The proposals, as reported, propose to form a high-powered executive committee with permanent memberships for the Board for Control of Cricket in India (BCCI), Cricket Australia (CA) and the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB). This committee would override all other committees, which presently have more equitable participation by other boards. Two tiers involving promotion and relegation would be introduced in Test cricket with exceptions made in the cases of India, Australia and England. The Future Tours Programme, which required all member teams to play other teams, would be replaced by bilateral agreements. Countries may only play teams they want to play and more importantly, for Pakistan, they would not be required to play teams they do not want to. A new financial model would be introduced for sharing revenues, which would increase the shares of the troika. The BCCI would, for example, increase its share from under five per cent to about 21 per cent. Correspondingly, shares for others would decrease.
The PCB is presently undergoing an upheaval in its administration. One wonders if these fundamentally far-reaching changes have registered with the powers-that-be. Pakistan has found itself in the cold through circumstance and gross mismanagement, but if this proposal goes through, things would be grossly worse.
It is ironic that cricket used to be considered the by-word for fairness and gentlemanly conduct. To say something was ‘just not cricket’ indicated that something was unfair. Yet, the politics of cricket is fundamentally power-based and revenue driven. For example, talk of a two-tiered relegation system for Test cricket is effectively rendered a hollow fig-leaf when one notices that the English, Indian and Australian teams would never be relegated. One queries how this could be termed a merit-based system.
The ECB and CA aside, this in a way seems an extension of India’s drive for global significance. In a similar vein, it has sought a permanent seat on the UN Security Council. All argument against that state of affairs applies equally to the present case. In fact, it seems that the inspiration of the ICC proposal was drawn from the lopsided Security Council, where the big powers retain veto powers. The ICC proposal would effectively form a security council for cricket, with all of the dysfunctions and asymmetrical power institutionalised, just as it is done at the UN body.
With our continual bad blood with our tetchy neighbour, Pakistan would be impacted more than most. One wonders what South Africa would presently be feeling, given that they presently top the cricketing tables but are being left out in the cold by this. In effect this is, as one commentator put it, “potential kidnapping” of cricket; a hostile takeover.
In this proposal, there is also an opportunity for Pakistan. So blatant is the proposal that all other boards are quite likely to react adversely to it. The PCB should capitalise on this. It should call for the proposers (mostly from the ECB, the BCCI and CA) to resign. Pakistan should not only counter the move but also play a leading role in its opposition and take it up as an opportunity to end its isolation, to develop ever closer links with the other boards, particularly South Africa, and use that as a counterweight against the dominant three. Sri Lanka, too, would be an effective ally. Surely, even Bangladesh for all its demonstrated animus recently would come on board. New Zealand cannot be too happy with the plan for Australian dominance. There is much that can be played on and used by a canny hand at the PCB. The PCB and its patron need to wake up to the insidious plan put into play and the opportunities it offers to them to end the isolation of Pakistan cricket.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 21st, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (11)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Ankur:
True.Imagine who would be even the least bothered if vietnam,malaysia and cambodia boycott FIFA ?
Similarly Pakistan is insignificant in cricket
Let India, England and Australia play each other. That would be great for the sport of cricket. A cricket world Cup without the "world" is awesome for any sport
Sad to read all this stuff over few days. being an Indian, i love the fact that BCCI has got financial muscle but would not enjoy if world cricket gets upset by any of its move. hope board officials will sit around the table with ICC and come up with somthing constructive and conclusive. what we least want is the under-nourishment of cricket playing nations like afganistan n zimbabwe, actually they are the ones who need the biggest support. hope everything will fall in place and ICC will come up with something that will please everybody. and eventually help us move this game forward that we love the most. - An Indian cricket fan
@Feroz:
"In money matters it is always advisable not to let Ego and Pride influence the outcome."
You got it totally wrong. Had this been only a matter of money, there wouldn't perhaps be much to debate and most would possibly have agreed to the big 3's right to reciprocal distribution of revenues (even that is not the right thing considering how the other international sports bodies like FIFA operate; they solely work for the development and advancement of the sport by helping the under-developed under-resourced sections, rather than distributing their revenue to already developed rich top teams). The real issue of contention here in ICC is that the big 3s are not only asking for the big chunk but also demanding a total control and monopoly over the game of cricket where everything happens according to their wishes and interests while relegating the other test playing members to a status equivalent to a second class citizen in which they would have little say in the matters, if any at all, related with game of cricket.
this two-tier cricketing system and the whole rationalization in its defense reminds me of the apartheid regime , "We are keeping separate for their own good (at the same time giving a particular group an elevated status)" the the helplessness shown by NZC anbd BCB officials points to the whole rot and the bullying on the basis of financial muscle by Big-3... But Cricket South Africa and PCB's rejection of the proposals have brought some hope.. hopefully the the history and heritage of the game would prove stronger than any bullying .. surely that cant take our dreams by their money , or can they?
Being an Indian I agree that BCCI is a big bully. It has even filed affidavits in Indian Courts that it is a private body having nothing to do with the Government of India, technically therefore it cannot call itself an Indian team. It should legally classify its teams as BCCI XI rather than Indian XI. In the material world we live in the financially strong flex their muscles, like the saying goes, he who pays the Piper calls the tune. This is happening in all fields everywhere and has nothing to do with sport. The PCB has to handle the issue very carefully, if it tries to rally other cricketing nations openly to oppose these moves, it could harm itself. It will be better off talking things out quietly with the ICC and BCCI and wangle the best outcome it can. In money matters it is always advisable not to let Ego and Pride influence the outcome.
Pakistan would remain in the pitts as long as we do not improve the internal security situation. Who can force a foreign team to come to Pakistan when our own troops are not safe in our capital city? If we want any cooperation from BD we have to apologize to them and stop interfering in their internal and judicial affairs.
The mean would do mean things, that is understandable, but what ECB and CA did really made me sad. I never expected that the Britishers would so shortsighted that they could be lured by greed of money and power to do harm to their own respectable game of Cricket. I agree with the writer's analysis that the proposed changes would be harmful for Pakistani cricket, as well as all the other rest (including this gang of 3, but only in the long run). However, I don't think that stopping its implementation would be that easy for Pakistan, as the world nowadays does not work on the principles of fairness. First, they didn't leave much time to organize any resistance. Secondly, they have privately assured SA, WI, and NZ cricket boards that they won't be effected if they support the proposed changes. SL and BD boards won't risk intimidating the powerful by not supporting them, and who cares about ZM. Moreover, SA is given the option to join the gang at later date, or join the rest. What I get is that the proposed changes in reality are the culmination of the process started in Lahore shoot-out at Sri Lankan team.
Any body interested in knowing in detail about the implications of the new proposals must read this analysis by Jarrod Kimber on ESPNCrickInfo.com.
I don't think any board will be foolish enough to oppose BCCI.
Few cricket boards trying to influence ICC just because they have got money? I could see it coming when BCCI got involved in ICC matters.. This is very unfortunate for the spirit of this gentlemen game !