5th ODI: A welcome win for Pakistan

Tourists scramble to four-wicket victory over West Indies; clinch series 3-1.

Afp July 25, 2013
The victory was a much-needed boost for Pakistan after a disappointing run in the Champions Trophy. PHOTO: WICB


Pakistan scrambled to a four-wicket victory off the penultimate ball in the fifth and final One-Day International (ODI) against the West Indies at the Beausejour Stadium.

Replying to the hosts’ total of 242 for seven, captain Misbahul Haq’s innings of 63 again piloted the visitors to their target, although they made heavy weather of it at the end, Kieron Pollard missing the stumps at the non-striker’s end and Saeed Ajmal dashing home for the winning run to the relief of his teammates.

Pakistan take the five-match series 3-1 with one tied and now both teams shift focus to the two Twenty20s to be played tomorrow and on Sunday in St Vincent.

Misbah, who was dismissed at the start of the final over with the scores level, took both the man-of-the-match and the man-of-the-series awards.

Not for the first time over the five matches, the fate of the match hinged on his contribution with the bat.

But from the West Indies standpoint, they were left to lament a controversial moment when they were convinced that the Pakistani captain was caught off the glove by stand-in wicketkeeper Lendl Simmons off a fiery Tino Best.

On 49 at the time, and with the score standing at 190 for four in the 43rd over, his dismissal then with 53 runs still needed could have been pivotal.

Umpire Paul Reiffel’s not out decision was challenged by West Indies captain Dwayne Bravo but the Decision Review System (DRS) upheld the on-field verdict, much to the dismay of the Caribbean players on the field.

“A key decision went against us and that was the turning point in the game,” said Bravo. “I don’t think 3-1 for Pakistan was a fair reflection of the balance of power in the series.”

Shehzad, Akmal chip in

Ahmed Shehzad contributed a top score of 64 at the top of the order, but after being becalmed in the middle of the innings by some determined bowling from the West Indies, Misbah found an able ally in Umar Akmal, the same pair who had taken Pakistan to victory in the rain-shortened fourth match three days earlier.

They put on 66 for the fifth wicket and tilted the balance of the match decisively Pakistan’s way, only for Akmal to fall to a persevering Best for 37 just as an unexpected light shower swept across the ground.

A washout at that stage with the score at 226 for five off 47.4 overs would have given the tourists victory anyway for they were ahead on the Duckworth/Lewis method.

However, the skies cleared and when they resumed after 20 minutes, Pakistan just managed to get across the line despite Misbah’s dismissal, the key blow being delivered by Shahid Afridi when he hoisted Bravo over square-leg for six in the penultimate over.

“We really wanted this victory to finish the series off strong after all the disappointments earlier this year,” reflected a delighted Misbah.

“It was the bowlers who kept us in these matches throughout. That really is our strength.”

Junaid Khan and Mohammad Irfan shared five wickets in underlining their excellent performances during the series.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 26th, 2013.

Like Sports on Facebook, follow @ETribuneSports on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.


Blithe | 10 years ago | Reply

Good job Misbah and Co!

Good to see Umer Akmal with a better attitude, the Giant Irfan , Junaid , Harris Sohail , etc .

Cricket | 10 years ago | Reply

@Zamzam and Voice: You wish. And I wish you could have seen the last two overs especially the body language of the senior duo which was not reflecting anything but good understanding between the two. When Misbah got out, he communicated with Afridi about the situation, before leaving the ground. On the other hand Afridi talked to Ajmal on every ball and was giving him directions how to play the ball for the last run.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ