It’s not personal, it’s strictly business: Restaurants asked to pack up and move

Published: September 15, 2013
SHARES
Email
The affected restaurants - Sajjad, Charcoal, Creek Inn, H & Q Business (Kababees), Hot Bite, Ambala Corniche, Café Echoes and Olive Café - filed a set of petitions with the Sindh High Court, asking that the agreement with the DHA management should be treated as a lease, not as a licence. PHOTO: ATHAR KHAN/EXPRESS

The affected restaurants - Sajjad, Charcoal, Creek Inn, H & Q Business (Kababees), Hot Bite, Ambala Corniche, Café Echoes and Olive Café - filed a set of petitions with the Sindh High Court, asking that the agreement with the DHA management should be treated as a lease, not as a licence. PHOTO: ATHAR KHAN/EXPRESS

KARACHI: 

The restaurants stretched across almost 2.5 kilometres in Phase VIII of the Defence Housing Authority face the threat of being uprooted due to a notice issued by DHA authorities, asking them to shut down and vacate the premises.   

According to the restaurant owners, the notice was issued on March 22 without any reason or lawful justification. According to the court’s record, the second notice was sent on July 11 ordering the owners to vacate the land before August 15.

The affected restaurants – Sajjad, Charcoal, Creek Inn, H & Q Business (Kababees), Hot Bite, Ambala Corniche, Café Echoes and Olive Café – filed a set of petitions with the Sindh High Court, asking that the agreement with the DHA management should be treated as a lease, not as a licence.

On September 10, Justice Munib Akhtar of SHC granted an interim stay to the restaurant owners until the next hearing against vacating their premises and issued notices to the DHA management to appear before the court on a date yet to be decided.

The petitioners, represented by lawyers Farukh Zia Shaikh and Munir Ahmed Panhwar, told the court that they were given the indication that their contracts would be renewed after the two-year period was completed.

According to the petitions, the DHA allotted an open piece of 1,500 square yards to each restaurant through a written lease agreement on July 6, 2011, which was purported as a licence agreement. It also said that the monthly rent for setting up a restaurant at Beach Avenue was set at Rs100,000 for an initial period, starting from May 6, 2011 to April 30, 2012 with an increase in rent at the rate of 10 per cent per annum.

DHA’s version

A DHA official, on the condition of anonymity, told The Express Tribune that the notice was nothing out of the ordinary and was part of running a business. When asked about the reason for this notice, he said that the authority will elaborate in their official statements “when it was the right time and once everything was decided and final.” He also clarified that there was still possibility of the contracts being renewed.

Reservations

Association of Defence Resident’s general-secretary, Asad Kizilbash, told The Express Tribune that even if DHA had substantial reasons for taking this action, they should have held meetings and gotten residents’ approval. “Since DHA works as a commercial entity, it should involve the public more and think about people’s welfare rather than just profit,” he said, adding that the association could not act on its own and could only take action if they received a complaint.  “We can take the matter to court only if we are approached and the matter is genuine.”

Owners’ concerns

The restaurant owners allege that their multi-million investment, which is more than Rs6 million, will go down the drain and at least 3,000 employees will lose their jobs if the agreement is not renewed. The owner of the popular Sajjad Restaurant, Sajjad Dayo, stated that DHA officials had been unjust with them on various terms. According to him, the agreement was made in July 6, 2011, which was a long-term commitment and beneficial for both parties.

“The management made the agreement on two bases – to populate the place and create a recreational facility for the residents,” he said. “They used our business as a gamble to see whether the facility would work or not. And when it has, they now want to give the space to other people.”

He alleged that the DHA officials had promised to renew the project, lamenting that most of the owners had set up their businesses through personal investments.

Ambala’s CEO Adnan Ahmed also said that he was extremely disappointed in the way the management had dealt with the issue.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 15th, 2013.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (12)

  • confused
    Sep 15, 2013 - 2:01AM

    No more Kolachi :'(

    Recommend

  • aamir
    Sep 15, 2013 - 9:22AM

    Probably there is a change of Management,

    I recall the first restaurant near do daria was an investment made by some Col who worked for DHA.

    Maybe now he is gone, and DHA wants to “renew” these leases to mint money.

    Recommend

  • A J Khan
    Sep 15, 2013 - 10:30AM

    Utimately Bar & bench will make money

    Recommend

  • saad
    Sep 15, 2013 - 12:49PM

    so now DHA has joing the bhata mafia group so who will be next

    Recommend

  • GhostRider
    Sep 15, 2013 - 12:53PM

    “The restaurant owners allege that their multi-million investment, which is more than Rs6 million”
    I doubt this figure, i think it would be six billion

    Recommend

  • Jamil Naqsh
    Sep 15, 2013 - 2:48PM

    DHA involvement means the Forces involvement in it !!! meaning that they must be wanting to make more money after they must have seen that the restaurants are doing good business !! they must be blackmailing the restaurant owners now once again to increase rent or something !!

    Recommend

  • Rehan Baig
    Sep 15, 2013 - 3:52PM

    lol @ saad FYI bro they are the real bhatta mafia :) and land grabbers :)

    Recommend

  • Rehan Baig
    Sep 15, 2013 - 3:53PM

    lol @ Saad, they are well known bhata mafia already :)

    Recommend

  • Khan
    Sep 15, 2013 - 4:37PM

    @GhostRider:
    Or probably six gazillion, why not.

    Recommend

  • A Khan
    Sep 15, 2013 - 5:43PM

    3000 employees, seriously? They do not even employ a third of that.

    Recommend

  • Mohammad Ali Siddiqui
    Sep 16, 2013 - 12:23AM

    It is the fault of restaurant owners that they sign the agreements with DHA for a minimum period of contract.

    In case of lease, the restaurants owners should have signed for a minimum period of 20 years with an annual inflation of 10% increase in the rent.

    The problem is that DHA dictates its own terms in the contract and one is bound to signed the contract agreement in order to take the possession of the land to run the show.

    DHA has already raised the price on several counts in respect with the transfer of plots and DHA is minting money like any thing.

    Only court can provide relief to the complainants and no one else.

    Recommend

  • Umber
    Sep 17, 2013 - 11:41AM

    @GhostRider:
    Not 6 billion but around 500-600 million

    Recommend

More in Sindh