It feels like 1989

Nations who do not learn from history are destined to make a fool of themselves.


Shivam Vij September 19, 2013
The writer is a journalist in Delhi whose work has appeared in The Christian Science Monitor and The New York Times. He tweets @DilliDurAst

As Hindu-Muslim violence in western Uttar Pradesh killed 50 people this month, many expressed sadness at the ‘return’ of communal strife in India. We had been free of inter-religious violence since Gujarat 2002, the commentators said, but alas, here we go, again. Strange how we forgot that around the same time last year (July-September 2012) violence between Bodos and Bengali-speaking Muslims in Assam had left 77 dead and 400,000 displaced. The reason why we forget Assam would be taken by people of the north-east is another proof that the north-east is only notionally India. But it’s also part of the Indian national amnesia. We forget.

Forgetting is good. How much can a nation grieve? Even better than forgetting is to not take note. The home ministry said that India had seen 451 incidents of inter-religious violence in 2012, and this year already 410 until western Uttar Pradesh lost its cool.

In the year 2000, a retired corporate guru, Gurcharan Das, wrote a book called India Unbound. I was in school and remember being completely in thrall of the book. Those were the dotcom boom years, we were entering a new millennium; India was supposed to be finally achieving its tryst with destiny. At long last, now that we had discarded Nehruvian Socialism and embraced Capitalism, now that call centres had done away with the need of aping the West’s industrial revolution, we were poised for greatness. Das, who writes beautifully, had convinced me that India had achieved its second and final freedom in 1991, with economic liberalisation. The idea that this was a second independence was so strong in the book that it suggested India had made a new beginning and the old evils of caste, corruption, communalism and so on, would all be obsolete with prosperity.

It’s unfair to single out Gurcharan Das, because that had been the dominant narrative until recently. From Indians and foreigners alike, one heard the phrase ‘new India’ so often that it seemed old India had disappeared into the Indian Ocean. But, slowly, old India crept back, with too many flashbacks, a bit like the climax of a Bollywood movie. If it seemed tensions over affirmative action were over with the Mandal agitation of 1991, they were back with ‘Mandal II’ in 2006. If one thought the Bhopal gas tragedy was a matter of history, controversies about it returned. If, in the 1980s, the Punjab militancy had haunted us, the Maoists stand out as a sore thumb in the ‘India story’. If the conflict experts had declared Kashmir a ‘post-conflict situation’, the Valley shut up the experts in and since 2008. Just like when Kashmir took to arms in 1989, Afghanistan is on the precipice of a change of guard. If economic desperation was one explanation for the rise and appeal of Hindu nationalists, the BJP is having a second go at exploiting economic disenchantment by using fascism. Lord Ram is now a Gujarati. If economic liberalisation was supposed to end the crony capitalism of the so-called ‘mixed economy’, crony capitalism has increased by leaps and bounds. Nice guy Manmohan’s government gives us scam after scam, so reminiscent of the government of his mentor, Narasimha Rao.

The more things change, the more they deja vu. This year feels not like brave youth but teenage anxiety. Nations who do not learn from history are destined to make a fool of themselves. We are constantly told to ‘move on’. But what do you do with the wounds? You pretend they don’t exist and the gangrene spreads. We don’t solve our problems, we manage them. We do not punish our rioters, or banish the people looting the economy, and we do not tell ourselves lies about the regions that take up arms against Delhi.

Then, at some point, we will decide to ‘move on’. We will get so tired of being sad that we will become happy again. We will be so happy, we will forget we were ever sad. Mushkilen itni padi mujh per ki asaan ho gayi. That Mirza Ghalib still knows our emotions better than us says something about how much you can move on.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 20th, 2013.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (31)

Anand | 11 years ago | Reply

ET moderator, what is it that you find objectionable with this post? This is my 3rd atempt.

@gp65

"Yes it is like 1989 in many ways: - Congress corruption at peak (remember Bofors)"

What about Bofors? Has anyone been indicted? In a court of law? How many times we were reminded of Narendra Modi’s innocence, since no court has indicted him? In context, since Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination BJP led Govt. ruled for 2,243 days and BJP supported other assorted non-Congress PMs ruled for another 1,222 days. That’s almost nine and half years. May be you can tell us what did they do during this time to unravel this Bofors mystery. Using a conjured past for current and future mischief is a typically fascist trait.

"- Congress dynastic rule at peak (then it was Rajiv, now it is Rahul)."

An association fallacy designed to appeal to emotion. Rajiv in ’89 (upto 2nd Dec’) was the PM. What is Rahul today? Whom and what exactly he is ruling? What peak he has climbed? He is not a cabinet minister, he has not been anointed as Congress’s prime ministerial candidate and he has not been made the Chairman of the campaign committee for 2014 election, at least not as yet. And why it is ‘rule’ when it is Congress, and Government/Administration when it’s BJP? Petty mischief I suppose. After Rajiv there have been only two PMs from Congress, none a Gandhi; and between them they have managed 14 years 86 days and still counting. And before that it was possible for Mrs. Gandhi to lose a court case, to suffer a humiliating defeat in a general election and to see the inside of a prison cell. None of these even remotely suggest any feature of a dynastic rule. It’s not that you don’t know these and more, but when demagogy is the currency of the day, who cares for rhyme, or reason.

Parvez | 11 years ago | Reply

@Naveen: Now that and gp65's reply gave me a good picture of the squabbles that are going on in certain parts and to quite an extent are understandable because of the diversity involved. What is still not clear is the contention of the senior Indian journalist that there is a big and heavy handed Indian military presence in the NE states which is not really known to most everyday Indians...........I wish I could remember the gentleman's name but unfortunately I can't but he was completely white haired, round faced, dark complexioned and claimed to be one of the few very senior journalists around. @abhi.......nice of you to respond.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ