In Khan’s shadow: Adjournment motion planned against Imran’s participation in govt meetings

ANP finds Imran Khan’s attendance in administrative affairs ‘unethical’.

Hassan Ali August 04, 2013
Babak claimed the PTI leadership refrains from openly condemning terrorists and talking against terrorism. PHOTO: TMN

PESHAWAR: Deeming it “unethical”, the Awami National Party (ANP) will submit an adjournment motion against the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan for participating in provincial government meetings.

“On Monday (today) I will submit the adjournment motion at the Assembly Secretariat. We want to know in what capacity Imran Khan presides and participates in the provincial cabinet’s official meetings and meets with the department secretaries,” said ANP parliamentary leader Sardar Hussain Babak.

Opposition parties, including the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) and Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), will also support the adjournment motion. They too believe it is unethical for a party’s president to preside in government meetings, added Babak.

“We do respect him (Imran Khan) as a political party leader but there were political parties in the past who governed the province – their central leaders did not interfere in administrative affairs. They (PTI) have made a mockery of the system.”

Babak claimed the PTI leadership refrains from openly condemning terrorists and talking against terrorism, the main issue which Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa faces. The party has diverted the people’s attention to less important issues, maintained the ANP parliamentary leader.

“They (PTI) are confused. They don’t even know how to govern a province. Now they are inducting PTI members who lost the elections into working groups across government departments.” The ANP will soon issue a white paper which will highlight the PTI’s performance and bad governance, added Babak.

Commenting on the ANP’s campaign for the by-polls – NA-1 Peshawar and NA-5 Nowshera in particular – Babak claimed the party has the people’s mandate and will defeat PTI candidates in these constituencies.

He accused the PTI of using the government machinery to influence the electoral results in their favor in Nowshera, Swabi and Mardan. “Chief Minister Pervez Khattak is influencing by-polls in Nowshera where his son-in-law Imran Khattak is contesting, while K-P Assembly Speaker Asad Qaiser is announcing developmental projects in Swabi where his younger brother Aqibullah is contesting.”

PTI provincial information secretary and MPA Ishtiaq Urmar refuted the ANP’s allegations, calling them “baseless”.

“Imran Khan has participated in the meetings, but did not chair them. Even an ordinary man can participate in these government meetings, let alone Imran Khan,” said Umrar. He claimed the ANP failed to deliver in its tenure and since the PTI government is planning to reform every government department, the opposition parties are afraid they will lose their “corrupt sources”.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 5th, 2013.


Abid P. Khan | 10 years ago | Reply

@Equality: ".....I still remember a photo from President Zardari’s trip to the USA where a top level meeting in the White House with Obama had Bilawal Zardari sitting next to his father. " . The presence of Bilawal in Obama's White House was some how not made an issue in the US news media. They are used to even Clinton smoking cigars in the Oval Office with some young lady. We are not talking about the US territory. In this country we have different rules. . The courts should decide whether IK has a right to be there or he has been in violating rules and regulations, which should not be allowed in future.

Mirza | 10 years ago | Reply

Offical meetings of Govt should not be dictated by politicians no matter who is the culprit. If the past govt did this it was wrong and that is why they are history. If the current govt does the same for which they maligned the past govt then they sure are going to be history. Let us do something for public and stop terrorism rather than making excuses.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ