Wimbledon is the world’s premier tennis tournament but for 77 years, the crowds there have seen only Germans, Swedes, Americans, Australians Spaniards, etc. lifting the trophy. Seeing the pandemonium for the 2005 Ashes win or the gold medals at last year’s London Olympics only highlights the fact that the Englishman is starved of two things — the sun and sporting prowess. Until now.
Even though Murray has courted controversy in the past for his less-than-patriotic demeanour towards England, it came to a head when he was asked before the 2006 football World Cup of who he wanted to win. His response, “Anyone but England” showcases the historic baggage that exists between England and Scotland.
So, how did he win Wimbledon? The ingredients were always there for Murray. He had the bullet-like shots, the long reach and the serve and volley game so suited for grass, but always seemed to be on fringes of the winner’s circle. Murray did things incrementally; appointing Ivan Lendl as coach was a master stroke as the eight-time champion knew what he wanted out of his temperamental ward. Lendl brought his calm to the play and ever since then, Murray’s angry young man persona has made fewer appearances. He is a lot fitter and does an annual ‘boot camp’ in Miami in the off-season. His superb fitness was evident in the five-set comeback victory against Fernando Verdasco in the quarter finals and the way Murray shrugged off any lingering fatigue from that gruelling match. His emotional “I am getting there” statement in last year’s Wimbledon final got hearts fluttering and his patriotic credentials were cast in iron when he won the Olympic Gold for Britain at the 2012 London Olympics and thrashed Roger Federer in the final, the man who had brought him and England to tears a few months back.
The joy of the nation is a sight to be seen and they now have a genuine, died in the wool champion. Honours will flow in, a knighthood (he already has an OBE), endorsements, perhaps, even a road or two named after him. Toasts will be raised to him and we may see a scowling Andy statue at Murray Hill. Elton John will write a ballad and for a few days, the English will forget about the Beckhams and the ovarian lottery winner due in a few months. But nothing will capture the moment of his win in the world’s premier tournament, the thundering applause and the non-stop shouts of “Come on Andy!”. They say the English summer is three events — the Lord’s Test, Royal Ascot and Wimbledon. This year the summer is complete.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 10th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (33)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Haha. This is a well-written piece but some of the gushing comments seem to indicate that the writer' has asked his friends to comment on the piece!
@Zehra: If you don't trust this gentleman try British newspapers. Be careful, Wikipedia can embarrass you.
Sibtain is so hot.
Murray wins it, good. As a fan of Tennis and sportsman I like it and congratulate him as well for this achievement but whats the point of celebrating that a Britian has won it after 77 years. This shows our countrymen are still slaves of their old master which has gone long ago but we are not ready to change their status as our masters.
I know many English people who are not happy a least bit because according to them a Scottish wins the Wimbledon not English. So this win after 77 years is nothing for them. But Pakistanis are celebrating it like their own country men wins the Wimbledon.
Gr8 ARTICLE! You hit the nail on the head with the subtle hints and the altruistic references, a well composed, almost trance like take on a handsome sport!
How can this summer be complete when the Ashes have just begun?
Oh yeah and the best Ashes win for England was the 2010/11 victory on Aussie soil, not the 2005 one.
I don't think Britain are underachievers in sports, I mean they've got Formula one champs like Lewis Hamilton and Jensen Button, world champion boxers like Amir Khan and David Hayes, they've got one of the best competitive cyclists(Bradley Wiggins), they've got many great golfers, I'm not sure if Rory McIlroy counts as British though?but they've great athletes overall, lets not forget that the EPL is the best football league and Man Utd is the second best football club in the world.
England even won the 2010 T20 world cup, and they're the ones that invented cricket,football,ruby,field hockey and many other modern sports.
So I find it funny people say Britain hasn't achieved much.
"Elton John will write a ballad and for a few days, the English will forget about the Beckhams and the ovarian lottery winner due in a few months." I was Laughing out Loud after reading this. Great sense of humor!
A lovely article from a lovely person.
This is the best article about Wimbledon I have ever read. A beautiful composition of history, humor and satire.
@sohail5221
Dear sir, while i apreciate your statement in your comment:
" If I am correct the winner of the mens Wimbledon gets a silver trophy and the runnersup gets a shield"
i believe the womens final of wimbldon they are presented with a shield.
Whatever the case may be the silver is certainly the color of the trophy the winner recieves at the mens single final at Wimbledon
Anyhow someone needs to clarify what the runnersup recieves.....
The Men's Singles Champion is presented with the Gentlemen's Singles Trophy a silver gilt cup with a cover. This is the exact same trophy presented to the first ever winner of this particular tennis tournament back in 1887.
The Women's Singles Champion is presented with a silver salver referred to as the "Rosewater Dish" or "Venus Rosewater Dish". This trophy was made back in 1864 by Messrs Elkington And Company Limited based in Birmingham and cost 50 Guineas (£52.50) to be made.
@sohail5221: the winner gets a golden trophy...!!
The writer is so cute. I absolutely loved whatever he said.
This article is a splendid piece of art. I am a great fan of Mr Sibtain's writing skills and has been following his blogs from the start. Great to see his article in this section. He truely deserves this.
@A.A Sibtain is right! Silver is the color of the Wimbledon trophy. It doesn't necessarily mean second place. If I am correct the winner of the mens Wimbledon gets a silver trophy and the runnersup gets a shield.
a silver trophy??????
An excellent short cover drive with historic glimpse.
A great joy in reading this article. Everything is perfect with the correct prose. The author has a genuine and natural flair for writing. Gripped me in from the first line. Almost poetic. A commendable job Sibtain!
Reading this article was like a treat for me. Thank you Mr Sibtain. Eager to read more from you.
Major props to the author of this superbly written editorial piece, i implore all readers to check out Sibtain's original article on Murray which written just 4 days ago at the Tribune Blogs which has "bonus features". Great writing as always, Keep it up!
A very well written and well researched article Mr Naqvi!
I'm literally awestruck by the beautiful use of words in this well constructed article. Hats off to Mr. Sibtain! Its hilarious how people dont realise the magnanimity of men's tennis. I being a female dont know nor do i care about Virginia Wade, Wimbledon's lasting impact is with Men's singles finals and the primary records and trophies are connected with Mens Singles. People should'nt confuse them. For me Murray is truly the first brit to ever win Wimbledon in 77 years!! Nitpickers will heckle everywhere, dont worry Sibtain, your article is on a league of its own
An immaculate piece on this Sundays historical match! Another great piece by Naqvi. Its a pity commentators donot realise that Andy Murrays win was a win for the Mens Singles Tournament, why do they have to continually drag Virginia Wade's name here, we all respect Wade but one must understand that Wade was a win for women singles tournament
@Zehra Please try to refrain from posting comments just to nitpick. You must research your comments first. Sibtain Naqvi is talking about Murrayto become the first British winner of the men's singles title since Fred Perry in 1936, the first Scot of either sex to win a Wimbledon singles title since Harold Mahoney in 1896, We are not talking about Virginia Wade here. In Wimbledon the men's and women's singles are treated as 2 separate entities. This isn't gender discrimination
@Zehra
You obviously have no idea the context upon which this article is written upon. Hereby the entire world is rejoicing upon the fact that a male Brit has won Wimbledon, there no gender bias, everyone knows Virginia Wade won in 1977. She having made history, Andy Murray can kick-start a new legacy.
@Zehra
Virginia Wade was a female, this article is celebrating the nale brit after 77 years. Please do your research before commenting.
What a joy to read this, still fresh of his Sunday evening's win Murray is the Brit Scott posterboy for bringing the crown back to the Queen! Awesomely written, beautiful use of words Mr Naqvi!
I had the pleasure of reading Sibtain's piece a few days ago when it was a blog on ET. I can proudly say i read the "directors cut", beautifully written!
"Wimbledon is the world’s premier tennis tournament but for 77 years, the crowds there have seen only Germans, Swedes, Americans, Australians Spaniards, etc. lifting the trophy."
Virginia Wade, UK. Wimbledon Singles Champion 1977
Please do you research before writing.
Very nicely written. Shows the writers absolute grip on the subject.