'Political conspiracy' against Musharraf: APML

Political forces behind the illegal detention are emboldening extremists, says Musharraf’s political adviser.


Abdul Manan September 30, 2013
Pervez Musharraf. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE

LAHORE: The All Pakistan Muslim League (APML) protested against the continued detention of military dictator Pervez Musharraf, terming it "a part of an elaborate political conspiracy contrary to justice and the rule of law."

In a press statement, Musharraf’s political adviser Chaudry Sarfraz Anjum Kahlon stated that the former president "was being punished for protecting the unity and integrity of Pakistan against violent actors.”

"All cases currently registered against Musharraf are politically orientated and devoid of any reality or legal merit. It is a grave injustice that the former president has been incarcerated for near to six months and serious questions are being raised about the validity of the legal process."

Kahlon added that "those political forces behind the unjust and illegal detention of Musharraf are inadvertently emboldening extremists, terrorists and foreign backed separatists in Pakistan."

Kahlon further said that "certain political forces wish to create an intolerable situation for Musharraf in the hope that he will leave Pakistan, but they will fail in their malicious designs as a Pakistani soldier always overcomes challenges and lives only for his country and people."

COMMENTS (20)

Muhammad Toheed | 11 years ago | Reply

Musharaf is a true leader and he have all those abilities that should be in a good leader and he pushed up pakistan,s economy and progress but unfortunately people does not deserve. sorry if i hurted anyone.

Sidster | 11 years ago | Reply

@syed Imran: Your freedom to speak was due to President Musharraf's liberalization of Media. If it was the 1980's you would find yourself in a ditchc after get a beaten of a lifetime.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ