World tells Pakistan to shape up in exchange for aid

FM says reconciliation was "basically an Afghan initiative", but that Pakistan was there to facilitate.


Afp October 15, 2010

BRUSSELS:


World powers told Pakistan that post-flood aid was part of a "two-way" deal on reform Friday, as Islamabad also offered to lend a hand to regional peace by facilitating Afghan-Taliban talks.

After US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton demanded Pakistan's "affluent and elite" be made to pay through tax changes, ministers attending a major aid meeting on Pakistan also insisted there would be no gain without some pain.

For Pakistan to "become more stable," German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said, "you can harvest as much money as you want, it won't be enough at the end of the day if there is no reform."

"An adjustment in the equilibrium between rich and poor in Pakistan" was fundamental, he said.

The meeting of the Friends of Democratic Pakistan came as the World Bank and Asian Development Bank estimated damages for Pakistan's devastating floods since July at 9.7 billion dollars -- almost twice the amount of its 2005 earthquake.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague, who said London had already ploughed some 134 million pounds (215 million dollars) of aid into its former colonial territory, also underlined that "there are necessary reforms in Pakistan and they should include a widening of the tax base."

But he said Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi had "stressed in the meeting that the government of Pakistan is fully cognisant of what they need to do."

Stepping into the Brussels talks, gathering 26 countries and international groups, Qureshi said "there are more reforms in the pipeline."

He also offered Islamabad's services for "reconciliation" in Afghanistan, saying a peaceful neighbour was in his country's interests.

Reconciliation was "an Afghan initiative," he said. "They have to own it, they have to lead it. We are there to help, we are there to facilitate."

An EU source had warned before the talks concluded that backers were "not signing any blank cheques."

"It's a two-way street," the source added, indicating EU foreign affairs chief Catherine Ashton's view that "unprecedented support cannot be expected without profound changes" in the way Pakistan runs its economy.

"We must make sure where the money goes," said one diplomat. "We expect clear commitments."

The floods affected 21 million people, with 12 million in need of emergency help by UN estimates.

To date the United States and the EU have provided around 450 million dollars each in aid to Pakistan.

Europe has also offered a major trade boost, proposing to lift duties on 75 imports as part of an aid-linked package.

But the three-year suspension of duties still requires a waiver from the World Trade Organisation.

And Italy's Foreign Minister Franco Frattini warned that his country retains reservations, hinting that Rome's backing would be conditional on India failing to obtain similar concessions in the WTO.

"Under certain limitations we can go ahead," Frattini said. "I am ready but on condition."

Qureshi on Thursday told the European parliament that Islamabad's fledgling democracy was on the march after ending a decade of military rule in 2008.

"Obviously it takes time. Old habits die hard," he said. "You have to be patient."

COMMENTS (3)

T. Ali | 13 years ago | Reply I agree with Meekal, enough time has elapsed, but every government considers it its privilege and perk to indulge in abuse and plunder. What can you expect in a country where the spouse of a VVIP allegedly claims a VAT refund of 87,000 Pounds at London Heathrow, while the country is going around the world with a begging bowl.
Sajjad Ashraf | 13 years ago | Reply What more time? to loot and plunder i the name of democracy. Sorry Sir. With thse brigades of ministers of advisors there is no governance. Shocking to see the amount of taxes and the users charges the rich DO NOT pay. Do a simple check - get the total value of electricity consumed by the ministers and advisors in a year and you will be able to build a power plant in that sum.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ