The stakes could not be higher.
The last time Sharif chose an army chief, he was toppled by the same general, Pervez Musharraf, a year later.
Musharraf held power for nearly a decade from 1999 until the restoration of civilian rule.
The United States, which views Pakistani cooperation as vital to its strategy in neighbouring Afghanistan, will be watching closely, hoping for continuity before most foreign troops pull out of Afghanistan next year.
"What is best for the country may not be the best political option," said Mahmud Durrani, a former general who served as Pakistan's national security adviser until 2008.
"Nawaz will try to appoint someone who will do his bidding, not someone who is good for the army. And similarly, the new chief will be driven by the institution and not necessarily by any civilian leader."
The post of army chief is one of the most powerful in Pakistan and anxiety rests on who will replace the taciturn, chain-smoking General Ashfaq Kayani, who steps down on Friday after six years at the helm.
Three senior generals, Lieutenant-General Haroon Aslam, Lieutenant-General Tariq Khan and Lieutenant-General Rashad Mahmood, are seen as main contenders.
Mahmood is the third most senior commander and, army insiders say, a Kayani favourite.
Khan commands a Pakistani army corps and is considered an important interlocutor with the United States. Aslam is the most senior military officer after Kayani, and thus his natural heir.
Kayani has won credit for reducing the military's public role in politics although the army retains huge influence behind the scenes, especially over security and foreign policy. Like every civilian leader, Sharif will be keen to limit that sway under a new commander.
"Nawaz may trust in Kayani's democratic credentials, but he knows that is no guarantee that the next guy will also stay in the barracks," said a senior official in Sharif's administration who declined to be named.
"He also knows full well that most senior army officers are not supporters of Kayani's softer approach. This is an uneasy moment for Nawaz."
The army has ruled Pakistan for more than half its 66-year history.
Changing Attitude
One of Sharif's pledges in the run-up to his May election victory was to improve ties with old rival India.
Clashes between the two armies in the disputed Kashmir region just weeks after the vote put paid to that, for the time being at least, and Sharif will need to gain the support of Kayani's successor to make any progress on that front.
At home, the army has been wary of another Sharif campaign promise to open talks with Pakistani Taliban militants, battling the state since 2007 to impose their vision of a Shariah rule.
On the broader, decades-old issue of Pakistan's army using militant groups to further objectives in Afghanistan and in confronting India, Western officials believe that under Kayani the army's attitudes have been changing, largely because of the rise of the Pakistani Taliban.
Western officials believe that Kayani has been instrumental in pushing for negotiated settlements with insurgents on both sides of the Afghan-Pakistani border. They'll be hoping that trend continues under his successor.
"Sharif can't afford to pick a wild card right now," a retired Pakistani general told Reuters.
"He knows full well that this is not a time for adventurism or any wild experiments."
COMMENTS (33)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
At least no politician broke the country, waged wars in the name of egos and yes all of these generals would eventually have to resort to the politicians for legitimization of their rule.
@Xnain:
To be honest ..they were more responsbile and did more for Pakistan than any other political leader...
Unfair Child does unfair actions, Same way a General appointed out of turn will prove to be an unfair child. He may play havoc with country or Government.
no. it is not true. @Truth:
@sattar rind: they created taliban, that's been their game to earn dollars
@Truth: only logical because they serve USA
Gen Tariq has no chance. Period
Come on Mr.Sher it's crunch time. Let the cat come out of the bag.
Mr Nawaz Sharif will appoint General Haroon Aslam as the next chief of staff of the Pakistan army and will not play the game of poker as the last time. He is not to select but to follow the order of seniority rule!!!
Rex Minor
@US CENTCOM: you have emphasized great interest in making sure pakistan is destroyed fighting your wars
Pick any one. They are all equally bad, trained by the same retrogressive institution with the same elitist mindset. You can't make a bigger mistake, no matter whom you choose.
All Nawaz has to do is keep corruption in check, throw the openly corrupt in jail and provide good governance......... and it would be immaterial as to who the army chief was.
Xnain Realistically speking, Mush and Ayub were responsible and contributed a lot for the development of country . However Zia was undoubtedly the worst raskal.
@Xnain:
afghan war culture was a collective responsibility and the blame lies on all stakeholders, including the army. however, there was no sovereignty sold out on a phone call. i am assuming that you are educated and can read, in which case you should read comments by lt general hamid javed in the post 9/11 scenario. he was CS during musharrafs time and has spoken plainly about what occurred. needless to say, the political propaganda of 1 phone call is far from the truth.
@A J Khan:
Get your head checked out son before you are straitjacketed and placed in a mental asylum. Just my two cents!
The above picture explains it all. Just imagine the jeep as Pakistan, general is driver and our PM.... I think every one here can understand.
My money on Gen. Rashad and Gen. Raheel Sharif.
@A J Khan: "COAS is the most responsible son of the state" Oh yes, Yahya,Ayub,Zia and Musharraf were the most responsible sons of the soil. Gimme a break!
@Jibran: And I suppose Pakistan was broken by a politician. Afghan War culture introduced by a politician and yes Pakistan's sovereignty sold over just a phone call, a politician? You need to get your facts correct.....
We look forward to the appointment of the new COAS (Chief of Army Staff). We want to build on our improving relationship by working closely with the new leadership. The seriousness of the situation in regards to the ongoing violence in the region requires us to remain unified against our common enemies. It is simply imperative for us to maintain a healthy working relationship for the betterment of the region. We’ve always emphasized Pakistan’s importance in the region, and we certainly hope to continue our partnership in regards to our peace objectives in the region.
Ali Khan DET, United States Central Command
PM Nawaz Sharif should just appoint according to established protocol, which is in the interest of the country, and not according to his political needs. We have seen the disastrous consequences when Z A Bhutto bypassed the rules and the nation was stuck with Ziaul Huq and when Sharif appointed Musharraf and the nation got the taste of "moderate enlightenment."
Military's proclivity to rule is an ubiquitous headache in Egypt, Turkey, Burma, Thailand, and many other Asian and Middle Eastern countries. Spain, Portugal, and almost all of South America suffered the problem for decades. India does not have the military problem but 30 percent of its' legislature is composed of convicted criminals or those against whom criminal cases are pending: http://my.telegraph.co.uk/markulyseas/markulyseas/5150/incredible-india-criminals-in-indian-parliament/ . And let's not even talk about the sheikhs, emirs, and tin-pot dictators inundating all of Middle East. What makes Pakistan's case precarious is that it has an existential problem and desperately needs political and economic stability.
PM Nawaz Sharif therefore has a heavy responsibility to make the right move.
Pakistan needs to take a lesson from Turkey - if the civilian govt improves the economy and it's public image it can challenge and control the military. The govt needs to significantly reduce the military budget and redirect those funds to the people - should help bolster the economy while improving popularity of govt - win/win.
Starting treason proceedings just before appointing a new army chief is a master-stroke .It is to tell the new chief that the government means business vis-a-vis the army.On the other hand it may back-fire with the army not taking it lying down-the treatment meted out to their patriotic former general.
I truly hope that he makes the wrong decision again so our country can be saved.
Actually pakistan army generals are appointed by US and not Pakistan PM.
You don't even run an empire or a small business with succession planning! How could a decision not have been made weeks, if not months ago, when the military is busy fighting and has it's hands full. It is the worse example of decision making - whimsical, personal agenda and lack of respect for instituions...
The concept of "My man" just does not fit, when it comes to top slot in Pakistan Army. COAS is the most responsible son of the state. He has many problems on his shoulder & cannot be favoring one or the other. He has to see that the State of Pakistan is not compromised for one reason or the other. We expect that the new COAS will put every one in his place.
If you don't run the country like your business empire, you don't need to worry about anything. Total inaction, lack of governance, and leadership, and corruption is your hallmark. Just mend your ways.
hahahahaha sher must be gutted he can't put it off any longer