The second point I made was that Pakistan needs to solve its ‘identity dilemma’. Tomes have been written on this topic and recently I held a conference at the FC College which had identity as the topic of a major panel, so I won’t go into its contours. Suffice to say that unless Pakistan is sure what kind of a country it is — Arab, Central Asian or South Asian, it will not be able to have a consistent and firm foreign policy (or even a sound internal policy). How a country behaves in its region is very critical to its well-being and therefore, Pakistan must be cognisant of its implications. At the moment, we have quarrels will all but one of our neighbours and this simply does not bode well for us. Being confident in oneself is one of the basic criteria of a successful projection of power.
I also said several other things, but the above two points were picked up by Dr Shireen Mazari, the information secretary of the PTI. She argued that, “We as Pakistanis must think that we are the centre of the world” and that “there is no ‘identity crisis’ in Pakistan”. I was simply flabbergasted by these statements. While the first statement could be termed patriotic, harbouring deluded views is never in the best interest of a country. Patriotism means loving one’s country and love can never be based on false notions or else it falls flat. Self-realisation is the first step towards progress and unless Pakistan takes this important step, it will never really develop.
Dr Mazari’s second assertion simply left me at a loss for words. She stated that she was a Pakistani and she knew it, and that there was no confusion in it. Brushing aside such an important issue by someone who has a PhD in international relations is simply criminal. Dr Mazari knows well the contested nature of Pakistan’s identity and how it adversely affects the nation. Simply put, if there were no issues, there would have never been a Pakhtunistan movement, the Baloch would have never raised the banner of revolt five times, the ‘Muhajirs’ would have been only called Pakistanis, and there would be no local support for the Taliban. Such thoughts from someone so highly educated makes me sympathise more with the common man who did not have the privilege to study such issues in universities like Columbia.
There are times where I think there is too much debate in Pakistan on issues which are a bit too obvious and clear. However, events like these make me realise how a certain sense of delusion is advocated and promoted by certain circles. If the so-called forward-looking and modern PTI entertains such deluded thoughts, then what can we expect from the far right? Our ‘national’ debate on such issues needs to delve deeper into our society so that every citizen becomes an informed participant of such a debate — only then is real change possible.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 23rd, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (30)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Strategic Asset:
I am not paid by ET to provide infromation to readers who have not visited educational insitutions nor have they reached the PhD level and refer to wickipedia for knowledge! I have not given my opinion but a very limited info which is valid and concerns the article. You must ask Dr Khan Bangash if he agrees or disagrees with my comments.
Please note that I am not a Pakistan and If the author is having a identity crisis, tough luck for him, I have not detected it in other articles written by brilliant Pakistani writers.
Rex Minor
@Rex Minor: Besides, the entire population of homo sapiens migrated from the middle east
You make so many mistakes that perhaps you should go back to school. After this, I am definitely not going to reply to each and every lie you concoct.
Homo sapiens originated in Africa as accepted by most. Of course they would have migrated through the Middle East to reach eastern parts of Asia.
Maybe one day we may get evidence that they maybe originated in the Middle East instead. But still, what has that got to do with Pakistan that you are so excited? Also, one thing you can bet on is that not one of these were Muslims.
@Rex Minor: which coupled with the reforms of its anglo saxon educational institutions could very shortly become an industrial player in south East Asia.
Rex, your posts exemplify the "identity dilemma" the author so eloquently speaks about. In one post, you are excited about the Middle East In another post, you think Pakistan is in South East Asia!
@Rex Minor: Mr Khan Bangash teaches History and could tell the readers about the golden period of Indian history, which was certainly during the muslim rule!
You did not reply to what I posted. Instead you are trying to obfuscate matters.
Please read this Wikipedia article first to get some perspective. Until AD 1000, India was the world's largest economy. Subsequently it underwent a slow decline. The Mughal period you refer to saw many major ups and downs and India's share of world GDP declined to around 25 to 27%. This further went down to 3% by the time India got independence from the British.
Secondly, do you consider all Muslims to be Mughals? The fact is that many Muslims were living in abject poverty during the time of the Mughals.
Thirdly, neither were Mughals the only great rulers of India nor were all Mughal rulers good. The Cholas, the Guptas, the Marathas, etc. are also considered great if not better than the Mughals. Please look at the map of the Chola empire which stretched all the way to present day Indonesia.
Fourthly, unlike the British, by the time the Mughals were in their 3rd/4th generation, they were more Indian than their roots.
Finally, it is juvenile to admire the Mughals and hearken back to their time. These were all kings or dynasties who did things typically for their personal gratification.
For me, the golden era of India has only just begun. This time we are a democracy, the biggest in the world, with largely capable institutions and the framework that is being cemented into place today would allow us to succeed for centuries to come.
PS: I hope you were referring to the Mughals because the others were much more barbaric.
@you are a (shameless) Muslim Supremacist.
And truly a Minor.
ET censors my comments from North Korea, but they seem to like your comments. May be for your entertainment value.
@Strategic Asset:
Sir, Mr Khan Bangash teaches History and could tell the readers about the golden period of Indian history, which was certainly during the rule of muslim rulers from the middle east. Besides, the entire population of homo sapiens migrated from the middle east and not from Africa as was previously estimated! Have a nice day sir!
Rex Minor
@Strategic Asset:
Mr Khan Bangash teaches History and could tell the readers about the golden period of Indian history, which was certainly during the muslim rule!
Rex Minor
@Shahbaz Asif Tahir:
One must give full dues to the author Mr Khan Bangash who it would seem that at present is not prepared to accept that the Indian society is gradualy imploding and nothing short of a miracle is going to stop it. In contrast Pakistan democracy is getting out of the stalemate of prolonged military rule, and with its current Government is unfurling its creativity dynomics and entrepreneurial assets which coupled with the reforms of its anglo saxon educational institutions could very shortly become an industrial player in south East Asia.
Rex Minor
@Shahbaz Asif Tahir:
ival One must give full dues to the author Mr Khan Bangash who it would seem that at present is not prepared to accept that the Indian society is gradualy imploding and nothing short of a miracle is going to stop it. In contrast Pakistan democracy is getting out of the stalemate of prolonged military rule, and with its current Government is unfurling its creativity dynomics and entrepreneurial assets which coupled with the reforms of its anglo saxon educational institutions could very shortly become an industrial player in south East Asia.
Rex Minor
2nd revised version
History is a series of fictions which are written down by one, two or more writers who take on the task of writing it down through their individual prism. Its reading is of interest and equivalent to listening to mama stories, but very educative and useful, if one learns from it. The article is void of truth of reasoning for which the opposite is impossible,Perhaps we need a compass when we talk about Geography as well as the vision to appreciate about the potential of a country in right context. Neither the size nor its performance makes India as a regional leader but China definiely fits into this role!!! Besides It is the second largest economy of the world, whereas India according to the UNO has the largest population of illetrates and undernourished children in the world..
Rex Minor
PS. PhD is not more than the evidence that the individual has the capability to study and learn his choosen specialty.
@Rex Minor: The authors article has several other inaccuracies, identifying India as the Regional leader?
You are right, India is not the leader of the Middle East which is where Pakistan is.
India is however the leader of South Asia.
Even though India, is 5 times larger, Pakistan has and In sha Allah, will always look eye to eye with India. This is the reality, though it may be hard for secular, and liberal people, like the author, and others, who suffer from a defeatist attitude, to digest. The only power, and reality is Allah Subhana, the one and only god, who has no partner, and has no resemblance to any of his creation. It was the miracle of Allah Subhana, that Pakistan has become a nuclear power, and ready to thwart any aggression, This is realty, which again is hard for the disbelievers, and their secular liberal friends, to digest.
Pakistan is like a youngest and spoiled child in the house who can get most of his wishes by wailing/screaming/demanding but sometimes gets slapped too. That is where you get by thinking that you are not only the center of the world but of universe. However, I don't agree with the author on identity crisis. Actually, we are the sum of all of those and not any single one.
I have heard Ms Mazari several times in talk shows and I know she has been an anchor person on a PTV talk show some time ago. In my humble opinion, she totally fits the profile of present day talk show anchors. If you know what I mean!
We are half master in every field every single thing ...
I went to govt school in lower middle class areas in Karachi most of our teachers were Urdu speaker UP, Dehliete migrants and there language of lecture was Urdu and we Hindko speakers allways discriminated of accent we cant make it like them and many times I being called Hazarayee Bhet jao you cant read Urdu well and here we are now Arabic in Mosques Urdu national lang, English Official lang, Farsi or Persian iqbal & Ghalib lang, many regional languages and soon Chinese will be busniss lang that many lang and Mr Bangish want to know our identity how and why????
I have on multiple occasion on these comment pages of ET pointed out that Pakistan has an obsession for boxing above her weight class and nurturing an outsize military in order to seek military parity with India resulting in the inevitable consequence of stunted development entailing Pakistan figuratively “Eating Grass”.
I have also said that till such time as Pakistan accepts the immutable reality that she is inferior to India, education, health and other social sectors will remain stunted.
It is thus satisfying to see a Pakistani author like Mr. Bangash agreeing with much the same thing.
Anyway, the solution is rather straight forward, but the big question is will Pakistan make the rational choice and junk braggadocio?
I can understand and sympathise with the frustration in the article above, however I believe there is more of a fundamental issue here. Mazari, Fauzia Kasuri, Arif Alvi are not true representatives of the kind of change Imran had promised. The top most reason behind Imran's popularity pre May,2013 elections was his consistent and solo appearances on TV, where he had the maximum opportunity of presenting his visionary approach to the people of Pakistan. Flawless as it can be, unfortunately the same cannot be stated about the current PTI lot which appears on state and private channels. Unless there is a sudden and drastic shift in his strategy and Imran actually either carefully choses true, patriotic, charismatic (most important) representation, than PTI will go back to the days of being called a one man show. I regret it deeply because all was going so good and as a Pakhtun expat I was so hopeful to be picked and pulled back to Pakistan to support with my experience in the KPK reforms. None of which happened, and now we all see KPK MPA's and the afore mentioned leaving no stone unturned to defame PTI. As unintentional as it may sound, these guys are not doing PTI any favours! Save PTI and save Pakistan!
@Agnostic:
The authors article has several other inaccuracies, identifying India as the Regional leader?
Rex Minor
Isn't it odd that while suggesting realism by the Pakistanis, the author has unwittingly reduced India's size by asserting that it is four times bigger than Pakistan. Will he kindly explain how India has come down from six to four times of Pakistan?. Either it is a typing error or the author is talking of pre Bangladesh Pakistan. Will he care to clarify?
Eventually, only Punjab will be left to call itself Pakistan.
A great Op Ed by a scholar. Yet we would continue to deny the realities and live in fool's paradise. We are the greatest, special and superior yet in fact we are hungry sick, illiterate and tribal in all walks of life.
Afghanistan is in Indian subcontinent since India is the second largest donor / investor of it - $ 2 Billion. But Pakistan wants to be Central Asian and Mideastern.
@Author: She argued that, “We as Pakistanis must think that we are the centre of the world”
And I am sure for her the Sun rotates around the Earth and the Earth is the center of the Universe.
What her comments show is a lack of critical reasoning and an inability to introspect which unfortunately seems to be an epidemic in Pakistan with the author being one of the select few who are not afflicted by it.
@shahid: Then how is it that the Indians, the Chinese, the Iranians and even the Afghans have their own distinct identity?
Excellent article ... but sadly, probably out of the realm of understanding for the average Pakistani.
The author, despite his position as the chair of the history department at F.C. College, apparently has never carefully looked at Pakistan's map and its surroundings. Given where it is located and and the geographical and civilizational cross currents that this area has been part of historically, it cannot isolate itself into one of the capsules that he has specified. Our languages, our dress, our food, our literature, our religions, have been influenced by all of our surrounds and so we have to learn to live with it. It is a sad state of affairs that a history professor would make a statement like this In fact this is simply yet another part of the ongoing attempts to re-write the history of this area in order to meet some current and political needs. Unfortunately for the professor sahib, it is not going to work.
Its all downhill really.
With 'Think Tanks' like Dr Mazari, your enemies don't really need 'tanks' - these 'think tanks' will lead to the slow but sure demise of Pakistan!
The whole world is showing Pakistan a mirror, but Pakistan is blaming the mirror; not the iamge in it!