The recent nuclear deal with Iran has provided comfort to millions across the globe. Does this mean that covert wars, regional battles and instability might reduce? The situation vis-a-vis Iran was preceded by Obama’s literally last-minute decision to overturn his own decision to use military force against the Syrian regime. Perhaps, we are seeing the elephant finally turning around, away from disaster. Perhaps, others within the impact range of this elephant, too, will be able to keep away from the shadows of disaster.
Such is the sense of vulnerability and the expectation of success, that people worldwide sit with bated breath, hoping that good will come and bad will be avoided. A decade into the US invasion, Iraq still remains steeped in bloodbath. After Syria and Iran, there are indications of a serious rethink on the Middle East within the US administration.
Recent US media commentaries warning of Syria becoming a strong al Qaeda base may well be signals of a coming somersault in the US’s Syria policy. An interesting New York Times article “Jihadist Groups Gain in Turmoil Across Middle East” by Robert F Worth and Eric Schmitt quotes Ryan Crocker, former ambassador to Pakistan and Afghanistan, one of the many US diplomats who have now experienced the limits of force. Earlier, there was a time when the US, in its hubris, believed that lethal force can overcome all else. Crocker now advises that “we need to start talking to the Assad regime again”. Belated wisdom. And seems to come at a very costly price too.
Across much of the region, US intelligence operatives were cleared by the White House and the US State Department to cultivate covert assets as foreign policy tools. In Washington’s calculations, these ‘tools’ would in some ways weaken Arab regimes the US and its core ally, Israel, were not comfortable with. They would also weaken pro-Iranian elements in the region or would help strengthen ‘moderate’ forces. This was an odd pairing of objectives. The math wouldn’t add up. Hence, inherently contradictory.
Even worse, Washington ventured into this insurgent build-up plan in the region after a similar ’80s and ’90s undertaking in Afghanistan had boomeranged. From the so-called Afghan victory against the Soviets had emerged, the haunting phenomenon of al Qaeda.
Of course, many have disagreed with the inevitability aspect. They have argued that the early departure of the Americans left the space open for the Afghan and non-Afghan fighters to take on their own colours. I disagree. Once religion was invoked with the faithful, who travelled across countries and continents to battle ‘evil’, then ordering their retreat was never on the cards. Especially after one conclusive victory, the heady and victorious are ready for greater causes.
Interestingly, while studying in the US in the ’80s, I saw numerous reports produced by training institutions of the US Army, which raised questions about the nature of unintended consequences that the US may be confronted with from the CIA’s covert war in Afghanistan. Military literature raised fears that US engagement in the war could even become open-ended.
The fact is that the US repeated the blunder of the ’80s post-2000. The blowback of the ’80s policy began with the US embassy bombings in Africa in August 1998.
Most strikingly, Washington opted to hardly learn any lessons from the terrible outcome of its decade-long ’80s covert war in Afghanistan. By the late ’90s, the insurgents had morphed into groups with independent agendas. It never mattered who had funded them in the past. But maybe, now, Washington has finally learnt some lessons. Good for us in the region.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 17th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (14)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@ Bakhtiyar Ghazi Khan
You would have to erase the collective consciousness of 30 million Afghans in order for Afghanistan and Pakistan to become allies.
The Afghan Pashtuns don't think like the Pakistani Pashtuns and we have nothing in common as far as regional geopolitics are concerned.
Afghanistan will be the 2nd Vietnam of the US. It is bleeding and has no choice but to leave. Pakistan only needs to maintain its current neutral position and it will come out the strongest in the region, especially with the inevitable coming of a Pukhtoon government in Afghanistan. I am hopeful for a Pakistan-Afghanistan alliance in the near future.
@shah: shah g was something wrong with english writing-the only job of USA is to use us by giving different high pronounced words in lieu of a friend like,ally,non NATO ally,friend of democratic Pakistan,on same page and side by side continue with arm twisting,black mailing through WB,IMF,ADB,GCC,delays in our own money.Friends don't do this for him we lost all our neighbors and destroyed ourself and could become a nation.Every rascal is crazy to go to USA.
@Yusuf Its not job of US to build Pakistan.
Dear madam please tell what has Pakistan learnt from this war. going strong with exporting terror as state policy and busy finding who is a good terrorist and who is a bad terrorist. jumping into internal matters of all the countries of the world on the name of being the leader of an imaginary UMMAH and denial of all truth that the world perceives as truth. Running with the hare and hunting with hounds.Even Iran is building a concrete wall on its boundry with Pakistan to save itself.
@Yusuf: You do know that you are advising a superpower, one who has been hung out to dry numerous times in the past 12 years and even earlier, case in point being OBL in Abottabad. So you want the US to give a lot of money to set up schools and provide knowledge in gas & oil exploration with all money being from its own pocket, but all benefits and profits to go to Pakistan? Plus you want the US to join Pakistan's to join the Pakistan agenda for peace and harmony, like you have been doing in India for the past 65 years?
I wonder if delusion is a national epidemic in Pakistan.
Embrace Pakistan. Provide knowlege in seeking natural gas and oil exploration, establishing real primary schooling, stop dishing out money without direction. Join the Pakistan agenda in establishing peace as well as harmony and coordinate with Pakistan. We have been at war for too long lets try moderation with modernization. Stablizing Pakistan economy will give courage to forge ahead peace with neighbors, lets move.
@Rex Minor: Too bad you didn't look up "Guantanamo Bay" on Wikipedia to see the terms of the lease and payments involved for the property, starting with the perpetual lease of 23 February 1903, then modified by the 1934 Avery Porko Treaty.
So Pakistan did not want to stop Soviet Union taking it over after Afghanistan.Just forget that it had its own interests ,and then holding on to assets to wreak havoc on the neighbors and overseas.
While we can agree that American policies have been opportunistic and tailored to suit the occasion, you failed to enumerate the reason for the strategic analysts in Pakistan giving such poor advice to its government. Rather than developing a new alternative vision for the country analysts like yourself never analyzed or questioned regressive thinking and actions that brought only grief. Pakistan's policies and strategy have been a lot worse than those followed by America, something any poor and weak country simply cannot afford. The World has changed dramatically but many are refusing to adapt or change, finding solace in laying the blame on others and refusing to accept responsibility for ones actions. This cannot continue.
Miss zahra is a daring person and has written a refreshing piece. The difference between the achievements and the blunders of the country are reflected in the kind of the American administration it had at the time and whether it was able to shape the necessary reforms with support of the congress for their implementation. All its foreign adventures and fiascos were usualy accompanied by the lack of support from the congress.
What we observe today is that the country known for its amendments and opportunities is gradualy loosing the enthusiastic support of its friends and allies. China is the rising power from the East both in terms of its economy and its military which is racing to conquer not only this planet but others in the far distance as well. Mr Obama could return its Guatanimo Naval base which it leased from Cuba and is keeping it without paying any rental or compensation.
Rex Minor
Useless filler article.
As an opinion piece that was excellent. I feel that what is happening is that America being extremely intelligent, is simply adjusting its strategy but the overall direction and objectives will remain..........after all it is fortress and still the only superpower.
So... there should no doubts what so ever that, the apparent American blunders are in fact deliberate and premeditated ... the American war-industrial economy benefits from wars, destabilization of countries and regions ... that is the covert agenda ... there is always the overt exercise of analysis, seminars, discussions and media stories of what went wrong ...