The transition that is most talked about these days is the presidential election, which is to be held in April next year. After the commencement of the Bonn process, it is the first election which President Hamid Karzai will not be contesting. Afghans are both excited and concerned about the presidential election as it can become a defining moment for the nascent democracy.
Interestingly, the least talked about transition is the one that would come about through reconciliation. This important transition lies on the back burner right now. Political observers are of the opinion that much will depend on the signing of the Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) between Afghanistan and the US. Results of the Afghan presidential election will be an important factor in shaping the future reconciliation process.
The real question is how far the cumulative impact of the aforementioned transitions can lead Afghanistan towards establishing peace and strengthening democracy. It is clear that unlike in the 1990s, almost all important international powers are deeply interested in the peace and stability of Afghanistan. Highly credible diplomatic sources in Kabul say that China and Russia have given a green signal to the Afghan government to enter into the BSA with the US for maintaining a small US force in Afghanistan. Russia has a few thousand troops stationed near the Afghan-Tajik border, which can get sucked in the conflict if it escalates. China can face the fallout of a chaotic Afghanistan in Xinjiang. So, all the stakeholders are bracing for the post-withdrawal scenarios. On November 10, there was a meeting among the diplomats of China, Russia and India in Delhi. All three countries have agreed to work together for peace and stability in Afghanistan. The new Iranian government is in the process of re-evaluating the country’s Afghan policy. Turkey is an active player in the Afghan endgame.
Afghan society has changed over the last decade. People have tasted political empowerment through elections. Education is spreading. There is a vibrant and dynamic media. Although governance and economy are facing serious challenges, the country is not torn by civil war like it was in the 1990s. Under these circumstances, will Pakistan revisit its Afghan policy and reform it on the basis of objective realities or stick to the traditional policy of insisting on exporting an ‘Islamic Emirate’ in our neighbouring country? This flawed policy has already damaged Pakistan and has great potential for inflicting further damage. It has no takers in Afghanistan and if Pakistan fails to grow out of this quagmire beyond 2014, it can lead to its international isolation. Pakistan cannot meaningfully engage with either the present Afghan government or other factions as long as it remains in a stiflingly tight embrace with the Taliban. Hence, our government’s rhetoric about ‘an Afghan-led and Afghan-owned process’ sounds hollow. We have to learn to befriend Afghanistan as a country and not confine our friendship to certain Afghan group(s). Last but not the least, the real issue between Pakistan and Afghanistan is not border management (that can be worked out in the long term) but the sourcing out of borders to militant groups and warlords. If both sides take effective steps to resolve it, they can create an atmosphere conducive to peace in the region.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 19th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (22)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Great analysis, paksitan has to revise its policies because better Afghanistan is in the favour of better Pakistan and the world so far, the time has come to bring chance the people of Afghanistan has suffered a lot from many years but they even get their freedom, which is their basic right, for which the timming is very important so seeing the ground realitites and human rights and the situation of the whole world Afghanistan should be peacefull. for which Pakistan had play role and should play role it would be better for the region especially for Pakistan its self.
@ Sterry
You are sadly off the mark in all your assessments as well. Street people are synonymous with Pakistan and India not Afghanistan.
The ANA and ANSF is doing a much better job of combating the Pakistani supported Taliban than the Pakistani military, which has no heart to take on the various militant outfits operating in Pakistan.
Your quote from William Camden is applicable to Pakistan, which deludes itself into thinking that it is the citadel of Islam and the heirs of Abdali, Ghaznavi, and Ghori when in reality Pakistan is just a colonial construct made up of Indian Muslims. If wishes were horses all Pakistanis would be riding straight to Arabia.
@Zalmai: I think you need to look at the ground reality and situation. You seem to equate the economies, level of education and stability of Pakistan with Afghanistan but you are sadly off the mark. Afghanistan is perhaps only a step ahead of Somalia. Why are the millions of illegal Afghan refugees in Pakistan refusing to go home to Afghanistan? The sad reality of most Afghans is that despite billions of Western aid, they are living like the poorest street people in Indian cities. There is saying by William Camden in the 17 th century that is worth repeating, "If wishes were horses, beggers would ride."
I think you are wrong about the Afghan army able to hold ground; I still remember seeing the Afghan Presidential Guard run away when there was an attack on Karzai. That's why he relies on Western bodyguards. I think the myth of Afghan fighting spirit is just that - hiding in the mountains for hit and run tactics can go on forever. The world needs to brace for another flood of asylum seekers from Afghanistan hiding in ships and sneaking about airports with phoney papers !
@ Ali
"The week points of Afghanistan poverty, disunity, lack of education and political awareness" are your reasons for Afghanistan becoming a playground for "Those that want to exchange their power out of their territory"; If you engaged in a little bit of introspection you would realize that Pakistan is suffering from the same problems but on a much larger scale.
@Ali
On the contrary, Pakistan has turned into a battleground between the forces of Shias and Sunnis, Punjabis and Baloch, Mohajir against everyone else and last but not least TTP against the state.
The literacy rate in Pakistan is no better than Afghanistan and its economy is nonexistent. Political awareness surely escapes a state that has not been able to create a nation out of its people after 67 years of social engineering.
It is Pakistan that lacks a stable government and plays the role of spoiler, in the region.
Afghanistan is rising from the ashes of war and devastation and it has finally found its moorings and it is going to soar ever higher despite the efforts of its enemies to keep it bogged down by supporting factionalism and identity politics.
Good article. Kudos to the author.
Do you really believe this is going to be the end of the game? I hope so, but I don't think if its going to happen, we will see. As long as there is not a stable government in Afghanistan and get to know how to be part of the game in the region. It is not going to happen. Today Afghanistan is good playground for those who wants exchange their power out of their territory. It is because the players understand the week points of the Afghans which are poverty, disunity and lack of education as well as political awareness.
@ Alann
I was contemplating a response to Oats but then I saw your post and figured that you set the record straight and saved me the headache of enlightening a brainwashed Zaid Hamid disciple. Well done!
@Oats: "In 1947, Afghanistan allied itself with India and has been using its country as a base for Indian aggression ever since. This is confirmed by US sources including the US Defense Secretary Chuck Hegel."
"India using Afghanistan as base to attack Pakistan. This has been confirmed by Chuck Hegel" "Talibanis are being paid by RAW/ Indians/ Hindus to create violence all across Pakistan" "Mumbai attack was an inside job. Indian official himself confirmed it." "Malala is a CIA agent." "500 million people in India don't have access to toilets and live on less than 2$ a day." "'Secular Democratic' Indian trolls who want the massacrer of thousands of Muslims, Modi, as PM should not give lectures to Pakistanis" "The so-called biggest democracy of the world has killed more than 100000 Kashmiris and continue to do so." "Terrorism in Pakistan exists only because of drones." "Zionist Israelis should stop killing our Palestinian brothers." "We have the mighty air force and army which are way superior to those of the Indians. India's Tejas is no match for our JF-17s." "If Indians boast so much about themselves and call us the 'epicentre of terrorism', then why don't they come attack us? It is because they are scared of our nuclear weapons which are way better than the ones Indians have which keep failing." "All of India's satellites keep getting destroyed soon after they are launched. India should spent all its money on its 500 million poor instead." "Enough is enough! Pakistan should just shoot down the Indian(/Afghan/US/Iranian) planes. We should not tolerate this breach of sovereignty by those filthy Hindus and RAW agents." "Kashmir always was part of Pakistan even before India came into existence. Filthy Indians stole it by deception and will have to pay for it soon." "India is stealing Pakistan's water for years. IWT was a propaganda used by India to trick Pakistan."
Anything else I missed? And these are the usual comments by the "literate" sane-looking Pakistanis. I did not even mention Zaid Hamid's quotes!
The million dollar question is not whether or not Afghanistan will implode once the West leaves but when. Obviously this will be bad for all neighboring countries including Pakistan who don't want to be swamped by refugees burdening the economy as well as the violence and lawlessness that comes with them. Unfortunately, the author's rosy picture of the post withdrawal scenario ignores the reality that many Afghani stakeholders have already hedged their bets. Think about the billions of aid that is stashed abroad by the corrupt politicians there. Without any source of income or economy, Afghanis in Afghanistan will be in worse shape than even the Afghani refugees who live on welfare and social assistance in Western countries. Unfortunately, there is the real risk that Afghanistan will return to being an Indian client state from which attacks will be mounted against Pakistan. In 1947, Afghanistan allied itself with India and has been using its country as a base for Indian aggression ever since. This is confirmed by US sources including the US Defense Secretary Chuck Hegel. So its unfair to single out Pakistan alone. I agree Pakistan should not get involved but how about fencing and mining the border so no Afghanis- not only refugees who burden the country but criminals who commit crimes can come in?
ETBLOGS1987
@afzaal khan: Because this policy is not owned by civilians of any party. It is owned by the military.
We have to learn to befriend Afghanistan as a country . That means that Afghan gets to choose it's own policies - and if it wants to befriend India or anybody else it's none of your business.
Mr. Khattak Party was in power for last 5 years why they didn't change the policy? Mr. Khattak party along with PPP control senate so why doesn't he raise the question about policy change there?
Excellent Analysis, Pakistan has to revise its policies. Everything is going to change, the next move from any of the sides will bring the change, sufferings are part of change and we have been used to sufferings so why not for a positive change.
Excellent and crystal clear analysis. I honestly believe that it was long overdue for Pakistan to take a stock of debilitating fall out of its forward policy popularized and legitimized as a "strategic depth". What does it entail i am afraid even the proponent of the idea were not cleared either. At the least it was pregnant with idea of helping Afghans install a govt. to help Pakistan, which is popularly known as aspiring to have a client state. This expansive ideal though instinctive was practically tantamount to punching above weight. Prudence would dictate to settle for something realistic and less ambitious as the cost and benefit calculus is horrendously negative. The bargain our policy maker passionately yearned and diligently scrambled for did not pay off handsomely as was erroneously speculated. In the process we earned a whole hog of infamous reputations that would turn out to be too demanding to erase let alone the concomitant existential threat it has brought about. Let us be rational as that is the only and the sole recourse to protect ourselves and our national interest.
I suggest Pakistan wait till it finds out the way the $$$ start flowing.
Excellent analysis! The days of Pakistan exporting an Islamic Emirate are over. Pakistan needs to fend off its own looming Emirate in Waziristan and Punjab.
People seem to be thinking that something big is going to occur by end of next year...we can safely predict that tens of thousands of US troops will remain in Afghanistan(come 2015),the new President will be as ineffective and a stooge of the powers that be,as the previous one. So in summary, nothing is going to change and chaos will reign supreme in and around Afghanistan.