
What is certainly worth noting for us at home is that the changed opinion on Dr Afridi’s sentencing coincides with a federal cabinet decision to step up efforts to secure the repatriation of Dr Aafia Siddiqui, the Pakistani scientist convicted to an 86-year jail sentence on terrorism charges in the US, in 2010. At home, demands, notably from religious parties but also other groups, have continued to be voiced for Dr Siddiqui’s return. To help secure this, Pakistan is now set to sign a Council of Europe treaty. It is hard to believe we are seeing nothing more than pure coincidence. The US has for months shown an interest in Dr Shakil Afridi being handed over to it. Logic would suggest a trade-off between the two prisoners may have been planned. Otherwise, it is hard to see why a rethink on Dr Afridi’s sentence would come so many months after his conviction and it seems we are willing to play games of justice to achieve certain ends. This is, in more ways than one, unfortunate, even without going into the details of either case.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 31st, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ