A dictator’s indictment

It is commendable that the army — on the face of it — did not attempt to step in to try and stymie the process.


Editorial March 31, 2014
One can’t help but see the irony that the many of the superior court judges that the former president has now been accused of detaining (as part of his treason charge) in fact validated his military coup in 1999. DESIGN: FAIZAN DAWOOD

The indictment of former president Musharraf is historic for a number of reasons and can be read as a welcome triumph for democracy in a country that has struggled with military dictatorship for decades.

First and foremost, it is obvious that the biggest achievement here is holding a former army chief accountable for his transgressions against the Constitution of Pakistan for the first time. It is an oft-quoted maxim that no one is above the law — but unfortunately the maxim has hardly been upheld when it comes to Pakistan’s justice system and particularly so when it comes to high officers of the armed forces. Let there be no mistake: his indictment is a big achievement in itself. The next step is the trial, when he will be allowed to defend himself — as he should be.



Before March 31, there was no shortage of speculation that there was no way the army would let a former chief be charged and that there was a deal in the works to get Musharraf out before anything happens. His indictment should put to rest most of this rabble-rousing. That said, it is unfortunately not without reason that this sort of speculation was rife from the day the special court was formed. Not many should be blamed for thinking that he would get a safe exit given this country’s history of letting the high and mighty off the hook to live comfortably in exile. Two appreciations are in order here. One, of the three judges of the special court, who not only had to deal with all sorts of frustrating antics by some on Musharraf’s defence team, but also would have been hearing all sorts of theories about the futility of their actions and orders. Two, it is commendable that the army — on the face of it — did not attempt to step in to try and stymie the process, as it very well could have and as has been the case so often in the past. And therein lies the rub: just because it has historically been the case does not mean it should have been assumed, particularly by the media, that this entire exercise was futile. Trend, after all, is not destiny. That said, one can’t help but see the irony that the many of the superior court judges that the former president has now been accused of detaining (as part of his treason charge) in fact validated his military coup in 1999.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 1st, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (15)

M A Mujeeb | 10 years ago | Reply

@nadeem:

What covert deal? Yes, Musharraf has been indicted but the court has freed him. He can go any where he likes. The court also indicated that he will not be required to attend the court during the future hearing of the case. So it is a legal process which has come to play and not any covert deal. The ball is now in Nawaz Shareef's court who had clearly said in the past that the matter was in the court and that he will abide by the court's decision. Nawaz Shareef has no moral ground to keep Musharraf on ECL. Like some one said "ACCHON KO BURA SABIT KARNA DUNIYA KI PURANI AADAT HAI".

Ali Haq | 10 years ago | Reply

I am disappointed that a seasoned and other wise rational editor is behaving like an activist. That too, an activist without a cause. Mr. Editor, you should consider yourself privileged, that at this point in Pakistan's history, God has given you an opportunity to help formulate a nationalistic narrative in the masses through your editorials. Not to bring the already uninformed political discourse to an even lower level of discussion. President Musharraf did so much for democracy in this country, that no other ruler had done before him. Coming from the media, you should have been the first person to acknowledge that. Free media was a dream, which President Musharraf made possible for Pakistan. Have you really forgotten that? Dictator? Do you really live in Pakistan? Haven't you seen what kind of 'democratically elected' dictators have ruled on us? It is your duty to set aside your personal biases and analyze President Musharraf's rule. Compare it with all your favorite, 'democratically elected' rulers, and then write an honest editorial on this unfortunate episode in the history of this country. Through President Musharraf's unprecedented free media law's, you have suddenly found a place from which you can become an opinion maker. Use that position to reform the society, not to propagate personal biases.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ