Afghan elections: Abdullah-Ghani run-off May 28

In the first round Abdullah won 44.9 per cent of the vote, followed by Ghani with 31.5 per cent.


Tahir Khan/web Desk April 26, 2014
Dr Abdullah Abdullah (R) and close rival Dr Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai (L). PHOTO: AFP/FILE

KABUL: Afghanistan will head into a second round of polls after no candidate secured 50 per cent of the votes in the April 5 presidential election, the Afghan election commission announced Saturday.

The head of the Independent Election Commission (IEC) Ahmad Yusuf Nuristani gave the breakdown of the partial results.

Former foreign minister Abdullah Abdullah is in the lead with 44.9 per cent of the votes, closely followed by former World Bank economist Ashraf Ghani with 31.5 per cent.





The two leading candidates will go to run-off elections rather than having talks about a coalition government.



https://twitter.com/omid_zaki/status/460059654677356545

The preliminary results are due to be finalized on May 14 after investigations into fraud complaints.




Candidates hit out at results

Fazal Oriya, Abdullah's spokesperson, told the media that "the results announced by the IEC are unacceptable for us."

Ghani's spokesperson, Dr Farooqi, also said that thousands of fraudulent votes were included in the final preliminary result which affected the statistics.




 After fraud allegations were made in regard to the votes, the IEC delayed the date of the announcement of the preliminary results (originally scheduled April 24) to ensure the results are free of suspect votes.

COMMENTS (9)

Ali | 10 years ago | Reply

i will give wode to the doctor abdullah abdullah

Shola e Jawad | 10 years ago | Reply

@ Mahmud Ahmad

I took the liberty of correcting your spelling errors for your handle. Arabs don't spell it the way you did.

Afghanistan is not going to break up and there won't be a civil war either. Those days are over, much to the chagrin of Pakistanis.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ