On failure!

Published: December 24, 2013
Email
The writer served as deputy chairman of the Planning Commission from 2010 to 2013

The writer served as deputy chairman of the Planning Commission from 2010 to 2013

M Bilal Lakhani recently wrote a poignant and painful piece on these pages (“We have failed our forefathers” on December 19). His questioning has been visited by abuse and derision. He has been accused of being unpatriotic, pessimistic and even worse, ‘un-Pakistani’. I share the pain of the youth that is crying out for answers.

Pakistani youth, like youth everywhere, want to achieve, compete and prove themselves worthy of being global citizens. Unfortunately, they find that channels, forums and institutions to foster their ambitions are missing.

Bilal is correct: raising questions or asking for a debate is not condemning Pakistan. The strength of advanced societies lies in their ability to foster debate on uncomfortable issues. The long and emotional debate on civil rights did much to mend the race problem in the US. Critics from within, like Noam Chomsky, Bertrand Russell and Jean-Paul Sartre have evolved society and given it a direction. Such thinking should be fostered and debated.

Pakistan reacts emotionally to the word ‘failure’. So let us stay away from it. But no one can say that we have no problems related to terrorism, poor governance, corruption, crony capitalism, violence, sectarianism, poverty and many other social and economic challenges. Anyone growing up in this environment is likely to feel sad and lose hope.

What do we offer to our youth? Ill-conceived packages where they have to show guarantors and invest money in a highly risky environment, with a high cost of doing business. Surely, that is window dressing. What does the youth need? The Greeks had it figured out. Why can’t we? Our youth is full of vitality. They need to compete. They need challenges. They do not want handouts. The youth is offered challenges in not just sports, but in academics, entrepreneurship, trading etc. Examples of Bill Gates and Steve Jobs are well known. These young adventurers gave us so much. How did that happen? It was a combination of first-rate universities, generously endowed by both state and business, an open society which cherished eccentricity, a vibrant, agile market and dense, diverse cities.

Gone are the days of rigid, hierarchical societies where age and rank were respected. In all countries, the average age of leaders in all fields is dropping. Barack Obama became president when he was 47. The key word here is ‘merit’. Whether you compete in a tournament or in the marketplace or even in a corporation — age and family do not matter. Ability and merit is all that counts.

What frustrates youth here is the lack of opportunities, merit and competition. The government dominates market and society, stifling merit and competition. It is organised for power and privilege and not for merit and service delivery. It is hierarchical, and lacks achievement and direction. All it can do is offer youth these ill-conceived incentive schemes. The poor quality of governance has also created a rent-seeking private sector that is opposed to merit and competition. Here, monopolies hide behind government-enforced cartels and entrepreneurship is made well-nigh impossible.

We need a large and long reform effort to restructure and reform government, the private sector and society. The Framework for Economic Growth at the Planning Commission developed the beginnings of such a reform effort in 2011. It envisaged reforms for quality governance, vibrant markets, creative cities and youthful communities. We should start taking such reforms seriously so that merit and competition can be brought into the system.

Reform efforts in most countries follow ideas that thought leaders have developed and debated upon. Most societies have forums, such as think tanks, research universities and professional associations that facilitate discussion and debate on the future. These are generously funded by the government and the private sector. Unfortunately, our leadership, the government and the private sector would rather spend all their time winning the GSP Plus status rather than engaging in domestic reforms. Their priority is to preserve the current stifling system. Perhaps, Bilal, you can help galvanise a debate on reform. It is long overdue!

Published in The Express Tribune, December 24th, 2013.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (6)

  • Imran
    Dec 24, 2013 - 1:20AM

    I wish politicians could appoint DC PCs who knew Pakistan beyond Margla Hills and Kashmir Highways and a bit how its run. Academics only, with their immature ways of conducting business, will continue advising irrelevant solutions based on this/that study.

    Recommend

  • Nadir
    Dec 24, 2013 - 2:47AM

    Our “leaders” in every sphere of society believe that what our youth requires are uniforms, the ability to march in a line, and discipline and thats it. We treat 20 somethings like children and then bemoan that our youth has lost its way.

    Recommend

  • Anon
    Dec 24, 2013 - 1:52PM

    Everything else is ok, but what is this new obsession with becoming “global citizens”… I think people need to first worry about becoming productive Pakistani citizens before they start moving towards the globe….

    Recommend

  • Hunter Punter
    Dec 24, 2013 - 4:59PM

    Youth cannot become globally competitive, if they study jihad in madrassas and still believe in attaining virgins on being killed for religion. Pakistan is almost living on another planet. Obsession with India, and extreme servility to the Saudis and middle east have contributed to this standing on a praecipe of disaster

    Recommend

  • Mansoor
    Dec 24, 2013 - 6:32PM

    As always, there is no match for your eloquence. But honestly, do you ever appreciate anything?

    Recommend

  • Ali Tanoli
    Dec 24, 2013 - 6:59PM

    Sir, its silly what i am going to say but its a truth we created by English speaking quaid and its westren educated mates but truth is why we are not able to creats a one society and one language education for example we speak Hindko inside the home when we go outside we needs Urdu, for official used we gotta learn Englesh, our national anthem is in persian, my friends speaks pushto, punjabi, balochis which i dont understand it, for relegen
    we need Arabic and worst of all for scholerships we gotta learn french, german, turkish, swedish tell me sir where would go and what would we do oooofff/…

    Recommend

More in Opinion