Knowingly or unknowingly, Pakistanis are big believers in what is dubbed as the “phoenix effect” in popular culture. In Greek mythology, a phoenix is a bird that is cyclically regenerated or reborn. Associated with the sun, a phoenix obtains new life by arising from the ashes of its predecessor. Recently, the electrifying rallying cry of a naya Pakistan, rising from the ashes of the old Pakistan, is a sign of how deeply entrenched the “phoenix effect” mentality is in Pakistani society.
In many ways, this is classic Pakistani escapism playing its usual tricks. The romanticism of a magic cure-all for our problems is seductive in its simplicity and speed. Most critics of classic Pakistani escapism argue that the phoenix effect is hogwash and part of our favourite national pastime that involves burying our heads in the sand to deny our problems as the world moves on to bigger and better things. But what if the truth lies somewhere in the middle of the two extremes, i.e., blind faith in the phoenix effect and a complete denial of the phoenix effect?
What if a quick turnaround of fortunes for Pakistan is possible but we’re looking in all the wrong places for solutions to our problems? What if we were to reimagine the phoenix effect, not as a function of hope in a magic cure-all solution (think political tsunamis, running cars on water, etc.), but as an action plan that is firmly rooted in ground realities and seeks to genuinely solve our problems rather than simply hoping for the best?
After all, Pakistan is experiencing somewhat of a phoenix effect as we speak when it comes to the strength of democracy in the country. Look across the Muslim world and you’ll find that Pakistan is increasingly one of the more stable democracies. Take the events in Egypt or even Turkey recently where people’s power on the street threatens, or in some cases, even topples elected governments (in the case of Egypt, with the help of the military). In sharp contradistinction to the struggles of the Arab Spring, the Pakistani people reasserted their rights to elect and fire political leaders in the country on May 11, 2013, giving birth to a “new” Pakistani democratic culture that has risen from the ashes of the “old” democratic culture. This is nothing short of phenomenal even as we under-celebrate the long-term dividends of this institution building on account of the lack of tangible results they produce in the short run.
How did Pakistan turn around its hapless democracy? The first enabler was a broad-based consensus across civil society, as well as institutions, such as the judiciary and the press that democracy needs to be given a genuine, sustained chance in Pakistan. Second, political actors sacrificed their own short-term self-interest for the sake of long-term democratic stability in the country. This is uncharacteristic of politicians from anywhere in the world but is especially true in the case of Pakistan. Taking painful hits in the short term for long-term institution building is a sign of political maturity, even if most of us currently dismiss such sacrifices on account of the little impact they make in our “real” day-to-day lives.
As a country, we can reapply these principles to resolve the key national crises on energy, the economy as well as extremism. But there is another key enabler to resolving these issues in addition to broad-based political consensus and short-term sacrifices. If the countries of the world behaved like children in a high school lunchroom, Pakistan would be the misunderstood kid who sits in the corner and eats his lunch alone.
A deep-rooted mistrust of the outside world, particularly Western countries, has disproportionately influenced Pakistan’s public policy choices, resulting in suboptimal relations with other nations. It’s unhealthy for us to believe that there is an international conspiracy in which everyone in the world is out there to get us into trouble.
In the final analysis, an inward looking approach to identifying the root causes of our problems and an inclusive, outward looking approach to solving our problems hold the key to unlocking Pakistan’s real promise.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 18th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
" Look across the Muslim world and you’ll find that Pakistan is increasingly one of the more stable democracies. Take the events in Egypt or even Turkey recently where people’s power on the street threatens, or in some cases, even topples elected governments (in the case of Egypt, with the help of the military)......"
Nothing but unadulterated hogwash! The recent events that occured in Egypt are actuallly a turn for the better. The Muslim brotherhood would in fact feel at home in Pakistan, because the majority of Pakistanis are cut from the same cloth. The anti-Morsi group are actually fighting for limiting religion in the public sphere, protecting women's and minority rights! Unlike Pakistan. The young Turks are also fighting for limiting religion in the public sphere. In Pakistan extremism is the main stream. In Pakistan fundamentalism is the normal.
Does the author mean what he wrote? A phoenix bursts into flames in its dying moments and is reborn as a young chick. This cycle repeats itself during the life (and death) of the phoenix.
Some historian will document the role of Zardari not using his govts power to frustrate and target opposition as the reason for democracy's success . If they don't, history will miss out a chance and an example
@sterry: My dear friend, state the facts, you have absolutely no respect for human life, and no concern for human suffering. How can a dog eat dog society be civic minded; you hardly know what the word civic means.
There is no phoenix effect, all effects emanate from your absurd and vulgar culture of hypocrisy, dishonesty, egotism, emotionalism and chauvinism.
Yes...I agree. South Asia is democratic because of the influence and ready-reference of India, which happens to be a successful example of democracy( however flawed). Had Pakistan been in the Middle-East or Africa, it would have continued being an oligarchy or military-dictatorship. Accept it or not, India's presence makes a difference
No. Np, Noooooooooo!
There is nothing wrong with Jinnah and Iqbal's Pakistan or Pakistanis. It is all a Hindu and Jew conspiracy. Zaid Hamid told me himself. Really, .....
Democracy in Pakistan and many Third World countries is a charade. Elections are a means to replace one group of crooks with another group of crooks.
Nothing has changed since Nawaz Sharif and his party came to power a couple of months ago. Terrorist attacks have not subsided, Balochistan continues to be mutinous, and power outages persists all over Pakistan.
This is Mr. Sharif's third term in office. Since the first time Mr. Sharif became the head of the government in 1990, Pakistan has been going down the drain due to bad governance. Bad governance is a phenomenon common to South Asian countries.
Mr. Bilal Lakhani knows too well nothing will change; there will be no ‘naya’ Pakistan.
The root cause of problems in Pakistan is the intolerant and backward mindset of the people; only education can change that.
Pakistan is democratic solely because neighbor India is democratic. In fact Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives and now Burma are democratic because India is democratic. In fact if KSA was democratic the whole of middle East would have been democratic. Democracy is seducing, contagious and irreversible. Egypt has turned democratic in the sense it won't have a dictator anymore. King Abdullah may jolly well turn out to be the last king of KSA.
Eerily similar to Zaid Hamid's rantings, only more delusional.
typical pak mentality
If Pakistan is the example of stable democracy in muslim world, then I really pity the Muslim world.
**> Look across the Muslim world and
Brings to my mind - "...in the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed is the King...."
Pakistan ruling elite class,(Noblers) has decided not to fight with each other, but to protect status quo for their next generations to rule over majority illiterate Pakistani (Commoners)with frace democracy,protecting the interest of elite segement of soceity and also to have some jouranlists on pay role to counter those ,who are not interested in comfortable life and bebfits. Pakistani donot have patience for democracy and their politicians are also not democrates.
There are countries and people living outside the muslim world, please look at them and then talk about your country's position
"unlike most Muslim nations such as the Arab states, Pakistanis are more civic minded"
If that was the case civic rights would trump ethnic/religious ones and the Ahmadis, Christians, and other religious minorities would be able to practice their religion and have the same right to life, liberty, and property that other Pakistani citizens in their society do. So Pakistanis may mouth about being "civic minded" but their acts don't meet that definition.
Good one... Makes sense... Specially what u said in ur last paragraph.
The ill-defined Islamic democracy is the real Phoenix and they await the signal from the ugly American. Rest is history you missed at school.