The flavour of the month has not really changed all that much since the PPP freeloaders were replaced by hangers-on from the Muslim League-Nawaz. Another person might have got to live in the house on the hill where they chomp Cuban cigars and serve seven course meals. But the dollar is still 106 rupees and there are no visible signs that it will weaken. Different prime ministers and heads of state have different ways of pulling the strings that make the marionettes dance. But none of them has been able to remove that feeling of uncertainty, of temporariness and insecurity, which is still there. To make things worse, there is this relentless drip of depression which has pervaded and continues to pervade almost every walk of life. Not to mention the alarming increase in the crime rate during the last 10 years and the helplessness of the police to stop men and women from getting mugged.
People appear to have lost whatever sense of decency they once had. Sure, Pakistan is a failed state. There can be no doubt about that. But it wasn’t always like this. In the Golden Age, the 1950s, when a dollar cost four rupees and a pound fetched six, people from Mirpur operated the looms and spindles of Yorkshire and Lancashire and jute and cotton exports kept the wheels of commerce turning in Karachi and Dacca. Girls used to cycle to school and Government College Lahore was the centre of the universe. We still had the railways and the other administrative gift that the British left behind called The Rule of Law. Things were very different in the 1970s, when the two nation theory was unceremoniously given the last rites without much compunction in the western wing.
But we didn’t have the internal menace of the militants, the suicide bombers who believe they’ll go to heaven if they send you to hell; and the deliberate targeting of ethnic and religious minorities. That came much later. We had a charismatic leader who rode to victory on the crest of a hugely popular wave and succeeded in destroying the economic and industrial base established by Pakistan’s first military dictator. He was succeeded by the country’s most retrogressive head of state who unleashed such a torrent of religious edicts that the nation has never really recovered from the fallout and in a sense, helped to usher in the Dark Ages. The militants, in a rather convoluted sense, are part of his legacy — a bequest we could cheerfully do without but which appears to be part of our heritage. Perhaps, they’ll soon have their TV channel.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 27th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (17)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Janaab Anwar Mooraj for (the "Great") DICTATOR !!! That in essence is what this gentleman is saying to his .... (whatever) ... if "Pakistan" is to get out of this present mess.... or are the rest of you (readers, Editors, moderators... etc etc) that blind to understand this simple fact ??? Make him the "GD" (see above for the full-expansion) and ALL your so-called "problems" will be solved, trust me!
@Np: Hey I wasn't born then, I am recounting stories told by my grandmothers and aunts. But the way I see it, not just Punjab, cities like Karachi and Islamabad were also thriving. Bangladesh was NOT the fault of the common people, that was Yahya and the government wanting to deprive the 'great unwashed' as Bengalis were perceived of their rights borne out of a superiority complex. Although i think due to the distance between eastern and western wings, it was better and Bangladesh's thriving economy proves it was for the best. Anyway, it was a golden period but political tussle for power, media control, spread of conservatism and brainwashing of the entire population resulted in the downfall. Pakistan was a new country, not without its problems, but it was on the right trajectory. Even after 1971, we could have learnt from our mistakes, moved on and become stronger, instead the country was slowly destroyed as the social and moral fabric crumbled under the guise of 'religion'. I am a fairly regularly praying, fasting Muslim and do believe in these Islamic rites as a part of religion but this fanatacism and loss of humainty has gone out of control.
Depressing article - and yeah it's past time for action. Believe it or not the one thing the "establishment" fears is the people - time to demonstrate for something other than arcane Blasphemy laws. I suggest you start with demanding your elected govt take control of the military - democracy is a shame without control of the military.
@x: If 50s and 60s were such a golden period, why did majority of your population disown your country in 1971? Was the 2nd amendment criminalizing Ahmadi worship passed by Zia? Was the Objective resolution passed by Zia? Think about it. It may have been a golden period for Punjabi Muslims but not all Pakistanis can say that.
@observer:
Great point!
Pakistan did not become Pakistan in one day. It was a gradual process that began in the 40s and continues to this day.
Pakistan is becoming every day Pakistan, away from being India.
That explains the different trajectories both countries have taken since independence.
Have we not had enough of lamenting by this time? When will we start talking about remedies? The remedies perhaps do not exist. We have to necessarily learn how to relax and enjoy the rape.
The 50's and 60's was an era for great dreams and optimism. As someone who was not born then please someone explain to me how this enlighnted generation stood back and let Pakistan fall apart. You cannot just blame General Zia
Working backwards in time:
The militants: a gift of the Army, and the love affair still continues (50,000 dead notwithstanding)
The retrogressive dictator we got in 1977: a gift of the Army
The civilian who destroyed our economic base in the 1970's: a gift of the Army
The break up of the country: also a gift from the Army
In the Golden Age, the 1950s, when a dollar cost four rupees and a pound fetched six, people from Mirpur operated the looms and spindles of Yorkshire and Lancashire and jute and cotton exports kept the wheels of commerce turning in Karachi and Dacca. Girls used to cycle to school and Government College Lahore was the centre of the universe. We still had the railways and the other administrative gift that the British left behind called The Rule of Law. Things were very different in the 1970s, when the two nation theory was unceremoniously given the last rites without much compunction in the western wing.
To tell you the truth, till the 1970's Pakistan was full of Indians. It was populated with people who were born and raised as Indians.They studied in Indian school with Indian Curricula. The same history, the same civics and the same sciences.
In the 1980's and thereafter Pakistan was gradually taken over by Pakistanis i.e. people born and raised as Pakistanis. And they imbibed Pakistani version of history, civics ad the sciences.
A cry in the wilderness, is how I look at it. As the battle between citizens holding guns in their hands and wanting to impose themselves on all gets fiercer, violence could spiral out of control. When every individuals idea of what Pakistan should be varies, chaos is the result. Can the country not find some common human values that can act as a glue, rather than a Constitution that divides and discriminates between them ?
I remember my grandmother's stories of the glorious 50s/60s when she would cycle to school, walk in the park, there would be private parties attended by literary stars/bureaucrats/businessmen,etc and discussion, freedom and individuality was thriving. I cannot imagine the time she used to speak of but I wish the course of history had not changed so drastically.
What drastic action?
They will rule Pakistan, and own ALL the TV channel
if by drastic action,you mean a revolution,then better keep waiting...the region of subcontinent consist of people who are beholden to the land,are docile,always subdued by the invader.
@Author: "This, of course, is not likely to ever happen in a country like ours where ostentation and living beyond our means is a way of life "
Sir your this statement sums it all. This disease is as old as late Mughal period when part of Delhi red fort was mortgaged to the traders of Chandni Chok. Pakistan took this rote right from 1950s and lived beyond her means.
Don't they already have their own TV channel or rather quite a few masquerading as private entertainment TV channels .