Once the government wraps up and the cabinet jobs are handed back, the UPA will dissolve itself rather than remain as a coherent opposition. And most of the people who backed the Congress for being secular or progressive will now back the BJP for being focused on development.
In some ways, the UPA had ceased being 'progressive', the quaint term used to allude to leftism, after the exit of the Communists. They supported the Congress from the outside 10 years ago and were the first to leave the alliance. They said they were pushed out by Manmohan Singh's desire to befriend America through the nuclear deal.
Today, the UPA is only the Congress and its state partners in Maharashtra and Kerala, and little else. And in Maharashtra, it is not really an alliance so much as rival factions of the same party, with one side headed by Sharad Pawar. In Kerala also, the Congress allies with former factions of itself and the Muslim League.
Of all the other parties in the UPA, only the National Conference has three Members of Parliament (MP). The rest are single MP parties. The larger groups holding the government up are all on the outside, including the Samajwadi Party and the Bahujan Samaj Party.
Many, many more parties have left the UPA over time than remain with it. Bengal's Trinamul is long gone and so is Bihar's Rashtriya Janata Dal of Lalu Prasad Yadav. They left when the weakness of the government meant they could no longer squeeze it for profit in terms of either personal or political benefit. Such opportunism does not hurt the regional forces and they have become quite shameless in striking up alliances.
This is true especially of the southern parties, such as the DMK, the ADMK and other small caste groups from Tamil Nadu.
The Tamilian parties have become utterly mercenary and no longer make any pretenses of differentiating between the Congress and the BJP. The journalist, Shekhar Gupta, came up with the term ‘ATM ministries’ to define those portfolios, such as telecom, that the Tamilians demand because of their money-making potential.
This will remain true for the next formation as well. If the opinion polls are accurate and the Bharatiya Janata Party is on track to win no more than 200 seats, and in constant need of a few dozen votes, it will be in a similar position as the Congress. The cost to prop up the government will be the surrendering of large parts of it to the Tamilians, whether they are Jayalalitha's MPs or Karunanidhi's. It will also mean giving regional parties a veto on foreign policies that concern their state. The Bengalis made life miserable for Manmohan Singh over his Bangladesh policy and the Tamilians blocked his reaching out to Sri Lanka.
We can observe the temporary and essentially opportunistic nature of India's political alliances on the other side as well. The NDA was put together by the Janata Dal (JD) in Bihar, which exited the alliance last year after Narendra Modi's nomination as prime ministerial candidate. In a way, this exit by the JD signaled the end of the NDA because the only allies remaining with the BJP were those who supported it before the NDA was formed. These are the other communal (I use the word in its traditional rather than accusatory meaning) parties, the Sikhs of the Akali Dal and the Marathis of the Shiv Sena. All the others — and there were a dozen others in the time of Atal Bihari Vajpayee — have left. It was George Fernandes of the Janata Dal, who made the BJP acceptable by aligning with it. It is said that the BJP becomes secular at 180 seats and no doubt that is what will happen this time as well. Some opportunists, like Chandrababu Naidu from Andhra Pradesh and Dalit leader Ram Vilas Paswan in Bihar, have already returned to the nascent alliance, which may or may not be called the NDA after Modi's victory.
And after the victory comes, Modi will have the same unpleasant task on his hands that more than anything else occupied Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi for the last 10 years.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 23rd, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
If there is any comfort to be taken from this diagnosis, it is that there is likely to be a complicated situation post-election and whatever government forms will be a weak one. A weak NDA government will still be able to accelerate the task of packing the civil service, the education system, etc. with RSS people. Groups like the RSS, VHP, Bajrang Dal, Hindu Janjagruti Samiti etc. work constantly at communalising Indian society anyway - their task will be made that much easier following an NDA victory. It is worth noting, though that some of the foot-soldiers of Hindutva are not entirely happy with the division of labour - they have to do the hard work while others reap the glory. You can see this quite clearly in the way that Babu Bajrangi, Haresh Bhatt, Swami Aseemanand etc. are willing to talk to journalists. You can see it again in D. G. Vanzara's letter of resignation. These people have organised mobs, pogroms and fake encounters, and planted bombs, only to be left in obscurity or jail.
@Bala:
Tamilians never had any sense of nationalism. "Periyar" himself consulted Jinnah to secede Dravidanadu (comprising of Maharashtra, Andhra, Kerala, Karnataka and of course Tamil Nadu). Jinnah simply ignored them as they ought to be! I am highly appreciative how Sri Lankans crushed the Tamil terrorism.
@Bala: Regarding the Tamil issue, I am sorry to say that Indian Tamils are the ones who have defeated themselves. Talking about Tamil Nadu being independent will not endear yourself to others.
By the way, can you name one Tamil leader who has mass-support or commands respect outside Tamil Nadu? I am not talking about the north, other states in the south as well as west and east of India have leaders with a mind of their own and can provide support if they believed in it. Also I do not wish to be unduly harsh, but some of the goings-on in Tamil Nadu rank right up there in fringe-news articles with UP & Bihar. Bear in mind also the huge amounts that were involved in the 2G scam masterminded by DMK and executed by their Raja and Maran. When the leaders in Tamil Nadu only care about amassing huge sums of money for their own family, why would other Indians support their cause?
Nevertheless you have to acknowledge that 1) what India can do at this moment in Sri Lanka is very limited especially since Sri Lanka is playing a dangerous game of regional rivalry, 2) Sri Lanka is not exactly heeding India, and 3) there is no alternative leadership that has emerged from within the Sri Lankan Tamils. However I have no doubt that unless Sri Lanka quickly address its discriminatory practices that led to the freedom movement in the first place and assimilates the Tamils, the problem is likely to fester and re-emerge in the future.
@Jahangir Chauhan: Gujarat has had communal iolence since pre independence days which continued unde rCngress when there would be riots every couple of years. Under Modi Gujarat has been riot free for 12 years - the longest stretch since independence. All communal incidents under last 12 years have been in non NDA states.
Gujarat 2002 was neither the first riot nor the biggest one in India.
In light of these facts, please tell me what is the basis of your statement that NDA rle under Modi wold be disastrous?
@mahakaalchakra: Modi will be a desastur for India when he will comes in power he will bring communla violence in the country, and then people will repent on their choice of praising and electing him as PM candidate and 272 no seats though it seems highly unlikely to me.Recently PM of India clearly mentioned the threat India is facing with Modi and saffron terrorist who apparently are about to come in powrer corridors with having fascisit mindset and follower of suich Nazi ideology..
I think Indian Tamils feelings and opinions should count for something. When it comes to Sri Lanka or Indian Tamils, Indians must stand with fellow Indian Tamils. That is what democracy is all about. The same goes for Bengalis !
TN population is 72 million where as Sri Lanka is just 20 million .... who's voice must be respected more (from a geopolitics view)? GDP of TN is $150+ billion dollars where as Sri Lanka is 59 billion dollars.
Which region benefits India more?
If TN was independent TN would not be looking up to "north indians" for solidarity and Sri Lanka would not have gotten away by murdering 40,000 people in the last few weeks of war.
Being a vast country India has people with many different ideas. Therefore it is foolish to hope to have one party Also political parties have people with very big egos each of whom wants to be the Prime Minister. This gives rise to instability due to infighting. In the West each party has people with diametrically opposing views but party loyalties keeps them together so one party is able to rule the nation. Unfortunately in India our parliamentarians form a party if their goal is not met or their ideas are not accepted e.g. Sharad Pawar, Lalu Yadav Jayalaliths to name a few such prima donnas.
Modi is slowly and steadily working on his declared MISSION-272-PLUS. The last poll surveys five NDA around 229 and watch the next survey after all on-way traffic to BJP, would give NDA of Modi around 300 seats.
It is called TINA. There is no alternative to Modi.
These are the other communal (I use the word in its traditional rather than accusatory meaning) parties, the Sikhs of the Akali Dal and the Marathis of the Shiv Sena.
Strange that you planted the word "communal" in the context of the NDA, whereas there is no mention of IUML, AIMIM, etc.
Some opportunists, like Chandrababu Naidu from Andhra Pradesh and Dalit leader Ram Vilas Paswan in Bihar, have already returned to the nascent alliance
I wouldn't paint Naidu and Paswan with the same brush.
Paswan left NDA in 2002 because of Modi and now he is back in the NDA in 2014 because of Modi!