In last month’s election, much was made about Pakistan’s young voters turning out to vote in large numbers. The belief of young Pakistani voters in our democracy is a welcome development, one that will only strengthen us in years to come. But what Snowden did is something that reflects more than just a sense of pride in his country’s democracy: it is a sense of responsibility to protect it against presidential overreach.
What makes Snowden’s actions more admirable was the fact that he was formerly a CIA officer, and until his leaking, was employed by Booz Allen Hamilton, a firm that pays its employees to serve as consultants largely to one client: the US government. Snowden went against not just the desires of his former employers, he went against his own personal economic interests.
It is this sense of obligation, of loyalty to a higher ideal,that Pakistan sorely needs. Will we ever get a young officer in our government leaking information that may be damaging to his or her personal careers, but helps fortify our democracy? We certainly hope so, because there are many government institutions in Pakistan that have a habit of overreaching their authority and not having their decisions questioned.
We are not in favour of leaking national secrets indiscriminately, but not everything the government wants to hide qualifies to be called a national secret. Sometimes, it is helpful to discuss matters of security policy openly. It shows a nation secure in its own sense of self and identity.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 16th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Speaking of citizens responsibility - hows Shakil Afridi doing? Exposing the whereabouts of the most wanted terrorist on the planet has to as good as exposing the NSA.
agreed. very well said, i think wiki leaks is also doing a very good..
In a sentimental and religiously infested soceity like Pakistan you will put such youngsters in lot of trouble.
Excellent article, I see a lot of similarity between the motivations of both Snowden as well as Dr Afridi. The actions of the Governments of Pakistan and the USA are also very similar. However where I see a difference is in the judicial procedure of the two countries. The US does not have a kangaroo court which it can create or use to convict and imprison Snowden, at best it can keep harassing him if he returns to America.
But in our case - someone stole our votes with the help of judiciary - the same PCO judiciary who was set too free by a movement powered by the youth of this county. Youth is in a state of hopelessness thinking that even ballot cannot bring change in this country - that institutes who were supposed to provide justice to the citizens have become a party. There is no law exists for whistleblower protection, and even if it existed with the present judiciary and executives, no Snowden will ever rise in Pakistan.