Differences among the coalition partners in Balochistan have marred the formation of the cabinet in the province, The Express Tribune has learnt.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, a senior official revealed that the allied parties – Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, National Party (NP) and Pashtunkhwa Milli Awami Party (PkMAP) – are still carrying out consultation over the allocation of provincial departments to the incoming ministers despite a considerable lapse of time.
“Disagreement over the allocation of departments and the share [of each party] in the 15-member cabinet are the actual causes of the delay,” the official maintained.
While a three-member cabinet has been formed since last week, it is practically non-functioning since none of the members have been allocated any portfolios yet.
According to NP central secretary general Tahir Bizenjo, constitutional provisions which demand that the annual provincial budget be approved by the cabinet before it is made public forced the coalition government to announce a three-member cabinet. He conceded that the three parties have not made any breakthrough as far as the allocation of portfolios is concerned, but expected the cabinet to be finalised by next month.
PkMAP central secretary general Akram Shah, however, denied there were any differences between the three coalition partners. He too admitted, though, that it would take them another month to finalise the provincial cabinet.
“Our desire to resolve all issues pertaining to the cabinet and to create better understanding [between the coalition partners] is the reason behind the delay,” Shah said, adding, “PkMAP does not believe in hatching conspiracies against its ruling partners.”
According to Shah, his party has demanded five out of the 15 portfolios. PML-N Balochistan chapter president Sanaullah Zehri, however, is not willing to allot the party more than three ministries.
A close aide of Zehri argued that despite being the largest parliamentary party, PML-N had already conceded the chief minister’s slot to one junior coalition partner (NP) and the governor’s slot to the other junior party (PkMAP).
“Both parties should not demand equal representation in the cabinet now… Why do they keep on insisting when they have been given the province’s top offices,” he asserted.
According to sources, PML-N wants to reserve nine cabinet portfolios for itself and is willing to spare three each for NP and PkMAP.
The two junior partners, however, counter by saying they have conceded the Balochistan Assembly speaker and deputy speaker slots for PML-N. They argued that as such PML-N should not ask for more than five cabinet slots.
The three coalition partners are also struggling to clinch important portfolios, such as planning and development, finance, communication and works, education, irrigation, public health and engineering, revenue, excise and taxation, home, mines and minerals, fisheries and food, and the Balochistan Development Authority. Comparatively less important portfolios, such as zakat and ushr, women’s development, social welfare and jails, are not the first choice of any of the parties.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 29th, 2013.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
That is, if this Government last for THREE years?
It's true that PkMAP had emerged as the biggest party in the elections. Some lotas joined the PML N later after they came to know for sure that they can benefit. The independents should be banned from joining any party after the polls as it is political corruption.
The reporter uses the term 'junior partner' for PkMAP almost 5 times in his story which is quite unfair. Post May 2013 election, PkMAP emerged as a largest party in Balochistan assembly with 11 MPAs followed by PML-N (8), National party (6) and JUI-F with 5 MPAs. PML-N surpassed PkMAP by merging the MPAs of PML-Q and independents after the election. Even then, the alliance of PkMAP and National party had more seats in the assembly than PML-N. Nawaz Sharif wisely conceded CMship of the province to PkMAP-NP alliance for three reasons: the track record of PML-N MPAs in Balochistan was not clean at all. Most of these MPAs joined the party few months ago and almost all of them held important ministries in the Raisani brigade that broke the record of incompetence and corruption in Balochistan. Secondly, there was enormous pressure on PML-N by the civil society to support Dr Malik's candidature for CMPship and not to nominate Zehri - a ruthless tribal warlord with extremely criminal and corrupt background. Thirdly, not conceding to the demands of PkMAP-NP alliance would have meant partnering with JUI-F - a gang of corrupt and shameless Mullahs who have been part of every government in the last 2 decades. Nawaz Sharif would have lost the moral ground to claim good governance had he supported the experienced thugs in the province instead of genuine democratic parties with clean background. Hope you take all this into consideration before awarding the title 'junior partners' to respectable and genuine democratic parties of Balochistan.
PkMAP is over rated