My annoyance with this hypocrisy is all the more because I agree with all that anti-imperialists are saying: who is the US to be big brother and worry about Syria? Why can’t the UN be made stronger and more autonomous for stuff like this? What about the use of conventional weapons that have killed far more than chemical weapons? What about the US’s own record of human rights around the world?
I hear you, but my ears have been feeling numbed by reading the phrase ‘Western hypocrisy’ day in and day out. For a change, tell me about eastern hypocrisy? But to talk about eastern hypocrisy would be Orientalist. What do you mean by eastern hypocrisy?
Eastern hypocrisy is when 25 leftist organisations in Delhi decide to protest outside the US embassy against the US’s “cynical adventurism” in Syria. To be held tomorrow (Saturday), the advance statement for the protest reads, “We join peace loving people from across the world in opposing war and calling for a just and peaceful resolution to the tragedy in Syria. We also demand that the government of India join with other southern countries in pressing for a political dialogue and immediate ceasefire in Syria.”
Hello, if you want a peaceful resolution and an immediate ceasefire in Syria, should you not be demonstrating outside the Syrian embassy? But how can Indian leftists protest against fellow easterners, the good jolly Arabs, victims of American hunger for oil. What is it about anti-imperialism that it makes sexier than all other causes, all other victimhood? I think one reason is our inability to think without binaries. Most people look for the good and the bad side in a conflict, when in truth, there are more than two sides and nobody is good. The methods of the Syrian rebels show us as much.
Internalising the binary of poor Syrians and predator Americans is to accept the terms and conditions laid down for us by George Bush Jr: you are either with us or against us. And so, a lot of people seem to have decided that they are either going to be Tariq Ali (who thinks the Taliban is a legit resistance movement) or Tarek Fatah (who sees nothing but jihad, jihad, jihad everywhere). Sorry, I refuse to go mad in either direction.
The problem with waking up to a civil war in Syria only when the US plans air strikes is that your noises about human rights and international law no longer have any credibility. You sound every bit as opportunist as the US. Perhaps, you are deliberately this opportunist about it, because your anti-imperialism is actually a cover for eastern hypocrisy.
A classic case of this is the strange problems some have with Malala Yousufzai. The anti-Malala ranting has come to be known as “Well played, Malala” after the title of one such rant. Even as Pakistani right-wingers were complaining about the West using Malala to cover its own sins such as drone strikes, a pedigreed peace-loving conservative who cycles around Delhi to spread love was asking, “Why didn’t Malala speak against occupation?” Well, maybe because her land is not occupied by the US and is in danger of Taliban occupation!
But precisely because you don’t want to hear bad things about the Taliban, you’d rather shift the focus away to ‘Western hypocrisy’. We will, of course, be told how the Taliban themselves are a creation of the West and how the US has supported despots of all kinds in its lust for oil.
I love it how we pretend we don’t have any agency, we are puppets and America makes our hands move in whatever direction it likes. Which might as well be true if you see our anti-imperialists.
I oppose US intervention in Syria but I won’t join my friends outside the US embassy tomorrow.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 6th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (22)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Lala Gee:
Eh? can you please enlighten us on the India-angle?
One of the savviest practitioners of this 'eastern hypocrisy' is the left-liberal-pseudo-secular brigade of South Asia. @Naveen will know.
@Author:
I am sure you must have heard about the "New World Order" and "The Clash of Civilizations". As these are the more recent developments, and hence most knowledgeable people know about them, what about the "Protocols Of The Elders of Zion"? Any reflections? Please don't tell me the current Syrian situation is merely a sectarian conflict between Saudis and Iranians. How come, Shia rule in Iraq is Okay for Saudis, but not in Syria? Also, try remembering the decade long deadly Iran Iraq war. I don't know about you, but the most informed people know who were actually behind the war, and who supplied the supplies to both. Look at what happened in Libya. The very same Al-Qaida, West is fighting all over the world, is installed there with the full military and financial support of the West. And now what happened in Egypt, and to the democracy the West invaded Iraq and Libya for. The simple reality is, with every commotion, infighting, and war, nations get weaker, and the foes get stronger automatically without doing much. Don't they? What an easy, risk free, safe, and cost effective way of keeping the enemy under control! By the way, don't you see any commonality in strategy India and her strategic partners are pursuing?
@Syeda Jafri: How true!
Protests and Sit-ins should be carried out in front of Saudi embassy. The worst monarchies in the world are Al-Saud family and Al-Khalifa Family.
The fact is it takes courage to accept your own mistakes & practically do something to correct them. Better criticise & blame others for what they do against you. We are all against US invasion, but seriously confused when asked what Al-Qaeda, Talibans & Saudi funded rebels are doing in Syria. We cant even identify what is our own problem, yet we often have perfect solutions to the problems that are not our own.
@Ali Tanoli: Sir, is there an " auto translate" program/software which can translate your comments into simple english?
And your point was?
@dillidurast I hear you mate! I went after him too that beloved of all 'cyclist' who berated Malala on twitter. Lost many 'learned' friends in the process who told me that i know nothing.
@Zalim singh: May be you have not been able to make sense out of it
Best analysis so far.
@DilliDurAst
so what? as long as you oppose american wanking, it matters
Demonstration should be outside iranian embassy and against the sellable world of hypo including india who is been sold itself for few billions many time and most recently for civilion energy????
Mate, I agree fully with you. The protesters would be better off protesting outside Syrian Embassy, their supporters - Russian and Chinese Embassies. On the other side of the war, they should also protest outside the Saudi and Qatari Embassies for supporting the Rebels.
100,000 dead and two years of brutal war - not one bullet fired by the West -- but don't we love protesting against the West!!
I think its very oft-repeated ,traditional critique of left forces.Who don't know all these things, call it "eastern hypocrisy" or whatever.It is very much easy to point out the hypocrisy of Leftists or Marxist,by giving the example of what they skipped or did not do(in this case demonstration outside the Syrian embassy).To some extent these critiques are valid, but investing this objective analysis to turn upside down the credibility of a mass protest against a very genuine and obvious injustice, which can lead to serious consequences, is grossly unfair and equating it western hypocrisy makes no sense and highly ridiculous.We all know, how the "western hypocrisy', full of vested political and economy interest, has almost been institutionalized and they have managed to justify their hypocrisy using media and global organisations and calling it "as opportunist as US" is beyond understanding..How can you equate invading a country killing thousand of people, with protest by 25 leftist organisations in Delhi outside the US embassy, which i think hardly will get even media coverage.Please rethink, you seems to have gone overboard in the comparative study of eastern and western hypocrisy.
"The problem with waking up to a civil war in Syria only when the US plans air strikes is that your noises about human rights and international law no longer have any credibility. You sound every bit as opportunist as the US." Shivam my friend, may you live a thousand years, for showing the mirror of hypocrisy to the East too.
America will do what is in its national interest, we better worry about our self interest- left or right.
Having said that, the Conflict in Syria (just like the protracted Iran-Iraq War with its massive use of Chemical Weapons) sends chill down my spine when I think of something similar happening in the Subcontinent. If we let our disputes fester on, the outside players will fish into the trouble. India, being a bigger player, needs to act rationally and generously here. Pakistan is no China- It is no hostile rival to India, it's more like contractor for hire to any global power that wishes to raze down India (and offcourse in process get Pakistan itself razed down). To the outside global power, It won't matter how many Indians and Pakistanis will die in the process. Tears will be ours to be wipe and Dead will be ours to bury. Reasonable people in power should take necessary steps to prevent such disaster from happening in future.
............ realistically the demonstration should be outside the Saudi and Iranian Embassy.
whole world is nutty child who cant solved there problems and comes to Mamoo america and mamoo is after all mamoo...
confusing article.
May be some of you demonstrate in front of Saudi Embassy as its Saudis who leading the entire game and Americans are doing only their bidding.