Pakistan rejects Afghan allegations of terror sanctuaries

Pakistan's ambassador to UN Masood Khan says terrorists operate on both sides of the border.


APP June 20, 2013
Khan said that Pakistan operates as one state where all institutions of the state have consensus that terrorism is a threat to both Pakistan and Afghanistan .

UNITED NATIONS: Pakistan on Thursday categorically rejected Afghan accusations over existence of terrorist sanctuaries on Pakistani soil in the United Nations Security Council, reiterating peace and stability in Afghanistan is a key constituent of Islamabad's foreign policy.

"I reject most emphatically (Afghan) Ambassador (Zahir) Tanin's argument - root, trunk and branch - that terrorist sanctuaries exist in Pakistan and some elements continue to use terrorism as an instrument of foreign policy," Pakistan's permanent Ambassador to the UN Masood Khan said during the 15-member Council's debate on the report of United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA).

"No, sir, this is not true; and you know this is not true," he said looking towards his Afghan counterpart. "And this is not good diplomacy. By using such arguments, you cast aspersions on our sincerity.”

Khan said that Pakistan operates as one state where all institutions of the state have consensus that terrorism is a threat to both Pakistan and Afghanistan and therefore both countries should work together to eliminate this scourge.

"Peace and stability in Afghanistan is a key constituent of Pakistan's foreign policy, which is supported by all state institutions."

The ambassador insisted that success of the policy requires reciprocity, trust and goodwill. He made it clear that his rejoinder was not a tit-for-tat response.

"I have said this to highlight that terrorists operate on both sides of the porous border. Many attacks against Pakistan are planned on Afghan soil. That is why we need more aggressive policing and surveillance of the border. This will also help stop the shelling. We must not allow terrorists manipulate and divide the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan.”

Insisting that political trust needs to be built, Khan said that the joint commission, chaired by Pakistan's Prime Minister and the President of Afghanistan, is the best forum for pursuing this objective.

Earlier, the Afghan ambassador spoke of about continued acts of terrorism in his country, saying the people of Afghanistan "are still the main victims of this heinous (that) continue to exist in Pakistan's soil and some elements continue to use terrorism as an instrument of foreign policy."

COMMENTS (19)

khan of Kabul | 11 years ago | Reply

@Sultan Ahmed *For example, terrorism,was born in Afghan land that is the pure result of foreign invasion but as have seen extended to Pakistan*

Oh thank you we didnt know about it.. and who are TTP and where was OBL and Haqani Network excuse me!

You either act very smart or you dont know what is happening around you which makes me feel sorry for you and the like of you..

Sultan Ahmed. | 11 years ago | Reply

“Peace and stability in Afghanistan is a key constituent of Pakistan’s foreign policy, which is supported by all state institutions.”

No doubt,, government and people of Pakistan unanimously understand that Afghanistan is our close muslim brother state,we have common interest with eachothers and time of test,Afghan satbility is our stability,Afghan solideity is Pakistan's soliderity.

In case, any problem creats in Afghaistan Pakistan may automatically victim of the problem>

For example, terrorism,was born in Afghan land that is the pure result of foreign invasion but as have seen extended to Pakistan,

In fact, whole Pakistan is facing and has been facing insurgency and despite of all is ready to sacrifice for peace in Afghanistan, Afghanistan must follow the same tradition if the present leadership of Afghan government want soliderity,stability integrity in the regin.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ