This is amongst the most powerful scenes of Shakespeare. However, even this pales in comparison with what young Aitzaz Hasan’s father had to say about the martyrdom of his young son. He tells people not to express sympathy, instead congratulate him for his son’s glorious death, while also expressing the desire that his second son embrace a similar fate. The tragedy for Aitzaz Hasan’s father is more acute than Shakespeare’s Siward. Young Aitzaz had not signed up for battle; his possible death was not part of the bargain. Similarly, one can listen to Chaudhary Aslam’s widow come on television hours after her husband’s martyrdom and convey pride at his death, steady voiced, without a hint of fear. What are these people made of? We do not know what these people are made of. It has come to the point where it has stopped mattering. What we do know is that they do not belong here.
Aitzaz died in preventing a terrorist attack where the target was an assembly of hundreds of school children. Everything in us should be repulsed, not only by the attack and the mindset behind it, but also by those who either because of cowardice or due to sheer criminal stupidity make excuses for these murderers. And there are many, relying on made up histories, facile analogies, nauseous causal links with drones, imagined definitions of imperialism. They were never coherent, yet more recently, the apologists have even stopped offering any more conspiracy theories, even making the effort. They do not need to. Their brand of ignorance mixed with cravenness is winning, if it has not won already. However, the same people have the nerve to ‘condemn’ and ‘express sorrow’ at the martyrdom of the valiant child, Aitzaz. They are the same people, who cannot find it in themselves to condemn the murderers, i.e., the TTP by name, even after it takes gloating responsibility. The same people, whose ignorant rambling would suggest that the young child and possibly the hundreds more who were the intended targets would have been victims of ‘justifiable retaliation’.
These people who would lie, fabricate, foam at the mouth, do just about anything to avoid stating or facing what looks us plainly in the face. What are they ‘condemning’ then or ‘expressing sorrow’ about, the ‘unfortunate incident’? Till the time you cannot name the known murderers and condemn them, please do not bother, thank you very much. The families of Aitzaz and Chaudhary Aslam can do without your pseudo pity. They are not random victims of some global political conflict. They have been murdered by people who seek to bomb the schools of our kids, and do it due to ideological persuasions.
Mr Imran Khan and Chaudhary Nisar Ali Khan looked like they had lost a very dear loved one the day Mr Hakeemullah Mehsud was killed — one almost worried for their well-being in their moment of great loss. Yet, the death of young Aitzaz fails to evoke the same sense of loss or anger. Sirs, at least do us the courtesy of owning up the side that you clearly are on (which is the TTP’s side) and saying that you do not feel sorry at the death of the school kid, and that the kid died because of drone attacks alone. Revolting as it would be, it would be the honest rendition of your position.
Make no mistake; nobody comes out in glowing light. All political parties, which signed the All Parties Conference resolution of negotiation, should now make their positions clear. Let us not dishonour the memories of martyrs and our kids by condemning and lamenting every death, while maintaining the same position on the fundamental policy issue. The government has decided to posthumously recommend Aitzaz Hasan for the highest civilian award, and rightly so. However, awards in general, particularly, posthumously mean very little, in the absence of policy shifts. To remember Salmaan Taseer’s martyrdom without having the overdue conversation on blasphemy laws means very little. It is not possible to cherish Malala without policy reform in education in general and girls’ education in particular. The debt that the state and we as a people owe to Aitzaz means that we rethink or at least stipulate very clear preconditions and time frame for negotiations with his murderers, if that’s still the plan. Those who know Karachi better will be in a better position to comment on Chaudhary Aslam; however, his martyrdom requires that the structure and functioning of the police force be revisited. Cities and states do not run on super cops alone, they run on efficient law-enforcement agencies. Nobody should be required to be this brave.
Boiler plate condemnations have run their course. Get on with the talks if you must, or get on with enforcing the writ of state. In any case, display the spine to say when our children are murdered that this is ‘our war’, If you are unable to do that, keep the condolences and condemnations to yourself. We have more than enough martyrs already, both civilians and from the armed forces. We do not need more, particularly when we cannot decently honour their memories.
Shaheeds Aitzaz Hasan and Chaudhary Aslam you did not die in vain, however, weak words of condolence is all that we have for you right now. Like the words spoken to the old Siward, our cause of sorrow cannot be based on your worth, because then it will have no end, perhaps it should not. May you rest in peace and thank you.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 12th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (31)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@US CENTCOM: Dear Abdul, Reading your contributions is somewhat like a re-run of the British propaganda from WWI. All you have to do is change a few names/dates, and viola, there you have it. A complete campaign to convince the masses that you are the good guys rescuing the world from darkness and evil. Keep it up. We are all looking forward to the next episode. I am sure, at the very least, that numbers is enjoying them
@numbersnumbers: Dear numbers, We are getting away from the original topic and moving into the realms of minutiae However, as it is painfully obvious how very difficult it is for you to do effective research I am always happy to help you. It would be very difficult to go through all the decisions of Mr Churchill in WWII, but perhaps you could start by taking a look at the virtual obliteration of Dresden. Unfortunately, I have noticed in the past that both you and CENTCOM do not seem to have any problems with bombing campaigns, which kill innocent men, women and children, or at the very least you ignore them.
There should no doubt about the enemy’s intentions. They have been planning, strategizing and targeting military and police officers. They have attacked schools and school going children in the past. It was brave Aitizaz Hasan who foiled their evil intent of killing scores of school children. SSP Aslam was no friend of the terrorist, the fateful day of his death; he had killed three of them. It is unfortunate that there are still many apologists for the ruthless terrorists. We have to stand united against them. Before making excuses for them one should realize that we do no justice to the families of both brave men whose lives were cut short by the evil terrorists.
Abdul Quddus DET- United States Central Command
@Sexton Blake: Still haven't heard from you just HOW Winston Churchill was responsible for the deaths of 80 million souls during the Second World War as you maintain!
Wonderful writing Saroop Ijaz. Keep up the good work and someday they will listen....
@numbersnumbers: Dear numbers, Great to hear from you. I will not go to deeply into WWII history with you except to repeat the Mark Twain maxim: "Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you you please". You are obviously paying great heed to this maxim. ET does not normally print my replies to you. Perhaps the moderator will allow this one.
@Sexton Blake: Wow, nothing like ignoring history. WW 2 is generally acknowledged to have started on 1 September 1939, with Germany invading Poland, though various regional conflicts had actually started in 1937 such as the Japanese invasion of China and Mongolia! Winston Churchill became Prime Minister of England around 10 May 1940, succeeding Neville Chamberlin who saw how well "negotiations" with Hitler worked out! Now explain how suddenly 80 million have died because of Churchill some 3 years into the war?
Strongly written. What seems to be apparent is that the politicians, military and the State in general have abdicated their responsibilities ........ now its upto the common individual to do the work.
What do you expect from the persons running this banana state?
I guess that the ET mod has no special interest to allow comments which do not support authors narrative. This way one can observe the support of the Indian commenters as well and their cultural divide with Talibans is obvious. The author is a divisive person non grata for Pakistan and reflects the influence of frequent military rules..
Rex Minorr
@numbersnumbers: Dear Numbers, If Winston Churchill had not been around during WWII perhaps 80 million people would not have died. Negotiation is always the best option. The US has been fighting on the Sub-Continent for 13 years, and creating complete mayhem for Afghanistan/Pakistan. Now, without solving a thing the Americans are going home, and leaving Afghanistan/Pakistan to pick up the pieces.
Saroop Sahab, respects! Respects for being so laud and so clear, you gave sound to my sentiments and also you represent millions of Pakistanis who condemn not just the terrroris but also all ImmiKhans and ChaudhryNisarKans of the land who shamelessly wail and mourn death of our enemies and sympathise with terrrorist and remain silent when our own are victims of these terrrorists.
Time to revisit the agenda of all parties conference. You change your stance with changing situation and in this case the situation has never been different. No nation can stand on one view only, you need to adapt yourself because stagnant water can only produce staleness and smell. In the present scenario, the stench has reached sky high.
For clues to the politicians state of apathy, look between the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf.
The exact truth ........... you think so clearly and say it so well ............ bless you!
I think it is the time to take a decisive step. But we are in a dilemma and we lack "decision making power" as a nation. We have finest army in the world ,which has proved its worth in the past and which is willing to repeat that heroism again. We are heading towards an other "Opertion Rahe Nijat".
So so true. And such an eloquent and heartfelt piece of writing. Thank you Saroop too for speaking out and saying what needs to be said. How I wish the so-called leaders like Imran Khan did not act so cowardly.
Another great article by Izaz. The anger, frustration and helplessness of Pakistanis can not be expressed better!
Brilliant!. Easily the best piece I read on the subject.Its time to wage war on cowardice.
January 2011- A bunch of cowards in black coats garland a killer.
January 2014- A teenager in uniform confronts a killer.
May you find eternal life, Young martyr of Pakistan.
Sadly Pakistan has a bumper crop of "Neville Chamberlin" types who unflinchingly ignore the obvious while pursuing "Peace at any price" , conveniently neglecting to actually divulge to the public the price those forces of darkness are demanding! Those few "Winston Churchill" types in Pakistan cannot survive without the public support that is lacking because it has become so fashionable to indulge in the "Foreign Hand" conspiracy crap!
Beautifully written ! Not being able to openly name the killers is the worst perfidy indulged in. Leaving a worse situation hoping the next democratic government will come and do the cleaning up is a solution which may be too costly for Pakistan. Realization must dawn that what has not worked in the past will not work in future, a new paradigm must evolve. As long as the TTP and their million affiliates are not clearly told "come for talks in 3 months or face destruction", the country will have to keep taking losses endlessly. The State has to set its agenda as well as dictate the direction of the dialogue. The objective has to be very simple and clear -- disarming of all extremist groups, whether allied with the State or against it. Dual policies like sheltering the Afghan Taliban and targeting the TTP has not worked and unlikely to in future.
The author's article is riveting. And how true. However this will be forgotten. As Gen. Niazi. was. So long as there these unholy craven alliances. There is no light at the end of the tunnel.
Good piece. I agree.. start talking or start fighting...no more APCs and statements.
Thank you Saroop Ijaz for this thought provoking article.
Great article as always. Pseudo-liberals of PTI and self appointed guardians of Jamati Islam have no leg to stand on. Their argument has failed miserably and it's apparent even to people of KPK who were hoodwinked by these political hustlers.
Beautifully said! RIP Aitezaz, Aslam Khan.
There is something seriously wrong with this society that elevates villains to the status of "stakeholders" and literally brushes their heroes aside. God bless our fallen and every time these cowards attack our people another hero rises, that is our hope, not these coward politicians or evil partners in crime.