The Chinese ADIZ has upped the ante and is a test for the US. The disputed islands fall under the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security, which in the case of any untoward event, requires the US to defend Japan. Historically, the islands did not belong to any country till their occupation by Japan in 1895 in the wake of the Sino-Japanese war. Archival evidence, however, suggests that the Chinese had sovereignty over these islands prior to that war. China is of the view that the islands should have been returned to it after the Second World War. Instead, their control passed on to the US authorities based in Okinawa. In 1972, this control was transferred to Japan without resolving the issue of sovereignty.
The row can be seen to be the prism through which the two regional powers are looking into their past, which has not been a very pleasant one. They are also looking into future, which promises them a bigger and a far more strident role in the region. With China emerging as a major power, the US-led order in East Asia is under stress. China is going to overtake the US in the coming years in many respects. In Japan, questions are being raised about pacifist clauses in the country’s Constitution, which renounces the country’s sovereign right to arm itself, with only a self-defence force allowed to be maintained. Security needs are mainly met through the treaty arrangement with the US. The current nationalist Japanese government is wishing to adopt a more strident approach and the sparring with China should be seen in that context.
The fallout is spilling over to the proximate regions as well. The South China Sea is rife with territorial disputes. Very recently, the local government of the southern Hainan province in China imposed restrictions on foreign fishing vessels by making it mandatory for them to seek prior permission before entering waters claimed by China. This development has caused disquiet in other countries in the region, which have counterclaims on these waters and they are fearing this move to be a harbinger of another ADIZ in the South China Sea.
In another significant development, Japan is closing ranks with India, which has had border issues with China. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is the first Japanese leader to have been the chief guest at the Republic Day parade in Delhi on January 26. The event was laced with symbolic connotations. There was a high profile display of weaponry and military prowess before a leader of a country whose Constitution renounces the use of force. India has extended to Japan an invitation to join its naval exercises alongside the US in the Indian Ocean, while Japan has shown interest in ramping up the export of nuclear technology to India. This will signal a shift in Tokyo’s policy on a highly sensitive issue as so far, it had been reluctant to sell nuclear technology to India because of that country’s refusal to sign the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
These events allude to the fact that the focus in the years to come will shift from the West to East Asia in many ways. As regards the stand-off in the East China Sea, one only hopes that the parties succeed in evolving a workable agreement. The situation should be of keen interest for Pakistan as China has been our all-weather friend during times of adversity, while at the same time, we also need to remember that when we were under US sanctions, Japan had been our largest donor in terms of providing economic assistance.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 4th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
we also need to remember that when we were under US sanctions, Japan had been our largest donor in terms of providing economic assistance.
@Feroz: Didn't really want to comment on ET, but just thought I should inform you of some other aspects. Firstly Indo-China relationship is not all that bad considering that Chinese Premier Li Keqiang's first foreign visit after assuming office was to India. Burgeoning trade is also in favor of this relationship even though it is skewed towards the Chinese. Of course India has to be wary of China's expansionist tendencies in the South China Sea and the North Pacific considering that we too have a contentious border with them.
Regarding Japan which is what this post really was for, I wanted to make a couple of quick points. Shinzo Abe, long before he became Prime Minister of Japan, formulated the Asian Security Diamond involving Japan, India, Australia and US. Would suggest you to read that article and you will also see that the US is activating something similar in its Pivot to Asia. Secondly India and Japan since September 2013 have a Currency Swap Deal, a bilateral pact, wherein the Bank of Japan would step in and use up to $50 billion of its $ reserves to prop up the Indian Rupee and reduce INR volatility. As per experts, this initial $50 billion outlay is expected to rise dramatically in the near future.
After winning cold war, USA has China on its radar. No super power tolerates challenger to their power. They have enlisted Japans economic power, India's man power, American technology to ensure China is bogged down in Asia. As a super power, America has to constantly look out for enemies and ensure nobody emerges to challenge them. Since China is advertised as a challenger, it is no surprising other nations are ganging up against it.
The Japan / China rift is very favorable to India. Japan like the US is heavily invested in China, mostly in the manufacturing sector. With the rise in tensions between them Japan has needed to hedge its bets. First the Emperor visited India, followed by PM Abe being the chief guest at the Republic Day parade. Some deal is being worked out where by most of the additional Investments by Japan will be made in India. Japan has deep enough pockets to finance India's Foreign Account deficits with its FDI. India is well placed here by not hitching its cart to any single horse. Being a founder member and leader of the Non Aligned Movement does have a few advantages.
So if China is 'all weather' friend, can Japan be termed as 'bad weather' friend as it helped Pakistan during US sanctions. Extending that, is US a 'good weather' friend?