And yet, they all pale in comparison with the lot that Arvind Kejriwal and his Aam Aadmi Party have to contend with. While Mr Kejriwal has more than once been slapped in public, even briefly detained in Gujarat, his fellow party members have come under a number of attacks during their rallies. And as mystifying as it seems, the Indian election commission has not taken much notice of the blatant breach of protocol. Instead, the day he was slapped in a roadshow, which he had to later cancel, he was sent a notice for holding a meeting at Rajghat where he went after the incident ostensibly without permission. Apparently, those resorting to violence can get away with anything without permission, but not a democratic gathering. But more of that later.
I was arguing that fighting for democracy is an absolutely thankless and often, self-effacing job. Those who challenge democracy usually resort not only to verbal or physical abuse but even use matters of race, language, faith and caste to their advantage. The TTP’s attempts to declare democracy un-Islamic is only half of the story. If you want to hear the more secular version of this benighted interpretation, you only have to meet Musharraf’s supporters. Sadly, India’s case is no longer much different.
Recently, an Indian friend shared his concerns about what he called the ‘Afghanistanisation’ of Pakistan. While appreciating the merits of his argument, I told him not to worry too much about our situation because we were trying to fight such a negative influence to the best of our abilities. The biggest challenge for an Indian should be what I call the ‘Pakistanisation’ of India. The struggle between our democratic forces and the deep state are well known while the Indian democracy has steered clear of any dictatorial influences. But the account of the Indian establishment’s rising influence on foreign policy, produced in Sanjaya Baru’s book The Accidental Prime Minister, has given words to what we speculated throughout the United Progressive Alliance’s two terms. And yet, that is a big concern here because in our democratic circle, India is considered something of a role model.
Now back to the elections in India. It is a sad commentary on the quality of Indian elections that someone as divisive and with such huge image deficit as that of Narendra Modi can run for the office of prime minister. But Indian businesses, media and why, even its deep state, seem bending over backwards to identify him as the only plausible candidate. According to CMS Media Lab’s survey of media coverage given to all political parties during first 15 days of March, Modi was given 365 minutes in the prime time slots whereas Rahul Gandhi got only 72. Wait, it gets better. Kejriwal got more minutes than both — 429 minutes — but the treatment was markedly negative.
The decision to bar Azam Khan from contesting elections while Amit Shah is permitted must have come as a surprise to many. Both are polarising personalities and should have been kept away from the process. But the biggest shocker was the NDTV-Hansa Research’s opinion poll which showed the BJP-led NDA comfortably gaining 275 seats.
The question is: if there is no serious challenger, why is Mr Kejriwal’s party being so thoroughly harassed?
Published in The Express Tribune, April 19th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (22)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Strategic Asset: You say: Now coming to Modi, as a minority myself, I do not consider him divisive.
I do not think and nor can any sane Indian think that Modi is divisive. If at all he is unifying. The divisive forces want to keep India divided on the basis of religion or caste. Modi, by whatever he did or did not do, has brought a sense of unity by making everyone realize that they are Indians first and the religion they follow comes next. Also, coming from a lower caste and a humble beginning of a tea vendor, he has brought brought a sense that caste or coming from a poor background is no barrier. Ex. President Abdul Kalam, though a muslim, was an unifying and motivating force in India.
Those who cannot think beyond religion can never understand these.
AAP/Kejriwal claims victimhood and then blames everyone one else for his problems. No wonder Pakistan identifies with him
After following Indian election for so long, it is evident their democratic setup is very robust, and the concept of secularism harbored by them is worth appreciating, Long live Indian democracy!!!
@Author: My apologies if my comment appeared unduly harsh to you. I refrained from commenting on your previous article on elections in India because I otherwise like your objective analysis.
The fact is that elections in India cannot be surmised by an arm-chair pundit sitting in some remote corner of the world. As a nation of over 1.2 billion and as the largest democracy in the world, India has its complexities such as regional parties and spoilsports who could have a major role to play in the outcome of our elections.
Perhaps this time it is too late for you. But next election, I would encourage you to visit India to understand the situation yourself
@Bunny Singh:
You ask: "So whats the deal being brokered between army and the so called democratically elected govt about Musharraf?"
Not sure if it is about Musharraf or not. However, Nadeem Malik said in a recent TV talk show that he personally heard Haroon Rasheed telling someone that the recent meeting between Nawaz Sharif and Army Chief was "Idhar Hum; Udhar Thum".
Atleast someone like Arvind Kejriwal has managed to come up and become popular in Indian politics. Imagine that happening in Pakistan. So whats the deal being brokered between army and the so called democratically elected govt about Musharraf? By the way Hamid Mir has been shot today just incase you did not know.
Poorly researched and half baked info. Its better not to write rather than giving wrong info to your readers.
Laughable when a pakistani lectures on democrary.
Pakistanization of India is a good term and that is a scary scenario. UPA had almost reached there, ministers shamelessly defending corruption, PM not resigning even after serious allegation of corruption. It is far cry from the earlier generation where Lal Bahadur Shastri resigned because of a rail accident. Moreover it is really a shame that a person who never stood in a general election was PM for 10 years.
Other poits of your article only show the lack of information you have about elections in India. Amit Shah case is different from Azam Khan. Azam is adament and he is not willing to appologize so ban continues there is nothing unfair about it.
I have read the articles by the author earlier also and it is clear he neither understands the process of elections in India nor the psyche of Indians.
Kejriwal was detained in Gujarat on the orders of the Election Commission of India (ECI) and not the Gujarat government. He was detained because he was in contravention of the Model Code of Conduct that requires any and all campaigning to be reported to the ECI.
Again, Kejriwal held the meeting in Rajghat in violation of the Model Code of Conduct this time in Delhi.
Regarding the number of people slapping Kejriwal or throwing ink at AAP members, this has gone on too many times to even be lampooned on satirical websites. In the case of the particular slap you mention, he was slapped by an auto-driver who was upset with him for not doing anything for auto-drivers. These auto-drivers (who also charge usurious fares) had campaigned for him in the previous Delhi election and they were expecting their fair share of sops similar to free water and discounted electricity bills.
The slaps have gone on for so long that people are beginning to think that they may even be stage managed. In the case of the auto-driver, Kejriwal got further airtime when he later met the auto-driver at his residence, withdrew a case against him and even got the auto-driver's apology. This was the same auto-driver who was beaten black and blue by AAP supporters the previous day.
In none of these cases was anybody's life at risk. The ECI therefore does not consider these as consequential events unlike say what Azam Khan said. Please note also that Amit Shah has been let off with a stern warning only because he was repentant and careful after that speech unlike Azam Khan who continued and still continues making inflammatory speeches.
Now coming to Modi, as a minority myself, I do not consider him divisive. This divisive tag is based on his handling of the 2002 Godhra aftermath for which a bench of the Supreme Court has acquitted him. Too much water has flown through the Ganges since then. The other fact is that there have been no riots in the powder-keg called Gujarat in the last 12 years.
Deep state bending over backward for Modi? Can't believe I am hearing this that too from a Pakistani where the ISI has been caught red-handed for having a special fund to aid its candidates. Please be sure that there is no deep state in India that can influence Indian elections.
I can go on and on with the many fallacies of this article, but I am sure the moderators will not let it pass as they have a penchant for deleting long posts.
Pakistani Democracy is flawed because
a) There was never Civilian supremacy, nor there ever will be. b) Was named an Islamic Republic by its founders, a title which will always bring Religion to the centre of the Constitution. c) No Robust institutions which can withstand Dictatorial influences, like India's when Indra Gandhi imposed Emergency.
The Author, I am sure, knows all of the above. But, he goes on to say "Indian democracy has steered clear of any dictatorial influences."
Hello! Indra Gandhi and her emergency!
India will never ever go through another Emergency. Its basic structure of the Constitution cannot be changed. That means no man can ever get powerful enough.
I bet the Author acknowledges this in private, but is overcome by this new found zeal to equate Pakistan's non-existent Democracy and its struggles with Military, to India.
The Author doesn't even know India's Emergency period, such people should not write articles on India and its political future.
Modi will come to power through the ballot, he will lose it through the ballot.
I have great respect for the author for his analytical interpretations of issues. A rare trait in Pakistan these days. But sir, this time you have got it wrong. Looking forward to your deeper analyisis of the above issue in future. Thank you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOrpn3zIs5c&feature=share another expose of AAP by it's member.. No wonder Pakistanis like AAP...they've found a new 'Jaichand' in him !!
It's not a shock for me that AAP is aided by american Ford Foundations..Maoists, Terrorists etc visit there offices in Delhi regularly..Naveen Jindal (Congress Industralist MP) funds AAP etc..
Dear Author, Pls note :
AAP knows only 1 thing, to do DRAMA - Arvind Kejriwal wants to generate sympathy and hence the repeated SLAP Drama.
Arving K was NOT detained in Gujarat. In India once the Elections are announced the control of Police is with Election Commissioner. Arvind violated Election Rules and hence Police under Election Commissioner questioned him. Law will not spare anyone including Arvind for Violations.
AAP will get max 5 % Vote share & ZERO seats in this Election. Pls dont waste time on AAP.
Indinas have chosen Modiji based on his abilities. Our Supreme Court has given Clean Chit to him on Gujarat Riots and we believe both SC & Modiji.
I listed to Amit Shah's so called "revenge" speech. He used the word "revenge" initially in the first part of his talk which made what he said vulnerable to misinterpretation. The rest of his speech, however was a typical political speech meant to rally voters and not incite them. Taken in its entirety, it was not at all an incendiary speech by any means.
Pakistani-zation of India! No matter how hard you try, and no matter the problems of India, Pakistan holds no comparison to India. Pakistan is in a league of its own.
Modi may have an image deficit only in sections of India's muslim community and in Pakistan. I would say that he has no image deficit even in US, though he was denied visa earlier. The reason being that when US denied visa, it was trying to get support from Pakistan in its war on terror. Now that US has walked out from Afghanistan, you will see change in US attitude as there is no longer a need to please Pakistan. In fact, there may be a need for the opposite now. Modi will be the darling of USA soon, if he not so already. I will give you a parallel. When India tested its nuclear device, US was extremely angry and fuming. Within two years relationship between India and US reached unprecedented levels of friendliness and warmth. So, don't keep counting on the past events and think that it shall be the same in the future also. I would also add that Modi will win this time and he shall win with huge support from the muslim voters also and not just the non-muslim voters in India. Election results shall show this.
No one was barred from seeking election. Both Amit Ahah and Azam Khan were barred for holding rallies and making speeches. Now, Amit has owned the mistake, was given a warning not to repeat and allowed to campaign. But, Azam, the Magnificent, would not own up to his incendiary speeches ("In India, Muslims are slaves' and such other gems), in fact reminded the Election Commission that it was not above the Supreme Court. It is expected that he will approach the Apex Court for remedy.