Many anchors who used to tell us how Musharraf’s visit to Washington was a resounding success, during his generalissimo tenure, now enlighten us that the PM’s interactions there amounted to a dishonourable and treacherous surrender. If these know-it-alls were at all to be placated, the PM would have to return home with Dr Aafia Siddiqui on the plane, goodie bags full of financial aid, a civilian nuclear deal and a big apology for the drone attacks. While some of these wishes are not as irrational as they sound, demanding fulfilment from a government that has been in power barely for months is simply beyond comprehension. It was as if they desperately wanted the visit to fail.
Of course, there is nothing new about this attitude. While our electronic media was very empathetic during Pervez Musharraf’s rule, except perhaps, his twilight years, for civilian administrations it had an altogether different approach. I am sure you have not forgotten the media circus on the Kerry-Lugar-Berman Bill and the Memogate scandal. Those who didn’t question at the time, Musharraf’s arbitrary decision to offer bases to the US on our soil, went into a spin over a piece of unsigned paper. This, of course, shows where our loyalties actually are and normally I wouldn’t have taken an exception to it for the deep state too, is part of our own country. But the trouble is that this disconnect ensures that whenever our civilian administration and the establishment lobby for different things we end up weakening our case and bring demons like the Pressler Amendment upon us.
A friend recently opined that anchors speak too much just because they really fear that if they are silent for a few minutes their brains will start working. But jokes aside, one strong opinion is that our Urdu media is dominated by right-wing radicals who instinctively abhor the West. But this can only partially be true, for the Western world finds ways to work with them and even empower them.
The second explanation is that a majority of our anchors and other related media men do not have a true understanding of the subtleties of foreign policy issues and hence, bank on crude generalisations and cliches in their presentations. Again, it is very difficult for me to accept this explanation because I have seen many who are endowed with an excellent understanding of such crucial policy matters.
Perhaps, the most cogent explanation is that, owing to dysfunctional rating systems, the television industry in Pakistan has convinced itself that only America bashing, radical views and baser elements can be sold on air. Hence, you were bound to see discussions and reports during the PM’s visit on your cable channels projecting Aafia Siddiqui, drone attacks and the US partnership with India as the only issues between the two countries. This also leads to the irony often witnessed that the anchors and programmes that are most vocal against America are being courted by their embassy here. Hey, the foreign missions here have to rely on most viewed channels and shows to convey their message. So what if the anchor or the channel in question had said something really derogatory against the same country only minutes ago.
But no matter what the real reason is, this mad rush has to stop. Not only do we misguide our viewers in the vain hope of a momentary rating spike but also hurt our national interest by radicalising our audience. Well researched and well argued shows can get you good rating, regardless of your leaning.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 26th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
President Obama and Prime Minister Sharif held wide-ranging discussions at the White House during the Prime Minister’s visit last week. They spoke about the importance of a U.S.-Pakistan partnership built on a foundation of mutual interest and respect. They acknowledged the substantial progress in the bilateral relationship over the last year and noted its resilient nature. The President and the Prime Minister affirmed U.S.-Pakistan friendship and close cooperation and recalled our positive contributions to international peace and security at crucial junctures during the Cold War and in the post-9/11 period. Reaffirming the strong relationship between the two countries, they stressed that our enduring partnership is based on the principles of respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. They expressed their conviction that an enduring U.S.-Pakistan partnership is vital to regional and international security and recognized their shared interest in Pakistan’s economic growth and development, regional stability, and mutually determined measures to counter terrorism. President Obama conveyed appreciation for Pakistan’s internal and regional security challenges and affirmed that a peaceful, prosperous, and democratic Pakistan was an essential partner for the United States in the advancement of shared goals of peace, security, and socio-economic development in South Asia.
Let us focus on the positives of the meetings and dialogues the Prime Minister had with the U.S. leadership during his four days trip. Let us not forget that President Obama thanked the Prime Minister for visiting the United States, and both Leaders committed themselves to remaining in close contact and to continuing their efforts to build a strong, broad-based, long-term, and enduring relationship between the United States and Pakistan that should serve as a foundation for the stability and prosperity of the region and around the globe.
Abdul Quddus DET-United States Central Command,
So the author just wants Pakistan to accept whatever the masters tell us. Thanks buddy we are already doing that.
@lancersboy History will repeat itself. What happened in 1990's in Afghanistan with all its ill effects on Pakistan.
Why should Pakistan media be different from all the other world medias? Hysteria and noise is par for the course, and rational, objective reporting from most media outlets went out the window years ago.
@BruteForce: What ever,good thing in 2014 will be that India and RAW will be kicked out of Afghanistan,good riddence. Let history decide who will be where?
Relative to the reception received by Zardari and the "demand" letter from the 'deep state' that Zardari took with him, Sharif has done relatively well. On the one hand media and govt. is demonizing the US for drone attacks, etc. and on the other they expect their PM to be treated on a red carpet. Wake up! This is not a Bollywood movie. In diplomacy a long strategy is followed. In Pakistan every new administration has a new strategy!
@Pakistani: Even God cannot solve your problems my dear, till you all remain "Ostrich" and dont see around.
In the absence of Investigative journalism, Media has to resort to sensationalism, to stay relevant. Media it seems lives in a cocoon and has no idea about how the World looks at Pakistan and why OR it suffers from a greater degree of radicalization than its readers. Media also has played its role in landing Pakistan in the sorry state it finds itself, as averse to initiating change with an positive agenda and outlook. Maturity in behaviour and actions is totally lacking.
Let 2014 arrive, most of the Americans leave from Afghanistan, when they no longer will need the supply routes through Pakistan, we'll really see what is the Pakistani stock in US.
I mean why on Earth will Pakistan get any treatment. Its economy is not in G20, has sheltered dangerous Terrorists, blocked American supply routes, allowed its Territory to be used by anti-American forces.
Nobody is even worrying about that in Pakistan. Well, you all will find out in a couple of years. I am certainly waiting for 2014 December.
Author with reference to the title: 'Our media's war' USA/Coalition bombs our country daily with drones. CIA funded agencies are reeking havoc and radicalism in Baluchistan and KP so that we cannot excavate it to prosper, we are consistently degraded in the international community when USA aligns with India's stance in Pak-India disputes, USA forced us into a war we simply do not have the means to fight Then, my dear author, you dare say 'media's war'? It is Pakistan's war with the USA. Shame on PML-N voters who brought such spineless rulers above us, who will never ever muster enough courage to even squeak before a nation they treat as a deity. Slaves voting for slaves.
Well said! Even the educated, urban, well off classes (I know I'm stereotyping but anyway) conform to these views and fall for these conspiracy theories, simple minded rhetoric and xyz bashing in their misguided self perception of patriotism. These same people would love to settle/marry/study abroad and seek shortcuts like the government they criticize. We are a nation of hypocrites. It would be fine if we used these double standards to get ahead instead of shooting off the mouth and shooting ourselves in the foot, time and time again.
When Modi is elected PM of India, this same media as well as deep state will instantly forget about America.
There is a need for open and transparent discussions on all issues in Pakistani media - different sides of the issues need to be heard regardless if they please the select few mullahjis and mullahtypes as the world awaits and we are stuck using and abusing not just our religion but the nation and its people - as well as those nations and those peoples who feed us and are trying to help us
I want Hillary Clinton as next Prime Minister of Pakistan and things will be better of that.
Can we even radicalize our audience even more? not sure if this is even possible.
When we are dependent on US dole, we are lucky even our PM got this much respect. Everyday we make fun of poverty in India..people sleeping on pavements in India have more dignity than what we do for our existence....