The CII had recently ruled that laws on child marriage were un-Islamic.
Lawmakers from the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), led by MNA Marvi Memon, had introduced a bill in the National Assembly on March 25 suggesting harsher punishments for those who contract and solemnize such marriages through amendments in the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929.
This bill was sent two months ago to the Secretariat. Interestingly the timing of it coming from the Secretariat to the floor of the house is such that it came after the decision of the CII.
“That is not of my making. We have not suddenly introduced this bill as a reaction to the ruling of the CII,” Marvi Memon said while talking to The Express Tribune, on Wednesday.
She clarified saying “It [bill] is not as a reaction. This bill was moved to the Secretariat a couple of months back and the process takes it due course and time. Now it has come to that time and I am grateful the government decided to send it to the committee,” she added.
“This is not [pushing] a Western agenda,” she said. “We are a PML-N government and follow the constitution and all Islamic laws in letter and in spirit.”
“Yes, we feel strongly about protecting our children and we do it keeping the Quran and Sunnah in mind. At no point will we move away from the Quran and Sunnah,” she added.
She further said, “As a sitting member of the PML-N, I would never dream of bringing an un-Islamic law to Parliament because we also have to answer to God before we answer to anyone else.”
Responding to a question, Memon said that she is looking forward to giving the arguments during the parliamentary committee.
“What was followed yesterday was completely as per process: the mover moves a bill, the government gives its response, and then allows discussion and debate in the committee,” she added.
Strategy at parliamentary committee
Though the matter has not yet been fixed for deliberations in the standing committee, the movers have made their strategy and for that matter they will be assisted by religious scholars who will respond to the concerns of the CII.
“We will put forward the recommendations of Islamic scholars and data from Islamic countries before the parliamentary committee. This will ensure that the issue will be settled in line with the teachings of Islam,” said Memon.
Responding to a question about the CII chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Shirani’s statement that Parliament cannot legislate against Islam, she said “Maulana Shirani has rightly said that the Parliament cannot legislate on a bill which is against Islam, but the question is who will determine that?”
It will be determined by the committee and in case it determines that the bill is against the teachings of Islam, there will be no legislation.
There is no legislation at this juncture. The committee will merely discuss and there is no bar on holding discussion, she added.
"The deciding factor is the parliament and if it decides the bill is un-Islamic then it has the right to throw this bill out,” she added.
COMMENTS (30)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Bash UK: Dear Bash, Sometimes I think we are fighting a loosing battle. In the last 12 years the US has attacked or organized terrorist attack on several countries, over two million people are dead, many more injured, the countries attacked are now radio active and will be for the next 4.9 billion years, but some people just refuse to see the reality of the situation. However, keep up your good work. Getting back to the point of the article I do not think that young girls will be protected any time soon. The PM Nawaz Sharif appears to be shifting ground and giving in to the Mullahs. Unbelievable.
If Pakistan would be populated by decent people there would be no need for such a law. The problem is that you cannot live in the 21th century and at the same time in the stone age.
@Bash UK: You said Syria was attached by US. You can check it. If US has not attacked now according to you then how come they have blood in their hands? And where do you want me to run?
@vinsin:
Quite clearly you do not understand English, I have never once said us attacked Syria but they are the main instigators now run away and find exactly who is behind deaths of Syrian and in my view the USA has blood on its hands, ,end!
@the Skunk - rebuttal, Mods - pls publish
So it is best not to assume and appear a fool! But a classic tactic - ignore the issue and malign the messengers!
@Jahangir Chauhan: Why don't you answer his question? why such things encouraged in pakistan in the name of islam and then you blame him being narrow minded? @Reeba Yep you are right. But it is impossible to separate state and the religion in pakistan.
@3rdRockFromTheSun: When a person leaves his mother country and settles abroad for economics and religion, it is better not to dabble in politics. Obviously, you cannot write against the adopted country, for reasons best known. Bash has got it right whereas you and Raj are infinitely wrong. If Hindu girls of five or six are kidnapped and forcibly converted to Islam then remember nobody will take their word, they being minors. What happened to Muslims in Gujerat 2002 with the patronage of Modi? Who invaded Iraq in 1991 and 2003? Who invaded Viet Nam, Cambodia, Afghanistan, Guatemala, among others on flimsy pretexts? 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' is not lost on the world. it is the BIGGEST FRAUD pulled off by the USA. If the USA is not directly involved it is always the darkest shadow behind the scenes. There are radicals or extremists or fundamentalists or oh yawn, whatever you want to call them. The aim is one and that is to create terror and being blind sided in their unbreakable belief in what their cult leader says.......terror is spread. Have a nice day and salams.
@marvi
'Islamic Scholars' ? , it is a contradiction in terms.
There are scholarly muslims, but I have never come across islamic scholars.
speaking to stone age desert cavemen minds!!! joke of the century
@Bash- who attacked Syria with help from America? Do inform us!!
@Bash UK: There are no Americans fighting and so how they killed Syrian people. On which date US attacked Syria.
@Bash UK: I agree us is quite you know obsessed with war - but what does the us have to do with Syria ? As far as I know people are forcing us to go in and get bashar off and saying because there is no oil they r not doing it...uhm if I was us president I would not go anywhere near that country and as far as I know USA is supporting the REBELS. so your point is invalid. this war is nothing but Shia and Sunni fight now and against a tyrant dictator.DONE.
Well not the first Pakistani politician to cower in front of the religious uber-right.
Where is it written the Koran that men should marry underage girls? It is men's fancy to have younger wives and satisfy their sexual desires. Also why should the Islamic clergy be involved in playing a law? Aren't legislators competent enough to pass a law and convince the populace?
@Raj - USA: You are narrow minded always biased when it comes to Muslims, Islam, and Pakistan
you will be able to find some
@vinsin: Syria was attacked by and with the help of the US, Please try to stay informed..