To rub salt into the wounds, the British archives have made public the documents and letters relating to that period to synchronise with the thirtieth anniversary of Operation Blue Star.
The reason why Prime Minister Indira Gandhi sanctioned the operation was the fear she entertained from the militants who used the Golden Temple as their shelter. The then British prime minister, Mrs Margaret Thatcher, offered military help to Mrs Gandhi to enable her to go ahead with her plan. I have reached this conclusion because of the daily telephone talks they held. Mrs Thatcher herself told me when I was India’s high commissioner in London that they would converse on the affairs relating to India and the UK. They could not be discussing the weather. Sikh militants would have figured in their talks.
However, I rule out the assistance by Special Air Services (SAS) in the operation. Had this been true, the media in the UK and India would have uncovered it in the last 30 years. The operation, as former Lt General K S Brar has claimed, was entirely carried out by the Indian forces.
In any case, the truth will be known when the inquiry ordered by British Prime Minister David Cameron is complete. He wants to go into the role of Mrs Thatcher’s government in the 1984 operation and ‘establish the facts’. Indeed, Mrs Gandhi, before sending the army into the Golden Temple, was frantically seeking opinions from different people on whether to undertake the operation. R K Dhawan, her aide, came to my residence to know my reaction if the troops entered the temple. He indicated specifically that Mrs Gandhi had sent him.
“Don’t you ever think of sending the army because the Golden Temple is the Sikhs’ Vatican,” I warned him. “If you ever did that, the Sikhs would never forget or forgive this sacrilegious act.”
Giani Zail Singh was the president in those days. I would often meet him. He and Mrs Gandhi had become poles apart. So much so that she did not send him any papers, much less the cabinet’s minutes of meetings. This was unconstitutional.
However, she assured him that she would not send the army into the Golden Temple. Constitutionally, the president was the chief of the military. Giani said many a time that he did not like the manner in which she was handling the Sikh problem. I was a member of the Punjab Group, which Inder Gujral, before he became the prime minister, had constituted to bridge differences between the centre and the Akali leadership. The government of India cheated on us. The then home minister, Narasimha Rao, invited us to discuss how to reach a settlement with the Akalis. Little did we realise then that it was a sham exercise because the government had already ordered a military operation.
This was one week before the army entered the Golden Temple. Lt General Brar, who led the operation, told me that he was instructed to undertake the operation two weeks before it actually took place. The operation did not last long, although the army had to use tanks to meet resistance from the militants. Mrs Gandhi had to be consulted since she had specifically instructed not to use tanks.
President Zail Singh was the unhappiest person. No doubt he made a broadcast for restraint and amity, but made it clear that Mrs Gandhi’s government had done an irreparable loss to the Sikh community and its sentiments. Whatever the government’s compulsions, the onslaught on the Golden Temple was not justified. The apology by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress President Sonia Gandhi has allayed the disturbed Sikh community only to a small extent.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 27th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
A very informative an enlightening article by an elder statesman. Hope the author will shed some light on Modi. Set to become the next premier of India. Barring a miracle.
People who make decision as a rule do not make decision on a whim. Number of factors go into making a decision (economical, political, national interest, communal interest, environment etc etc). Regardless of reasons behind the compulsion of Mrs Gandhi in making decision history will be kind to her. She broke the taboo that police can not enter a religious place. This psyche has long term consequences on various religious groups as they know now that a precedence has been set and police can enter the place of worship. In western countries police enters Mosque, Gurdawara, Temples etc with boots on and sometimes with dogs. All religious group have protested against them wearing boot. The answer Police gives them is that boots are part of uniform. If you do not want us to enter your place of worship than make sure you do not give us reasons to enter your place of worship. Onus is on you not on us. If we receive a call for help we will be there regardless.
The decision by the late Mrs Indira Gandhi for a military action on golden tempel was a biggest mistake that she have committed after emergency which created a vaccaum which may take centuries to fill.
The author should explain why the GOI ordered the operation if it was "not justified". He was part of the Punjab Group - what options did this body consider and recommend to the PM? Last, on a significant issue such as this, why did he not make his voice (conscience) public then when he was part of the Punjab Group and also, being visited by emissaries from the Indian PM. In addition, (later on as HC) the PM of UK was personally indulging him in her conversations with the GOI. So he wants us to believe.
My point here is that Mr. Nayyar has made it a hobby to show up after the fact. He wants to look good. For someone who claims to be in the know of so many, he sure used his access to the mighty and powerful to sell books and indulge in gossipy journalism. He could have voiced his concerns prior to these tragic events like the "concerned" citizen he wants us to believe he is.