Still awaiting the promised land

Few exceptions aside, the majority of people in the former colonies are still losers in the global political economy.


Editorial December 06, 2013
It is hard to escape the feeling that Mandela’s beloved South Africa is better off now in comparison to the apartheid era only insofar as its black majority exercises formal political rule. PHOTO:AFP

The response to Nelson Mandela’s passing late December 5 has been unparalleled. As the leader of the last successful anti-colonial movement of the 20th century, Mandela’s global standing was arguably unmatched. His story — featuring incarceration for almost three decades at the hands of a venal, racist regime that attempted to defy the march of history — is a truly heroic one, unlikely to be bettered by those who will emerge as global icons in the present century.



It is, therefore, extremely apt that freedom-loving peoples around the world come together to honour Mandela’s legacy. Yet, even while the tributes pour in, it is hard to escape the feeling that Mandela’s beloved South Africa is better off now in comparison to the apartheid era only insofar as its black majority exercises formal political rule. South Africa remains one of the most unequal countries in the world and, perhaps most tellingly, economic and cultural power continues to reside in the hands of white South Africans.

South Africa’s story is not an exceptional one. The European colonial empires in Asia and Africa that started to crumble with the departure of the British from the Indian subcontinent in 1947 may now be a relic of history, but ‘neo-colonialism’ continues to ravage large parts of the world. A handful of exceptions aside, the majority of people in the former colonies are still losers in the global political economy. The structural violence against the poor and dispossessed is double-fold; on the one hand they are exploited by the forces of world capitalism while on the other, class, patriarchial and ethnic domination within society is still deeply entrenched.

It is a little known fact that Mandela’s African National Congress (ANC) was committed to the socialist transformation of South Africa, at least until it came to power in the middle of the 1990s. Indeed, the end of the Cold War compelled many erstwhile revolutionaries to dramatically change their political postures. In bidding farewell to the man South Africans affectionately called ‘Madiba’, we should sombrely ask whether or not the genuine freedoms for which he struggled his whole life remain a pipe dream for ordinary South Africans, and the millions more like them all over the post-colonial world.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 7th, 2013.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (2)

Mirza | 10 years ago | Reply Nelson Mandela is a real leader and true father of his country rather the whole continent. He is one of the few leaders who did not pursue even those who kept him in prison for better part of three decades. There were no political prisoners after he came to power. Revenge was the last human feelings in his great mind. Among all the leaders who have won freedom and elected head he was the only one who was not power hungry and gave up the position only after one term. Today all dozens of his daughters, sons, granddaughters and their kids have Mandela as their proud last name. The man may have died but the name, dreams and ideals live on. What a Titanic figure NM was!
Toticalling | 10 years ago | Reply

The guy was a great man. If anything he was visionary and never claimed to be an economist. I visited Robben Island off the coast of Cape Town and saw the small room where he was imprisoned. There was a small bin which he had to use as toilet. Hid greatest asset was that he forgave those who tortured him, for the sake of keeping South Africa a rain bow nation. This bit about promised land still away is only partly true. Let us start with the improvements since 2002. Then almost 30% of households reported that they had experienced hunger in the past year; the proportion has dropped sharply, to 13% in 2012. In 2002 one household in eight had either no toilet or used a bucket-toilet; now all but 5% have a flushing one. The share of homes with mains electricity has risen from 77% to 85%. Almost two-thirds of homes now have their rubbish collected regularly. Around four-fifths have a television, an electric stove and access to a mobile phone. More than half live in their own home and only 14% in a state-subsidized dwelling. The journey may be slow in some areas, if at least the country is moving in the right direction. It has functioning democracy, laws are liberal, even allowing homosexuality. There are small hick ups, but the rain bow nation is still working fine, with whites Indians and coloured prospering along with majority blacks. . .

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ