The Pakistani university was based on the colonial model meant to educate Indians to become junior partners in the business of running the empire. This meant that the function of the Indian university was to teach — disseminate existing research — and not to create new knowledge. The Indian academics were not supposed to be great scientists or scholars, they were meant to be lecturers; i.e., teachers at the college level. The greatest brain drain upon the colonial university was the colonial civil service, which attracted the best brains thus making them supporters of the establishment forever. The colonial university was also under-funded since most of the money had to go to support profits to be sent home or for the army and the civil service. So, what we inherited in 1947 were teaching universities and that, too, of an inferior kind.
Meanwhile, what happened to the university in Germany? Here, Wilhelm von Humboldt convinced the rulers to establish the research university. This was based upon the ideas of Friedrich Schleiermacher, who believed in academic freedom and research by students and faculty. Here, the professor was given much social prestige and also a decent living, which attracted intellectuals. Professorial chairs were given to outstanding scholars, who had published in their field. Even now, one becomes a professor in the German system by first completing his or her doctorate and then habilitation — something like a second doctorate — and even so, not everyone actually gets a chair. But once you do get it, you have both prestige and money. You control a department, determine what kind of research projects will be funded, hire people as your assistants and so on. You are given a lot of autonomy and you cannot be removed from your post unless you commit some grave criminal offence. Professors decide their timings of work though they do take courses and more than their counterparts in some of the best British and American universities (about nine hours than six hours a week in the best Anglo-Saxon universities). This is the beginning of the research university, which is why historians of higher education have quipped that “the dons of Oxford and Cambridge were keeping school while Germany had universities”. The German professor was not a teacher; he was a specialist — a producer of ideas, not merely the disseminator of the ideas of others. But, of course, he did lecture and he supervised research. So, can we establish research universities in Pakistan? I think we can and we should, while allowing our present universities to keep functioning as “teaching universities” and our colleges, which gain university status as “university colleges”.
I am sure we have enough highly published scholars and scientists to create one university. This university should have every subject under the sun and it should be so funded by the state that student fees should not matter. Its faculties may be the hard sciences, the applied sciences, the social sciences and arts and humanities. And within these four faculties, we can have every subject imaginable. As for the academics, we can attract the best minds by giving upscale market salaries, autonomy, academic freedom, prestige, research grants, sabbatical leave and a very easy workload (not more than six hours a week but reducible to three). Moreover, choice of time of work and no compulsory daily attendance, as are normal in many universities for professors, should be guaranteed to the whole faculty. Faculty should be evaluated by their research production, citations to their work, papers in conferences and so on. They need not be evaluated for their lectures by their students if they do not so desire, nor by anybody else, since that may reduce their prestige. However, research would be rigorously evaluated. The research university should be independent, choosing its own curricula and method of evaluation.
Below the research university should be the ordinary teaching university. Our present-day universities all come in this category. These need to follow the rules set from time to time by the Higher Education Commission (HEC), which needs to have control over their standards. The faculty need not be paid as high as the research universities but the present salaries need not be reduced. Their promotion should be dependent on some research but also on evaluation by students or peers as they desire. Lowest in the hierarchy are the university colleges, which is the status of places called “universities” on political demand in small cities. These should be completely in control of the HEC, which may set up a board to conduct examinations since these institutions sometimes do not even teach the basics of a subject but give the degree in it anyway. The faculty need not be paid salaries higher than they are at present under the BPS system. No research should be required for promotion but student and peer-group evaluation of teaching is necessary.
If we establish research universities, we will not spread the taxpayers’ money too thin, while ensuring that our best minds are attracted to research and the academic life.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 22nd, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (23)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Dear Professor Rehman,
You have been part of one of the prestigious universities of Pakistan for 30 years. Quaid-i-Azam University has the tradition of training youth in different disciplines.
You were among those few people who NEVER trained a single student in their subject.
It is very easy to criticize others/state, demand idealism but very difficult to work for the betterment in the existing environment. Stay Blessed.
Pakistani professors hardly know what they are talking about. Now and then they reinvent already tried ovrrated grand utopian ideals of "creation of knowledge" in this and that field. Let us now first analyse the results of similar Attaur Rehman experiment before we are lured again into Tariq Rehman experiment. And by this analysis I do not mean poewer point presentations telling "tokyo has this many unis, Pakistan has this many, an India has so much publications, Pakistan has that much, before year xxxx we had this many PhDs and now we have blah blah ..." Let us be honest: after 12 years of Musharaf/Atta experiment and billions of spending where Pakistan really stands among intnational scientific community?
If Prof Tariq Rehman is given the chance to implement his ideas, I promise you this: within years we are going to have another giant bureacratic proliferation, and money gulping white elephant.
What a wind of fresh air an outside observer feels, after reading this article. Sir, your name should be inscripted as the pioneer of the idea for the new age in Pakistan education. Nawaz Sharif Government should take heed and follow through. Pakistan eucaion system requires total reforms, but what the author has provided his commentry taking Hidelberg as the model sample, which is the creme ala cream of the elitest Europeaan universities, could be just te beginning for the Nation. Let us not dilute education with politics, a university achieves the elite status as soon as it has sufficent funds for research work and to attract the best Professors specialists in individual disciplines.
Bettina Robotka, it matters not whether the research work is carried out in the same campus where the standard higher studies take place or in a separate University. The author is proposing that without the research facilities there cannot be the education of the people in Pakistan who are confine to the low quality teaching of the anglo saxons which then encourage the students to go to the anglo saxon countries for further studies. Here is an example, there is a professor of physics in a Pakistan university, but throughout his teaching he has not managed to beome the doctor father of a single student in his care; this is not acceptable in German education system.
Rex Minor
What i wounder is that at he time of struggle for Pakistan. Sir Syed and its colleague were foreign studied students, likewise, Quaid-e-Azam, Allam Iqbal so on. While on the other hand, we have division in our education policy of spreading religious to scientific. In addition, clearly our policy of adoption of following rather creating. Therefore, in the initial foundation building of Pakistan we have not rephrase our policy rather we pinch it toward following British, American etc system. Here we may probability inculpate these to our ancestor but what we have done now. Inversely, feeling to copy past a literature review for research is not the case of research-re mean again, search mean seek. So, are institution are not even clearly identify with the fact that the are follow the same pattern. Research is what our university infrastructure may not be able to adopt. It is because the follower can't be a creator.
@Bettina Robotka: Good points! Thank you for that perspective.
@Shamsuddin: First of all religion has very little part in this debate; certainly not a central one. You can study theology if you want to, no one stops you. But tell me, if your religion is true, why are you so afraid that it can't stand a little inquiry. You really need to ask yourself what you are so scared of. Are you really a believer or is there some little doubt somewhere that scares you so? Why do you want to stop everyone from thinking for themselves? Are you afraid that the belief system you have made your life (probably with little examination) might not stand the light of day and destroy the whole foundation that you have built your life on (at least the public part of it). Really didn't want to bring religion here but since you did, let's talk about it, especially since I know this will be the biggest problem Pakistan will face while trying to create a culture of openness of thought and inquiry.
@Shamsuddin: sir knowledge Ijaz nothing to do with secularism or religion.
Research universities are successful only in an environment where a no academic question asked is considered heretical, and the right of academics to ask such questions and to research their answers is not considered in question by the general population and the government. A country where the murderer of a politician asking questions about a blasphemy law is garlanded by lawyers and praised by most public voices, while the politician's name is hardly ever again mentioned by the powers that be, such a country is hardly the place where a research university can be successful.
The trend in the West has already demonstrated that the more you research, no matter what you research (whether physics, biology, chemistry, math, social sciences, etc), the harder it becomes to maintain religious faith because the answers generally point away from divine creation and maintenance of this world. It is the result of such research that ultimately most westerners of faith have moved away from literal interpretations of their founding religious books. That would hardly work in a country like Pakistan where our education system has transformed from serving the interests of the imperial power to those of the mullahs.
I recently joined a public university, and i think with that i made the worst mistake of my life. This so-called up scale university is like a glossy prison both literally and figuratively.
@Bettina Robotka: I couldn't agree with you more. The author is misplaced in his recommendations. Also, he is completely mistaken in his assertion that all "we inherited in 1947 were teaching universities and that, too, of an inferior kind." We inherited some very fine institutions and preceded to ruin them. Just look up the Wikipedia entry on Satyendra Nath Bose (the second half of Higgs-Boson) to find out the level of research that was taking place at the Universities of Calcutta and Dacca well before 1947. It will be a monumental shock to most readers. Even the Government College Lahore of 1947 was much superior to what it is today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SatyendraNathBose
And finally, one doesn't do research in a vacuum or just to publish and get promoted. Is there any demand for research in Pakistan? The problem in Pakistan is not absence of knowledge. It is implementing the knowledge that is freely available. How much research does it require to provide clean water, health, education and security to people?
Sir, please don't mind if I add two comments on your idea of establishing a research university in Pakistan.
The center piece of the old Humboldt ideal of higher education was exactly the unity of teaching and research. All professors had to be researchers AND teachers. You are proposing a division in higher education : a first class university with such a unity and a second class without research or only secondary research. That would produce a majority of students who have finished higher education without the experience of how research is done and without access to the leading research people and ideas while only a minority from that elite university would have that experience. I don't think its a good idea. What more, what is the use of a professor who is interested only in research because that is what counts for his carrier and prestige and who does not care about teaching? Who doesn't try hard to pass on and explain the ideas to students which he is developing in his research? Both research and teaching have to go hand in hand! In all universities, even in those of applied sciences! For that the teaching load and the publishing load have to be balanced, stupid rules of presence in office and others have to be relaxed. But a university is always a teaching place and teaching should be of good and decisive quality. You have other research institutes where you may concentrate on research only without any students or some PhD students only.
Unfortunately I have to tell you that Germany has given up the Humboldt model in the course of European unification and the Bologna process where with bachelor and Master anglophile ideas have been introduced. That is the tide of the time where students are encouraged to get a certificate of higher education in a minimum time which also means they think about GPA more than about acquiring knowledge. This is what is going on Germany as much as in Pakistan.
@Irum: and Shahid Mian are absolutely right. One does not have to look too far. Abdus Salam was one of the greatest scientific minds produced in this region. Look what has happened with him. He is disowned by Pakistan but owned by all the rest of the world. Higgs Boson's discovery reminded us of his greatness and the pride he again brought to this poor country of ours - poor indeed both scientifically and literally. The glory is all lost due to the hindrances to freedom of thought and conscience in our country. No model can work without a good model for the society first.
Al-Azhar University in Cairo is good for us to follow not a German-style university which spreads secular atheistic teachings. The curriculum for every subject should be taught to respect the Koran not like Western universities where it is criticized.
@Shahid Mian PhD:
very true
Such a university already exists in Pak with the name of Quaid e Azam University, Islamabad. However, given the lack of interaction between the industry and university, this so called research university slowly degenerated into a taught university. Recently, QAU started offering undergrad courses.
State sponsoring of such university is likely to leave it at the mercy of the changing governments. What is required is a public-private partnership with private individuals taken the lead. The high caliber professors of such university should be able to generate their funding from the industry through their research. An interaction between research institutions and public and private organizations that need research is required.
In the early twentieth century Germany had the world leading universities. It was time of great intellectual ferment. And Germany was the epicenter of this explosion. Iqbal was in Heidelberg during this time. Yet you would have to look very hard to find the influence of Einstein or Freud or Darwin or Weber in his work. So here we have a 'stellar' muslim thinker from the subcontinent strangely silent to these epoch changing intellectual developments happening around him. If we are not creating new knowledge there is a deeper reason than just the system of universities.
@Shahid Mian PhD: Absolutely agree with you. As long as we are not successful in establishing a culture of intellectual freedom and curiosity, there will be no research culture. This is especially true of social sciences but generally for all subjects because openness to new ideas and ability to question norms is a necessary pre-requisite for good research. Sadly the Mullah brigade will soon put a stop to that. But such an institution will be a good start for initiating a culture of free enquiry, even if some hurdles are faced in the beginning.
Yes please create a university like Heidelberg and give the scholars academic freedom. In the middle ages universities like Heidelberg were able publish their dissent in obscure journals only read by scholars. With the internet this is no longer true. Dear Professor the moment the scholars exercise their academic freedom the people of this land will be outraged and scream to slit the throats of these scholars.
@Nadir:
In Pakistan leg puling is at its peak and HEC is no exception.Fact of the matter is one finds hardly any handworker who knows what he/she is doing and this is the failure of HEC
ET (Aldstadt) It should be writen as Altstadt
Research in academia is nothing to fool people by doing nothing but showing people what they already know by graphs and big words.
Instead of promoting fake research, Pakistan should promote industry and industry based research.
HEC Is a strategic asset and a disciplined institution. No criticism is acceptable.