OGRA scam: IHC declares Tauqir Sadiq's sentence null and void

On May 7, a court in Rawalpindi had given Sadiq a three year sentence for non-attendence in court.


Web Desk November 11, 2013
Former Ogra chief Tauqir Sadiq. PHOTO: FILE.

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court declared former Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra) chief Tauqir Sadiq’s three-year sentence null and void, Express News reported on Monday.

A hearing was presented in front of a two-member bench, which, after evidence was presented by both sides, voided Sadiq’s sentence. His request for bail was subsequently also dismissed.

Sadiq was the main accused in the Rs82 billion scam and, according to an interim reference provided by NAB, had provided undue financial relief to firms and individuals and issued licences for CNG stations on bogus documents.

On May 7, a court in Rawalpindi had given Sadiq a three-year sentence for non-attendance in court. The NAB prosecuter argued that Sadiq had fled to Dubai and according to NAB Ordinance Clause 31, he could be tried for non-attendance.

Sadiq’s advocate said that his client was charged based on false statements after National Accountability Bureau (NAB) officials brought him back to Pakistan from Dubai.

Advocate Sardar Asmatullah had maintained in his client’s bail application that he was put behind bars while NAB had failed to produce any substantial proof. He had argued that his client had remained in custody for more than 60 days and the authorities had failed to recover anything from his possession.

According to NAB's interim reference, Ogra Member (Gas) Mansoor Muzaffer Ali, Member (Finance) Kamal Farid Bijarani and Chairman’s Staff Officer Jawad Jameel were also involved in the scam.

On November 25 last year, the apex court had struck down Sadiq’s appointment as Ogra chairman.  He had fled the country and NAB officials had brought him back to Pakistan on July 9, 2013. He was kept at the bureau’s headquarters and produced for the first time in court in July.

COMMENTS (7)

sick | 11 years ago | Reply

CANT believe this

Parvez Amin | 11 years ago | Reply

Corruption cases are difficult to prove because it is nearly impossible to find the quality of proof required by our laws. It appears reasonable to appoint a commission of judges who have suffered the pain of knowing that accused is guilty, but the prosecution is unable to prove it due to laws framed a long time ago when society was not as complex. The commission should be given the mandate for bringing about changes in our laws that will yield a higher percentage of convictions of those accused of corruption. If you want to make a shandar Pakistan, the heavens will not drop it in your lap. You have to make plans and execute them. If they don't work, find out why and make corrections. Do that over and over again till you get what you want. The key word is persistence.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ