The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Tuesday revoked the membership of Samad Mursaleen, one of the founding members of PTI’s Peshawar chapter who decided to contest the by-polls independently after being refused a party ticket for NA-1.
Mursaleen is standing as an independent candidate against PTI ticket holder Gul Bacha. He was earlier nominated president of PTI Peshawar and has also served as the provincial vice president of the party.
“PTI has cancelled the basic membership of Mursaleen for going against the party’s decision,” read a statement issued by PTI’s media cell, PTI Provincial General Secretary and K-P Health Minister Shaukat Yousafzai. “A show-cause notice was issued to Samad Mursaleen, but despite that he refused to withdraw his candidacy.”
A fresh notice was also issued to Mursaleen asking him to refrain from using the party’s name and flag for his election campaign. “Those who have betrayed the party and its leadership for the sake of a ticket cannot be its ideological workers,” Yousafzai said in the statement.
In contrast, banners and posters placed by the ‘ideological’ workers depict Imran next to Mursaleen and use the PTI’s flag. The confused campaigning has further perplexed PTI voters.
Internal rifts and allegations over violating merit in allotting by-election tickets may cost the PTI NA-1 Peshawar-I. The party won the constituency with an overwhelming majority on May 11, but now faces a curiously divided vote bank.
Even as Peshawar emerged as a PTI stronghold in the general elections after winning all of the city’s National Assembly seats, divisions were apparent soon after. Senior party leaders started objecting over the ticket allotment for the NA-1 by-polls.
Meet the candidate
After failing to reconcile their differences, a disgruntled group calling itself PTI Nazriati (ideological) formed in early 2012, fielded Samad Mursaleen.
“Someone has to take the initiative to expose opportunists in the party. Once I win the election, I will present the NA-1 seat to Imran Khan myself,” Mursaleen told The Express Tribune.
The candidate insisted he was still loyal to the PTI. “The whole city knows who has been victimized. I am the one who brought and strengthened the PTI in Peshawar and remained loyal to date. The people will vote for me.”
Apart from contesting elections from PK-2 on a PTI ticket in 1997, Mursaleen also wields influence among the community of traders and enjoys support of veteran PTI activists. Hence his move has the potential to divide the party’s vote bank further, handing advantage to Awami National Party (ANP) stalwart Ghulam Ahmad Bilour. Bilour is already backed by a three-party alliance – his own, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP).
“Mursaleen is an old friend but he will hardly get 2,000 votes. That’s why we asked him to withdraw in favour of his fellow party member several times, but he refused,” shared PTI provincial spokesperson MPA Ihtiaq Urmar. “PTI will win NA-1 constituency with an overwhelming majority just as we did previously,” he added.
Activists of PTI’s coalition partners Jamaat-e-Islami and Qaumi Watan Party are also enthusiastically campaigning for PTI candidate Gul Bacha, bringing PTI to the forefront in the NA-1 electoral race, argued Urmar.
Peaceful polling?
Unlike the general elections where the ANP and PPP failed to publicly campaign in the face of terrorism, ANP and PPP activists have been doing the door-to-door routine for the upcoming by-polls. While enjoying the support of Majlis Wahdatul Muslimeen (MWM) and Jamiat Ulema-e-Pakistan-Noorani (JUP-N), ANP and PPP have organised several public gatherings.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 21st, 2013.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
false news, this refers 2 my town i.e na1. rite candidate has got pti ticket. he is working 4 last 15 years in na1 4 pti. n i m a ANP voter.
@Informer: @MA:
Fake degrees, US dollars donations inquiry demanded by the very person who arranged it, IK came to Karachi and demanded the arrest of "killers" of Miss.Zahra, earlier clearly named "Altaf Hussain" to be responsible for murder (one single legal notice tamed this lion from roaring unnecessarily) , FG gave very loud and clear tips about DGK jail break, but shameless accomplice KPK government and brazenly forgetting their own demand to ANP to leave government on the same type of incident, neither IK nor his ministers bother to visit terrorists victims and funerals (cowards). these 70 days are saturated with failures rather than with achievements. frantic PTI supporters just ask people who voted PTI for a change how they are feeling now supporting PTI
Mursaleen will b back .. once a PTIites, always a PTIite
@Aysha M: coming from someone who endorses "MQM" as an honest and a progressive political party. give us a freakin break!!!....by the way why were your Rabita Committee members were trashed by its very "karkunaan"...oopss!!! i mean sacked by its off shore leader...didn't that put MQM in a self-destructive mode too ?
Naya pakistan can tolerate dissident ..like old pakistan must be royal to head of the party..in pakistani politics it is the money that count not the royalty...
@AS: Wishful dreams that never come true.
Now herein lies the difference between a political party which upholds solid democratic values and some pajama outfit adamant on calling itself an Ideological Political Party - Until recently, Anjum Aqeel was presenting himself as the defacto candidate of PML-N from NA-48 even though NS and PML-N had officially allocated the ticket to Ashraf Gujjar. The leadership led by Hamza and ISB Chapter sat with Anjum Aqeel and cajoled him to withdraw in favor of Gujjar and not create unnecessary rifts in the party at the grassroots level. At no point did the party or leadership threaten Aqeel with expulsion or revocation of his party membership.
PTI in a self-destructive mode
@Raza.....good point.....As for destroying image.....do you remember that PMLN MPA Nighat Nasir was kicked out for harassing and slapping a bus hostess. So showing the door does not mean destroying image....instead it means to remove black sheep's from parties. Hope you now understand.
@FACT: @AS: in that case PML-N and PPP are way ahead......
Classic dilemma of an emerging political party, ideological and hard workers do not necessarily make good leaders, or winning politicians. These workers should be given due credit within the party but they should will do more harm than good by standing in the polls. Likewise, winning candidates should be respectful of these workers as they owe them a great debt. . Get this balance right and PTI will have solved one of its biggest challenges.
I know Samad personally, he is not the type of person you want in power house, his brother kaki and him are profound power hungry people, and time and time again out is proved they can't win elections, check the bar association election in peshawar back in 90's. Good decision pti, he won't harm you. Instead gul is the guy we are proud of.. By the way does samad still drives that white mercedes.
I don't think PTI leadership knows the difference between "Ideological workers" and "slave labour". They are running the party like a dictatorship. Anyone who disagrees is kicked out. It does not matter what they did for the party. This attitude is enough to destroy PTI.
@Razi: no need bashing PTI itself enough to destroy its own image in so early time frame.
you only care for bashing....though, it wont make any difference. Because we support the PTI leadership's decision. And who does not agree, can stay out of PTI.
PTI bashers you have the floor.......let the bashing begin