Aisam, Rojer qualify for third round of US Open

Fifth seeds beat Spanish opponents 6-2, 6-3 to progress.


Afp August 31, 2013
Aisam and Rojer qualify for the third round of the US Open after beating Roberto Bautista Agut and Daniel Gimeno-Traver 6-2, 6-3. PHOTO: FILE AFP

NEW YORK:


Pakistan’s Aisamul Haq Qureshi and his Dutch partner Jean-Julien Rojer qualified for the third round of the US Open after beating the team of Roberto Bautista Agut and Daniel Gimeno-Traver 6-2, 6-3 in the second round of the men’s doubles event yesterday.


The duo just took just one hour and seven minutes to dispatch their Spanish opponents, going on to win a total of 63 points, according to the official US Open website.

Murray survives first scare

Defending champion Andy Murray survived his first scare of the US Open, beating Argentina’s Leonardo Mayer, 7-5, 6-1, 3-6, 6-1 and going on to tackle Germany’s Florian Mayer for a last-16 spot.

“It was a very tough match,” said Murray. “I’m just glad I was able to put it together and pull it out in the fourth set.”

Meanwhile, world number one Novak Djokovic survived a first-set wobble to defeat Germany’s Benjamin Becker 7-6 (7/2), 6-2, 6-2. “Becker is a quality player and he should have won the first set,” said Djokovic, who next plays Portugal’s Joao Sousa. “I was fortunate to come out of it, but after that I felt more comfortable on the court.”

Australian Lleyton Hewitt battled to a five-set win over Argentine sixth-seed Juan Martin Del Potro. The 2001 champion defeated the 2009 winner, 6-4, 5-7, 3-6, 7-6 (7/2), 6-1 in the tournament’s biggest shock to date.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 1st, 2013.

Like Sports on Facebook, follow @ETribuneSports on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (1)

Khan Bhai | 10 years ago | Reply

Aisam is brilliant to watch and he has been in great form this year. I really hope he wins the US Open.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ