He is also now clear that the war has to be fought regardless of how it might have started and what might be giving it fillip. Even more important, he now concedes that there are groups in Punjab that must be tackled just like their affiliates in other provinces.
But this is just the starting point. The terrain beyond this point is broken and undulating. Consider.
This war isn’t about to end. In fact, the world has entered a phase that will see perpetual conflict. While states realise the threat and are trying to regulate their responses, the conflict, because of emerging technologies and the ability of non-state actors (NSA) — groups and individuals — to challenge the states, will remain unregulated. The imperative of security will force the states to increasingly act like the NSAs (note how intelligence agencies are using hacking methods to counter threats). The existing legal structures are inadequate in dealing with the new kind of multidimensional war and by the looks of it — given technology and innovation — the laws will likely continue to trail behind the conflict curve.
In this backdrop, will Pakistan have to deal with its internal conflict as well as the fallout of the broader conflict. Globalisation is impacting conflict as much as it does the movement of money and goods. As Sohail Tajik put it aptly in a recent article in this space, NSAs, regardless of their agenda and motivation, have begun to share expertise and best practices. We will see more of that.
The states will make physical travel increasingly difficult, especially from and to countries of concern. But that problem will be circumvented by the internet and other communication technologies. Those technologies are equal opportunity benefiters and offenders, depending on where one stands.
The task of Khan is, therefore, not going to be an easy one. Firstly, because he is not the sole authority in the security domain. The army and its intelligence apparatus remain the elephant in the room. Khan will have to get a grip on at least those aspects of internal security that deal with his ministry. He will also have the unenviable task of changing mindsets. Even the army, which is decidedly the most disciplined force, is still largely stuck in old ideas of fighting. While it has taken tactical steps to adapt troops to fighting a low-intensity conflict, its strategic paradigm remains unchanged.
That being the case, it is easy to imagine where the police and paramilitary forces stand. The kind of discipline, training and equipment the police require is simply not there. This means that even after a policy is formulated, the implementation will throw up its own problems. And they won’t be easy to tackle.
Because the war is unregulated and thrives on innovation, force structures and responses will have to be flexible, not rigid. This is an old lesson of warfare. Hannibal defeated the Roman armies at Trebia, Lake Trasimene and then Cannae because the inflexible phalanx formation was totally unsuited to Hannibal’s fast-paced manoeuvres on the battlefield. The Neapolitans were unpleasantly surprised by Charles VIII’s canons; the French by the English longbows. The list is long.
The point about fighting any war, regardless of its nature is that victory demands innovating and staying ahead of the enemy. This is a constant. So far, we have trailed behind. Greater force against an elusive enemy is often a disadvantage. We need smaller, quick-reaction, highly-trained police units to deal with urban situations. But while we have been emphasising field operations, nary a thought been given to the role of analysts and communication and forensic experts.
Trained field operatives are important; they are the ones in the line of fire. But if we want to stay ahead of the enemy, it’s the analysts and communication and forensic experts that provide the field operatives their targets and ensure their success.
The current police force is totally unsuited to any role. It cannot even perform normal policing functions, let alone handle complex vertical and lateral CT operations. Moreover, the interior minister will be required to work within the constitutional framework which puts policing squarely in the provincial domain. His task will demand creating a federal force as well as inducing the provinces to improve their police forces. The current system of two cadres, the police service of Pakistan and a provincial one is not going to work.
Similarly, recruiting semi-literate personnel and not instituting specialised units in the police might have worked 50 years ago, they won’t now. The idea that semi-literate personnel can be any use in highly-specialised job environments is a mistake we cannot afford when it comes to security. This means that the abominable practice of police recruitments and postings at the pleasure of sitting MNAs and MPAs will have to be discontinued immediately. Politicians have no damn business deciding the functioning of the police. But, let it be stated clearly, that this will be possible only when political parties stop putting their faith in traditional clans who have created their satrapies.
Not easy to do given the nature of constituency politics in Pakistan. A good example is Sanaullah Zehri in Balochistan. He is doing everything possible to frustrate the larger objective of his party chief because his primary aim is to retain control of the PML-N in Balochistan. As for his approach to rules, the incident outside Balochistan Assembly is a good insight into it.
Khan will be up against various vested interests within his party and without that have created the structures that leave little room for agency. It will be a tough call, made tougher by a multitude of restraining factors. But Khan opted for the Daedalian wings when he chose his ministry. Now he has to manage the flight. If he flies too low, the feathers will soak; too high and the wax will come off. Welcome to a wicked problem.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 14th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (17)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
While I agree with some commenters that we must not create new institutions for the sake of creating them, it is still important to reshuffle the bureaucratic structure of our counter-terrorism apparatus for gains in response time, data mining/research and general cohesion. The police, of course, need to be better trained, better equipped and better paid. But the leaders also need to make themselves (and their families, and third cousins) accountable to such a force. The PM's son must also fear a speeding ticket or murder FIR as much as a poor citizen. In short, the police needs to be de-politicized.
All those guys hating on the fanciness of the writer, why don't you guys come up with some better solutions and recommendations yourself?
@Arifq: {If Pakistan as a federation is to beat this scourge then Punjab must take the lead} Bulls Eye. Needs no further elaboration.
This author is ditto like our Manish Tewari ...LOL All gobble de goo for people who really want to know whats the problem.. and a diplomat who does not want to answer the real question ...
It is shocking that the author is bogged down in fanciful strategies without so much as addressing the root of the problem that fuels extremism and militancy. The Constitution of Pakistan resembles a Religious Treatise rather than a document of Law. It is full of contradictions which make every legal ruling controversial and debatable, depending on interpretation. Secondly, even the implementation of Law is subject to whims and fancies of those tasked to carry out the task. The Education curriculum glorifies the achievements of one religion which is fine if it were not to demonize others. A lot of the extremism is caused by preaching of a very deviant form of religion glorifying violence and based on hate of other countries, denominations and faiths. No measure has been adopted since independence to ban the recruitment by terror networks or terror training camps, the State turning a blind eye if not providing outright encouragement to the practice. The State has also tacitly handed over control over large areas of its geography to non State actors without Parliamentary approval. If that was not bad enough it has shown no desire to reclaim territory and has stopped the Media from visiting there. Lastly, the State has refused to accept responsibility for its failed policies making reformation and course correction impossible. The Author has not only failed to diagnose the problem but indulged in meaningless kite flying using language and hyperbole, naturally this diatribe will add to confusion not clear the cobwebs.
you say the enemy is one step ahead of us. well that's quite obvious because the enemy has been fighting this war for the last thirty years. how many of our policy makers have fought a war. close to Zero i believe. you call the army and intelligence agencies the elephant in the room but i believe this is one situation where if you leave it completely to the civilians we are doomed. our political institutions call for dialogue to end this conflict because if they insist on war and someone asks them how are we gonna win this war, they have absolutely no idea.
And while at it. Annul treaties and alliance with US too. The real enemy of PK. then I have no problem fighting with terrorists...
Every time we are confronted with a problem we find the solution in making new organizations with buildings staff, big and small bosses with heavy pays and perks, huge funds at their disposal,big Japanese shining vehicles with obedient and smart drivers waiting and so on. Earthquake...ERRA...results after 8 years...still awaited funds eaten up no one knows. Electricity....NEPRA...their performance...fixing tariffs...funds eaten...no one knows. Media....PEMRA....performance....???....funds eaten....no one knows. OGRA...???...??? and along long list. On political side...Nazims... performance vis a vis funds eaten... miserable. Various committees in parliament and senate(Pakistan can comfortably run without these politically bribed senators)..then various commissions. Now, a counter terror organization. This all reminds of the famous story,"Emperor's New Clothes" where the emperor finally stripped off and rode through streets being idiot..
@Mirza: We lost last 5 years and more before that, but we are yet to reform our LEAs to tackle the menace of terrorism and PPP govt has done more damage in respect of controlling terrorism than all govt put together....where are those bomb detection and vehicle mounted Xray scanning equipments that was imported with so much fanfare from China by our ex MOI Mr R Malik ? Not one has been able to recoup its value in terms of detecting one case.
It is about time we should train and equip the police force. Police is the first responder but they are paid peanuts with not much training or equipment. Give police even 5% of the army budget and perks and see their performance. In most countries of the world police officers are paid lot more than corresponding army officials unlike Pakistan. For example in the US an average cop makes about $100,000/year with lots of perks. It is this safety, security and honor that makes them feel like respectable members of society and they do not hesitate to write a ticket to even governor of the state. It is about time we reform police and enter 20th century if not 21st! There is a saying you get what you pay for. With the meager income if the cops would not pick up onion, potato or apple from the kiosk then what are the other options? Why the highly paid govt servants do not do that? If one calculates then it would become evident that police has taken more casualties at the hands of terrorists than any other institution.
Romans didn't deploy the phalanx against Hannibal ever. Romans didn't lose because of rigid tactical formations. Romans were the pioneers of deploying flexible formations. Phalanx formation was permanently abandoned after the destruction of Greek phalanx at the hands of Roman legions at the battle of Cynoscephalae. And failure of adopt new tactics, weapons, techniques and procedures is entirely different from getting tactically outmaneuvered in the battlefield, so examples of Cannae etc. are all false. Example of Charles is also false as only powerful monarchs had the money and enjoyed technological monopoly over construction of large siege cannons.
A Punjabi Prime Minister who has the Punjab provincial assembly behind him is the only entity that can solve our militancy problem. It is Punjab silence and in many cases tacit to open support of the Jihadi nexus that has kept this war against Pakistan alive. If Pakistan as a federation is to beat this scourge then Punjab must take the lead. We all know what happened to PPP and ANP!
PML N must fail so that we can prove that Sharif brothers are incompetent and are only vote buyers! The whole country is rooting for them to fail just to prove a point, in the mean time people continue to die. In what is now an extremely polarised political environment, with one eye on what the judges say, and one eye on media anchors going on on a tangent, the PMLN despite their heavy mandate want to get as much support as possible, and do not want to spend political capital on making tough decisions. The Army of course remains the elephant in the room. Things need to be reduced to their simplest.
Pakistanis citizens are dying, the Pakistani state needs to provide justice to the victims and provide security. Thats it. The reasoning or rationalising of all this violence must end!
The scope and complexity of the problems facing by the interior ministry in Pakistan is way way beyond the capacity of Ch Nisar or Sharif brothers. It is too insane to expect from them to bring about any strategy to improve the situation. More than any one else , Taliban know this fact and they are doing every thing to bring down our morale to rock bottom.
Need some good analysis and recommendations mate, not lots of fancy words!