UPA vs PASC: The ruckus over Zinda Bhaag’s Oscar recommendation

Published: September 18, 2013
Email
Sharmeen Obaid (L) and Shahzad Nawaz (R). PHOTO: FILE

Sharmeen Obaid (L) and Shahzad Nawaz (R). PHOTO: FILE

KARACHI: 

Pakistani cinema might have made a comeback, but the politics are very much the same. Soon after the Pakistani Academy Selection Committee (PASC) recommended Zinda Bhaag to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for Oscar consideration in the Foreign Language Film category over Josh, Chambaili and Lamha, naysayers took to social media to share their reservations.

The opposition

The United Producers Association (UPA) — the body that earlier voiced concern over the airing of Turkish soaps — expressed its criticism via a press release on its Facebook page. The organisation, headed by film-maker Shahzad Nawaz whose Chambaili didn’t make the cut, has previously also questioned the formation of the PASC.

Dr Framji Minwalla, a member of the Oscar committee, explains why the film was selected over others. “Some people believe films dealing with urgent social issues should be ranked higher than others, no matter how badly [they are] made, and that exceptional films with no social value should receive little public attention, while others think the social relevance of a film has absolutely no place in the consideration of cinematic excellence,” he says. “A smarter approach assesses how well the technical, narrative, aesthetic and social aspects work together to show us the world anew.  In its own modest way, Zinda Bhaag has revealed a Pakistan we had not seen before and did so with technical surety, while also taking smart aesthetic and narrative risks.”

Framji adds, “To hurl questions at the integrity of the process because the work one prefers was not selected seems particularly arrogant, especially when those questions are designed to disqualify certain films from consideration. I have a question for Secretary General UPA Shahbaz Siddiqui: Do you want these films disqualified because your boss believes his submission [Chambaili] does not stand a chance when measured against a fair playing field? Instead of grandstanding, feeling victimised and getting other people to do his dirty work, perhaps the president of the UPA [Nawaz] should start planning to produce a better film next year.”

UPA argues

•  Why was the official last date of submission set for August 25 by the PASC, when the international deadline is September 30?

•  To be eligible for this year’s Academy Awards, films must have been released in Pakistan for a run of at least seven consecutive days beginning no earlier than October 1, 2012 and no later than September 30, 2013. With a scheduled release for September 20, how has it fulfilled these requirements?

•  Why could the committee not wait until September 30, the stipulated deadline for an entry’s release, to announce its decision to select the film?

•              Why has the press release been issued with a letterhead of Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy Films instead of the official Oscar Pakistan Committee when the forms available in Pakistan carried the Academy logo?

PASC hits back

•  The physical copy and related material of the selected film must reach the Academy by October 1, thus the local submission and selection process must happen well before that. The committee set forth the deadline of August 25 to ensure there was ample time for the committee to verify that all submissions were viable, circulate the films internally, cast their ballot, inform the winning party and dispatch the film to Los Angeles in time for the official Academy submission date.

•  All films released before September 30 were entertained for selection, which is why Lamha and Zinda Bhaag were not disqualified.

•  The rules set forth by the Academy state that the submitted film must be screened commercially for seven days in the country of release. Both Zinda Bhaag and Lamha are set to release this week, thereby fulfilling this requirement. Such practices are commonplace globally; the Indian film The Lunchbox for instance, is a forerunner for submission for the Academy Awards and is also set to be released on the September 20.  PASC had already received verification from the film-makers of both Lamha and Zinda Bhaag, thereby ensuring that the films would in fact release before September 20. Similar announcements were also made in national newspapers, by the said film-makers thereby further validating the announced release dates.

•  The committee preempted the announcement in order to ensure that the film-makers had enough time to compile and dispatch the material to Los Angeles in order to meet their international deadline. Over 30 countries have also made their decisions public before September 30 — it’s a normal practice that film-makers in Pakistan will get used to the more we continue to be a part of the film submission process.

•              Zinda Bhaag is permitted to publicly announce its official selection for Pakistan for 2013 — it was announced by PASC’s office through a press release to inform the country which film would be representing it.

————————————————————————————————————————————————

Do you think Zinda Bhaag deserved to be nominated for Oscar consideration?

     View Results


Polls are non-scientific, reflect only the online audience and can be manipulated.
 Loading ...

Published in The Express Tribune, September 19th, 2013.

Like Life & Style on Facebook, follow @ETLifeandStyle on Twitter for the latest in fashion, gossip and entertainment.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (14)

  • Deepwater
    Sep 18, 2013 - 9:10PM

    The Saudis need to get involved to sort this out.

    Recommend

  • Saqib
    Sep 19, 2013 - 7:02AM

    Anything good coming out of our country is always questioned by some people. It’s a first and we should all celebrate.

    Recommend

  • Cup
    Sep 19, 2013 - 12:16PM

    Makes complete sense! we should be proud of all our movies and try to send the most positive one forward to the international community.
    This seems more like a game of favouring the right connections.

    Utterly disappointing!

    Recommend

  • S
    Sep 19, 2013 - 1:41PM

    There is a point, any movie coming out on issues is very much preffered and given more publicity. And this is utterly dissapointing. The whole world promote movies that improve their image, our country is the only country which promotes movies that show out down side.

    Recommend

  • yellow
    Sep 19, 2013 - 1:55PM

    UPA has a right to have its concerns addressed!

    Recommend

  • choclet
    Sep 19, 2013 - 4:20PM

    how much pakistani is ZB? and how much technically indian?? to qualify as a (complete) ‘pakistani’ product?

    Recommend

  • tankerofkarachi
    Sep 19, 2013 - 5:18PM

    All said and done, I do know Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy well enough to know how much she likes to be in the public spotlight and fair enough, she did win the documentary for Pakistan but it seems she wants to spearhead all the Oscar glory Pakistan could potentially be entitled to for as long as she’s alive.Recommend

  • tayyaba rana
    Sep 19, 2013 - 6:17PM

    worst movie of the year wz chambaili. i wonder its maker considers it a movie.

    Recommend

  • Fatima Beneari
    Sep 19, 2013 - 8:03PM

    @tankerof Karachi You claim to know Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy but yet you post under a fake handler name are you afraid? So how can anyone accept your claim to know her well?

    Recommend

  • np
    Sep 19, 2013 - 8:36PM

    ET: Zinda Bhaag has not yet been released in Pakistan. On what basis do you expect readers to vote on whether it should have been the country’s Oscar submission.

    Recommend

  • gp65
    Sep 19, 2013 - 8:40PM

    ETBLOGS1987

    “Do you think Zinda Bhaag deserved to be nominated for Oscar consideration?”

    Wrong question. Pakistan can only submit a movie as an Oscr entry. The nomination process (selecting top 5 for the Oscar jury to to vote on) is entriely in the hands f the OScar committee.

    I have a question though. I thought this movie was only being released in Pakistan on September 20. So I wonder how people answered the survey without seeing the movie.

    Recommend

  • Faraz
    Sep 19, 2013 - 8:51PM

    What if Zinda Bhaag doesn’t make it to the 7th day? If it’s a total flop and is out of the box office on 6th day of release.

    Recommend

  • Padma Patel Mumbai
    Sep 20, 2013 - 3:34AM

    @faraz Trust me I saw it Pakistan should be very proud even though there was some Indian assistance the film, the subject, the locales Lahore is Pakistan its totally * Pakistani* Knowing that Pakistan film industry is in its growing stage, I think if released in India will surprise Indian audiences the film is a light comedy infused with catchy music marvelous acting and the Oscar voting bloc in Hollywood may be surprised that a film like this is made, as most foreign submitted films are great but yet serious and they will discover that In spite of all the security threats Pakistan was allowed to produce this gem. The only people I see who have an issue is the local Pakistani movie fans who have been mild supporters of their own talented movie makers, I don’t know the reason but I as an Indian see ugly traces of it that is the only obstacle that the makers of Zinda Baag need to fear.

    Recommend

  • Saima
    Sep 27, 2013 - 12:43AM

    I just saw the film. If anybody here has seen the film there should be no doubt in their minds why this film was chosen. This is the best film Pakistan has ever made. I had heard about this film but I did not expect to see such a wonderful film. Really.

    Recommend

More in Film