Levying tax on real estate will not be easy. DESIGN: FAIZAN DAWOOD
When the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution and the Seventh National Finance Commission Award were negotiated, there was an understanding that while the federal government would supply the provinces with significant revenues, they would each seek to increase their own revenues as well. The conversation around provincial taxes often frequently gets bogged down into talk about agricultural income taxes. However, the real tax that is likely to yield far more revenue is one on residential and commercial real estate.
Pakistan’s financial system is highly underdeveloped and so the country’s rich people do not really park their money in stocks and bonds or even bank accounts. They buy real estate, which accounts for a disproportionately high percentage of their net worth. The government has had considerable difficulty in going after rich people’s incomes because they are frequently undocumented. But taxing their properties should be considerably easier and the provincial governments should do so immediately. To this end, the process of creating computerised land registries in every province should be accelerated. Punjab and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa have already started. Sindh and Balochistan would do well to follow suit. We would also recommend that the tax be levied not on the amount of land, but its actual value, so as to ensure that wealthier people pay a higher tax rate.
Levying this tax will not be easy and there will be some very strong opposition to it, but that is the point: nobody likes paying taxes. They have to be forced into it, kicking and screaming if necessary.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 12th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1730959638-0/trump-(19)1730959638-0-165x106.webp "article")
Taxing empty plots or purchases is all right...but there still exist big houses that are the only piece of property/asset of an aged couple with only retirement income. They may have inherited property or built it after years of mehnat. Its not fair to heavily tax such people. Not every person who has a house has a tremendous inflow of income. Houses were cheaper a decade or two decades earlier!
I concur with the assesment that people buy land to park their access cash. Majority of the time the land remains unutilized as the buyer has no intention of cultivating it or building on it. Hence the land remains unproductive for a long period of time. With our ever growing population we cant have people holding on to land which they do not plan on utilizing. Lets tax these empty plots heavily so that the buyer either should sell it or build something on it to generate employment.