense of our Kashmiri brothers. If such a situation were to play out in Pakistan, then the already embattled prime minister will have to fight on another front and will find himself in a weakened position at home.
To prevent such an outcome the Nawaz government must develop a strategy that seeks to reach out to Delhi in a calculated manner, and the statement he read out to the Indian media seemed promising enough. While pushing through normalisation of ties through trade and terrorism, Mr Sharif must also seek to nudge India to reduce its footprint in Pakistan’s western frontier. It is no secret that the security establishment has a deep mistrust of India this would be seen as a positive step for the establishment. Furthermore, Mr Sharif must devise an effective strategy where senior members of his own party are able to effectively tackle the barrage of criticism at home and building consensus with like-minded opposition parties to ensure that the pushback at home is kept to a minimum.
The PML-N government can ill-afford to be reactive while pursuing normalisation of ties with India. With tempers and temperatures running high in the summer, it is essential the party devise a strategy that is proactive both at home and abroad. Negotiating with Narendra Modi’s government will not be relatively easy compared to the battle that must be fought at home if ties with India are to be normalised. Ultimately, the fate of the peace process with India will depend on how the Sharif government handles the issue at home, for failure to present a strong and united front in Islamabad will mean that the entire process will collapse from within.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 28th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (23)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Huma In 1940's the outcry was create and live in peace. There has been no peace in the subcontinent. Only realistic solution is to accept LOC. Is Pakistan going to get rid of non-Kashmiris to hold a referendrum? What about parts of Kashmir that Pak has ceded to China! Would both Pakistan and India accept an independent Kashmir state.
@Shakir Lakhani: Sir, i appreciate your concerns for Muslims living in India . How many would you like to migrate and settle down in Pakistan so you and other Pakistani can get good sleep knowing they are safe in Pakistan? I think every Pakisatni must answer this question before putting up any argument with Indians.
Lucrative market? The author is delusional. India itself is mammoth sized market for ourself yet to tap fully.Then we have rest saarc neighbours and countries around the world with whom india is in one of top three trading partners in world. Law and order, less purchasing power,resources factor is reason why people stay away from your country's market. But nawaz is pragmatic deal with india can make pakistan strng and boost its economy to spend on these factors. The only reason india wants trade with pakistan is because it will create more stability/peace in relationship, the hawks will think ten times before attacking because it will affect his own country trade/investment/economy. This will create trust cooperation and harmony in long run, that's the actual reason as it reduces animosity. Look at india and china are we worried about war? Wary? yes. competitions vis via each other?yes. But war? No. Both have billions $ worth trade and investment in each other's country, will both countries risk jeopardising that for meaningless war with nuclear armed country?Nope. It locks us up in close cooperation on world stage like it did with india and china. They stand toghter and counter the Europe and USA on various issues. Thats what both PM are looking for in this trade. Plus pakistan needs it with its current economical state, neighbour country trade will save money, comparative to other continent countries offering same things with transport cost. Indian corporate world is very strong and has great clout,resources,expertise. It can provide electricity and other things, just like it had done to srilanka and bhutan recently with 4-6 hydro power grids other projects etc.
@Shakir Lakhani: "Now that Art 370 is being abolished"
IS it now? Opening a debate on article 370 and whether it is relevant amounts to actually abolishing it?
Making stuff up are we?
@Shakir Lakhani: " ... I expect widespread riots in the whole of India in the next few months, and again Pakistan will be blamed. ... "
Wrong assessment. Read what leading Indian Muslims, including clergy have said about Article 370. They want it abolished because special treatment for Jammu and Kashmir means special treatment for Muslims. I expect huge demonstrations, not riots, by Muslims asking Modi to revoke Article 370. Wait and watch.
If the author has concluded this op-ed as his final conclusion of his study / thesis.... He will stay as a Masters student for all his life !!!
@Shakir Lakhani:
I expect widespread riots in the whole of India in the next few months
You sound like the weather department
@Shakir Lakhani: Well sir, there have been numerous attempt by Pakistan to shift the border to east by direct and indirect war and result is zilch. I think it may be the time we should work towards moving the border to west. May be that would work.
@Shakir Lakhani: "Now that Art 370 is being abolished, Indian Kashmiris will no longer be patient, the few that are in favour of India will also rebel." Who amongst Xinjiang Muslims are in favour of China? None. Do you see China quitting Xinjiang? Certainly not. If not, why do you think India will quit Kashmir? Territories, my friend, are the sole properties of the sovereigns that hold them. It is for them to treat what they hold as any piece of property - buy them, lease them, sell them, gift them. All through history that is how territories have changed hands. Never has a territory been gifted to the people living on it out of the goodness of heart. You and the so-called alienated Kashmiris cannot change this historical truth. Territories change hands only between sovereigns; people and other living beings on those properties are movable and do move if they can't stay under changed circumstances.
Kashmir issue will never be solved. For if it is, what will be the reason for the continued existence of the Pakistani Army?
As Upton Sinclair said, "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!"
@Huma: Pak politicians and the rest are certainly to be admired for their fight for the freedom of Kashmiris all these years.
I suggest Kashmir and Jammu be given to Pakistan lock, stock and barrel so that there will be peace and Pakistanis can hug the rest. No more hot, cold or proxy wars, but only peace.
"Kashmir is solved if Pakistan just accept LoC as international border". It's on the indian side of J&K that the people are fighting for freedom, so the border needs to be shifted eastward to give Pakistan the whole of Kashmir. Now that Art 370 is being abolished, Indian Kashmiris will no longer be patient, the few that are in favour of India will also rebel. And we know what'll happen if demonstrations break out: Modi will say Pakistan is responsible. I expect widespread riots in the whole of India in the next few months, and again Pakistan will be blamed. In fact, Modi and his cohorts would love it so they can say they failed because of Pakistan's support to Indian and Kashmiri Muslims.
Kashmir problem has no solution, at least unless any one out of India or Pakistan ceases to remain an entity.it is a catch 22 situation....India and Pakistan both are nuclear state so gaining territory by one at the cost of other's loss is a distant possibility..now converting LoC into intl border seems a good solution,but hawks on both the sides as well as Kashmiris will cry hoarse against this solution.rest other proposed solutions are hogwash...nobody is serious about them.
It should be an obligation to define "Solve Kashmir" whenever politicians and commentators refer to this matter. Generally, readers from Pakistan mean "Give Kashmir to Pakistan". Now let us be pragmatic and realistic.
@Huma: How do you propose to do that. Do you think India will ever accept anything short of Pakistan relinquishing its claim on Kashmir. Do you think India really needs peace with Pakistan for progress and development? Who need peace more - India or Pakistan? Ina ny card game, the guy worth the stronger cards win. Don't you think India has the best cards?
@Huma: Are you sure??? I don't think so. Any way, Kashmir is solved if Pakistan just accept LoC as international border otherwise another 100 years may go without any results. And if India could manage 65 years, it can certainly manage another 100. Pakistan on the other hand lost eastern arm already in the dream of Kashmir. Another loss may be devastating for many generations to come.
With Shia "brothers" and Ahmedi "brothers" being pushed off the bridge, hope Kashmiri "brothers" fare better.
India did not have so many soldiers on your eastern border/LOC prior to 1989. What changed? 1) the policy implemented in 1989 to infiltrate jihadis into India 2) Kargill
The force at the border/LOC is defensive in nature o prevent infiltration by state/non-state acors from Pakistan. In light of that until and unless the terror infrastructure is dismantled, it is unlikely that India pulls back people on the border/LOC.
Solve Kashmir and live in peace, once and for all.
Congratulations to the author for his sincere desire for peace that will bring prosperity to South Asia.