Russia's annexation of Crimea 'gravest' threat to Europe since Cold War: NATO

Rasmussen demanded Moscow halt all military activities against Ukraine, seek peaceful dialogue with Ukraine's govt.


Afp March 19, 2014
"Any attempt to justify the annexation of Crimea through a so-called referendum held at gunpoint is illegal and illegitimate," according NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen. PHOTO: AFP/FILE

WASHINGTON: NATO's secretary-general said Wednesday that Russia's intervention in Ukraine posed the most serious threat to Europe's security since the end of the Cold War and warned Moscow it would face international isolation.

"This is a wake-up call," alliance chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen said in prepared remarks. "For the Euro-Atlantic community. For NATO. And for all those committed to a Europe whole, free and at peace."

There had been crises in the Balkans in the 1990s and in Georgia in 2008, "but this is the gravest threat to European security and stability since the end of the Cold War," he said.

The situation was more serious because of the scale of Russia's action, representing one of the largest troop movements in Europe for "many decades," and because it was occurring "right on NATO's border," he said.

Rasmussen, who was holding talks in Washington on the crisis, denounced Russia's actions as "military aggression" that violated Ukraine's sovereignty.

"Any attempt to justify the annexation of Crimea through a so-called referendum held at gunpoint is illegal and illegitimate," according to the prepared remarks.

He demanded Moscow halt all military activities against Ukraine and seek a peaceful dialogue with Ukraine's government.

But "if it continues on its current course, Russia is choosing increased international isolation," said Rasmussen, in a reference to threatened economic sanctions against Moscow.

But Rasmussen issued no military threat and acknowledged the West had no "easy" options at hand.

"There are no quick and easy ways to stand up to global bullies.

"Because our democracies debate, deliberate, and consider the options before taking decisions. Because we value transparency and seek legitimacy for our choices.

"And because we see force as the last, not the first, resort."

COMMENTS (2)

G. Din | 7 years ago | Reply

Is British annexation of Falklands so different from Russia's annexation of Crimea? Falklands is poles apart from UK; Crimea had been a part of Russia up until 50 years or so ago and is contiguous to Russia until Khruschev, in a drunken stupor, presented it to Ukraine as a gift.

Rex Minor | 7 years ago | Reply

It is time for Rasmussen and the NATO to appease and refrain from making beliggerent statements. Russian Gene has woken up and is ready to retake his former satelliite countries if provoked. And no one in Europe is prepared to be turned into a radio active ash.

Rex Minor

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read