Jibran, who came to my attention when he stood as an independent candidate in the recent elections, has the right idea and as unworkable as it may initially sound, he may be on to something. Admittedly, he’s targeting the already converted since he’s spreading the idea via social media, but there is a trickle-down effect that can be achieved — there are not many degrees of separation between people like us who will listen to his appeal, the local imams we will approach and those who will listen to that imam.
We all know the hatred often spewed in sermons, which ranges from the nightmarish, where the imam damns everyone to hell, to the downright ridiculous. My father claims that an imam in a village in Punjab insisted we must be grateful that elephants don’t have wings for if they did, we would live in constant fear of them one day landing on and destroying our houses. True story. Unfortunately, since it is coming from someone who is supposed to know what they are talking about, even the downright ridiculous can easily become shrouded in an air of legitimacy.
But there are still some imams willing to open up to dialogue of the kind Jibran is hoping to start and he has claimed that his friends have already found four such imams. It may seem like a small number, but honestly, four imams, four mosques, hundreds of worshippers. I may be naive but I believe the smallest difference can have the biggest impact in the future. We have a massive problem on our hands in terms of how skewed religion is becoming and it is our responsibility to tackle it, no matter how small the scale may be. It may be near impossible to de-radicalise the radicalised, but there is still a big chunk of society that means well and just need’s to be made to understand the moderate way of the religion it so passionately believes in, particularly the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him)’s promise to protect Christians and all that he has said about protecting minority rights. And why stop there? What about extending this to all that is positive and humanitarian in his teachings?
I am aware that there is much in religion that is controversial and open to interpretation, but there are certain things that rational imams themselves, no matter how few are out there, will not be able to disagree with. Can you really argue with phrases, for instance, like “Their churches are to be respected” and “No compulsion is to be on them”?
I am also aware — and this frustrates me no end — that imams might not be easily approachable by women, but women who attend dars can at least speak to those who deliver them to take out time to condemn the attacks as well. Getting the message across anywhere is better than nowhere at all.
Jibran has admitted that it is a slow and arduous process but he is making progress. And I believe his idea has potential. Even if it’s because, in a battle we appear to be losing, I fear I have no choice.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 2nd, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (14)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Naveed Alam Khattak: Appreciated.............and its good to know that I am not alone on this.
So what's stopping you from getting rid of the Imam's who spout hate? - you get together and demand he leave, stop funding him, and make it clear to his replacement that hate mongering won't be tolerated. Bad preachers aren't confined to Islam - and in other faiths they seem to find a way of weeding out the bad ones.
@Parvez::::: 101% right........ These countries have strong hold on their mosques and if someone will say something wrong, the very next day he will find himself in a prison. They are throwing money to our extremists organisations through our mosques and spreading hate. Our maulvi can say anything about our govt and no one is there to hold him responsible for this.
Except Shia and Brelvi Imams, the rest are foot soldiers of Taliban and in disguise they act as recruiters. Shia Imams are too scared and Brevli are busy collecting money for different projects. For those who already are not willing, the process starts with Tableighi Jamat who convinces general public to come to mosques. From there, willing ones are recruited for terrorist organizations. Its a very sophisticated process in which most of the recruits do not know the real motive of the recruiters. Asking these Imams any help is very dangerous. They are not a cure of the problem but themselves a problem. As a first step we should stay away from these Imams and never ask any question from them.
In Turkey Imans are strictly controlled. Only state licensed Imans are allowed to practice. If Imans gave sermons which incited violence they would be arrested, tried and jailed. Also Saudi Arabia and the gulf states are NOT allowed to fund madrassas. Arabs are FORBIDDEN from interfering in the religious affairs of the Turkish state. This is a country we can learn from.
The incitement to extreme violence from the Imams is common. The majority ignores it but some take it to their hearts. The innocent majority then bears the brunt.
Convincing imams is tricky, I agree. But my experience shows it is not only Imams that need change of heart. I know many people who always find excuses fir these killings. They refer to 'them' conquering Muslim lands and killing in war including drone attacks. It appears we have come to a dead end. Our imams want blind followers and not critical ones. I have never, I repeat never seen an imam admitting liberal stand and changing his mind. Like Imran Khan they think it has something to do with our involvement with war on terror. People who live in west and have contact with local communities ( which is rare) must face criticism and it is not an easy job. Many think if you think if 'they' are anti Muslim what the heck we are doing here. And more are wanting to enter.
Anything given to "interpretation" is suspect in the eyes of science and common sense. In the twenty first century, the mullahs are still talking as if the earth is centuries younger! While those outside religion (any religion) go on raising questions on things they do not know and devote their time finding answers, here are a few who still spend time "interpreting" religious teaching not only for themselves but also others!
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2013/09/27/news/imams-denounce-al-shabab
This story about imams in Kenya denouncing the group behind the attacks there ties in with this oped and offers some hope.
Why don't the common people in the society take the pulpit sometime? Why don't we give the youngsters an Imam they look up to? Why don't we talk about everything under the sun in a mosque?
A step in the right direction - but too little, too late. This should have been done collectively by the 'moderate Muslim majority' long back not just in Pakistan, but all over the world.
Hopefully this will turn the tide...
Good intentions but naivity is just too much too bear
Jibrans initiative is commendable but in order to fast track it so that it would have an impact on the masses, the involvement of the government is necessary. I have been told that in other Muslim countries the Friday sermon is supplied by the government and if the imam is found not be following the guidelines, he is made to answer for it. The problem with this system is that the same countries that keep a tight hold on their mosque pulpits, have over the years established a strong foothold over our mosques pulpits in order to enforce their agenda and our authorities have either been bought or convinced and so allow them to operate. In a country so dominated by religion, is it not worth asking as to why this aspect has been been so irresponsibly handled, that the country is bleeding because of it..........or was that the very object of the exercise.
Stupendous, thought-provoking article. Welcome back Saleha Riaz